Like many of you, I've been going back into my archives and reprocessing some of my historical images. My main point to this thread is two-fold. First that *I perceive* raw processors --in my case C1-- have improved enough to warrant redos -- some of my best legacy images were processed with 5 or 6 revisions back. Second is I make that statement mainly because I feel I'm able to extract just enough more compared to what I gleaned from the original file. So while it could be that I'm more facile, I think the real reason is the software got just enough better to make a noticeable difference. Thoughts?