Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
The 'Darr' touch which is always appreciated.
I just want to comment on the HB 180mm lens which I find to be outstanding. I also have the CFi version which I purchased as new numerous years ago and am glad I have never sold.
Best to you......
Victor B
Hi, Ray,Reppin, Schwerin Germany
903SWC, CFV50c
Ray
I say keep the sun. It is an unexpected element not normally seen in this type of image. While unexpected, it is not out of place or an after thought/mistake. It adds value.Lake Erie with one of its beautiful shale shorelines. I'm questioning that leaving the sun enhances the image.
I too think it adds, not detracts, especially with the lighting pattern extending radially from it across the open water. But that said, if you happen to have cropped out any of the top morning sky, I would add some back in as the current crop seems a little "tight" to me.Lake Erie with one of its beautiful shale shorelines. I'm questioning that leaving the sun enhances the image.
+1I would add some back in as the current crop seems a little "tight" to me.
Thanks Jack I agree. In fact, I considered removing the sun because it is too close to the top not because I didn't want it in the image. A framing error, not a crop. I was paying too much attention to the rocks at the bottom of the frame. I may add some sky by cloning. Shouldn't be difficult as there is zero detail, just some subtle color change.I too think it adds, not detracts, especially with the lighting pattern extending radially from it across the open water. But that said, if you happen to have cropped out any of the top morning sky, I would add some back in as the current crop seems a little "tight" to me.
My .02,
So, I am going to tell why I don't agree with Jack, not that Jack's idea is not valid, but I have a bit of a different take. I think if you enlarge the sky, it will diminish the appearance of the sun, making it seem smaller. This is connected to the effect of the "Moon Illusion." By having the sky tight, the sun will be more dominant--at least cognitively.Thanks Jack I agree. In fact, I considered removing the sun because it is too close to the top not because I didn't want it in the image. A framing error, not a crop. I was paying too much attention to the rocks at the bottom of the frame. I may add some sky by cloning. Shouldn't be difficult as there is zero detail, just some subtle color change.