Who here is still very much happy with their X1D and don't find the enhancements in X1D II essential to make the upgrade?
I got the X1D recently and have been pretty satisfied with it.. I am looking for reasons to NOT get the upgrade already.. I intended to shoot only with the 45p and use this X1D as a walk around camera but after seeing some samples of the 90mm XCD lens, I just couldn't resist buying it. It's got way better background separation than some of the 2.8 lenses I have used in MF systems. It's truly gorgeous! But this is it though, I probably wouldn't get any other XCD lenses.. that's another reason why I don't really want an upgrade to X1D II.
I used to have a GFX 50r but sold it in December and now without a GFX body and several lenses as I eagerly wait for my pre-ordered 100s too be shipped like many many others I guess..
Naturally, the 80mm f1.7 is also pre-ordered! I've got 23, 32-64, 50, 110, 250+1.4x TC already.. and a 120 macro with GFX adapter from my older Pentax 645 system..
I got the X1D recently and have been pretty satisfied with it.. I am looking for reasons to NOT get the upgrade already.. I intended to shoot only with the 45p and use this X1D as a walk around camera but after seeing some samples of the 90mm XCD lens, I just couldn't resist buying it. It's got way better background separation than some of the 2.8 lenses I have used in MF systems. It's truly gorgeous! But this is it though, I probably wouldn't get any other XCD lenses.. that's another reason why I don't really want an upgrade to X1D II.
I used to have a GFX 50r but sold it in December and now without a GFX body and several lenses as I eagerly wait for my pre-ordered 100s too be shipped like many many others I guess..
Naturally, the 80mm f1.7 is also pre-ordered! I've got 23, 32-64, 50, 110, 250+1.4x TC already.. and a 120 macro with GFX adapter from my older Pentax 645 system..