usm
Well-known member
This would be my first tech cam. I worked with a Leica M and a 28mm Shift lens; +- 11mm shift.
I have a Hasselblad CFVii50c - 33x44 Sensor. I was close to buy a Factum from a forum member, but sadly the deal didn't work. So I also missed a HR 35mm lens deal.
Now I have time to rethink about the opportunities:
First: Weight and size is an issue for me, I take this setup with me for high mountain walks and city walks. So no car parking shots.
Second: How much rise?
Which is more useful: 35mm with 15mm rise or 40mm with 23mm rise?
I know about the Focal Length Visualizer: Vertically the 35mm +-15mm is kind of equal to 40mm +- 20mm which matches my old 28mm 24x36 setup.
I am not sure about the 15mm shift of the Factum - is it enough for architecture?
The Cambo WRC 400 has a 20mm movement and is as light as the factum (I still find the factum is nicer looking but I can "rethink" this).
The Alpa STC is just to much money.
How much rise is really needed? Is, as much as possible, always good?
The PhaseOne XT is limited to 12mm - I am sure they know why 12mm is enough...
Also I am not sure about the lens: since no of the Schneider lenses would work with my sensor I have to stick with the Rodenstocks.
I don't need a lens wider den 30mm.
The HR 32 is to heavy and to expensive.
The HR 35mm is my favourite - light but limited movements (there are tests that 15mm are possible). This lens would give me the same as my Leica M 28mm shift setup.
The HR 40mm gives me more shift but the Factum is limited - so I have to change to a Cambo WRC 400.
This will be +- the same wight - the Cambo is 100g lighter, the lens is 100g more.
But the HR 40mm lens is very close to my XCD45p without movement of corse.
For later on, if I decide to buy another lens (something between 60mm to 80mm) it would be better to have more movements.
For example the HR 70mm with a 100mm IC would give me 39/35 mm shift.
May be I can upgrade to a Rm3di from the Factum by buying just a "half" Rm3di?
There is no "upgrade" for Cambo.
Another thought was the Hasselblad Flexbody with a Distagon 40mm lens:
This setup is very heavy, the 40mm IF lens alone is around 1000g + Flexbody + H Adapter.
It has also limited movements.
And I can use the aperture mode of the 907x?!
What about a HTS 1.5 + 0,8 Converter + 24/28mm lens?
I guess it's heavy and expensive.
But does it record the lens, shift settings to focus?
And I can use the aperture mode of the 907x?!
About the Schneider lenses: Are they all not good for the 33x44 (Hasselblad, Fuji, Sony) Sensor?
Last thing:
Important for me is the "out of focus" rendering of the lens.
How sharp a lens is, is easy to find out but to find the "out of focus" rendering of a lens wide open is hard.
So I am looking for the "other side":
HR 35mm 4.0 wide open with closest focus possible pointed to a house, street, what ever.
HR 40mm 4.0 wide open with closest focus possible pointed to a house, street, what ever. (I have one)
THanks for reading.
I have a Hasselblad CFVii50c - 33x44 Sensor. I was close to buy a Factum from a forum member, but sadly the deal didn't work. So I also missed a HR 35mm lens deal.
Now I have time to rethink about the opportunities:
First: Weight and size is an issue for me, I take this setup with me for high mountain walks and city walks. So no car parking shots.
Second: How much rise?
Which is more useful: 35mm with 15mm rise or 40mm with 23mm rise?
I know about the Focal Length Visualizer: Vertically the 35mm +-15mm is kind of equal to 40mm +- 20mm which matches my old 28mm 24x36 setup.
I am not sure about the 15mm shift of the Factum - is it enough for architecture?
The Cambo WRC 400 has a 20mm movement and is as light as the factum (I still find the factum is nicer looking but I can "rethink" this).
The Alpa STC is just to much money.
How much rise is really needed? Is, as much as possible, always good?
The PhaseOne XT is limited to 12mm - I am sure they know why 12mm is enough...
Also I am not sure about the lens: since no of the Schneider lenses would work with my sensor I have to stick with the Rodenstocks.
I don't need a lens wider den 30mm.
The HR 32 is to heavy and to expensive.
The HR 35mm is my favourite - light but limited movements (there are tests that 15mm are possible). This lens would give me the same as my Leica M 28mm shift setup.
The HR 40mm gives me more shift but the Factum is limited - so I have to change to a Cambo WRC 400.
This will be +- the same wight - the Cambo is 100g lighter, the lens is 100g more.
But the HR 40mm lens is very close to my XCD45p without movement of corse.
For later on, if I decide to buy another lens (something between 60mm to 80mm) it would be better to have more movements.
For example the HR 70mm with a 100mm IC would give me 39/35 mm shift.
May be I can upgrade to a Rm3di from the Factum by buying just a "half" Rm3di?
There is no "upgrade" for Cambo.
Another thought was the Hasselblad Flexbody with a Distagon 40mm lens:
This setup is very heavy, the 40mm IF lens alone is around 1000g + Flexbody + H Adapter.
It has also limited movements.
And I can use the aperture mode of the 907x?!
What about a HTS 1.5 + 0,8 Converter + 24/28mm lens?
I guess it's heavy and expensive.
But does it record the lens, shift settings to focus?
And I can use the aperture mode of the 907x?!
About the Schneider lenses: Are they all not good for the 33x44 (Hasselblad, Fuji, Sony) Sensor?
Last thing:
Important for me is the "out of focus" rendering of the lens.
How sharp a lens is, is easy to find out but to find the "out of focus" rendering of a lens wide open is hard.
So I am looking for the "other side":
HR 35mm 4.0 wide open with closest focus possible pointed to a house, street, what ever.
HR 40mm 4.0 wide open with closest focus possible pointed to a house, street, what ever. (I have one)
THanks for reading.