The GetDPI Photography Forum

Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!

The Fujinon GF Tilt Shift Lenses Are Finally Here!

The Fujinon GF Tilt Shift Lenses Are Finally Here!
By Dave Gallagher
Posted September 12, 2023
In Fujifilm, Fujifilm GFX, Fujifilm Tip, News




I can’t remember the last time I anticipated a lens release that would impact my market as much as the new Fujinon Tilt Shift lenses. Fujifilm has shocked the photography market over and over again by creating the highest quality extra low dispersion aspherical lenses at an amazing low cost to the consumer. But one glaring hole in their line up has always been the lack of any lenses with movements. This has forced the architectural / table top photographer to either use a different digital camera, attach a digital back to a Cambo view camera, or, at worst, “correct in post.” But alas, this no longer has to be the case. We can now begin taking orders on these two lenses immediately.
Let’s get all the technical data out of the way first. Take a look at the following specs to compare these two long awaited lenses against each other.

Search:
FUJINON GF 30MM F/5.6 T/SFUJINON GF 110MM F/5.6 T/S MACRO
35mm Equivalent24mm87mm
Elements1611
Degrees of Tilt8.5°10°
MM of Shift15mm15mm
Angle of View84.7°27.9°
Focus Distance12"17.2"
Max Magnification.21x.5x
Filter Size105mm72mm
Height5.5"5.85"
Weight2.95 lbs2.76 lbs
Lens HoodYesNo
Adapter ring and Tripod CollarYesNo
Ships onOctober 26thNovember 30th
Price$3,999.95$3,499.95
Showing 1 to 14 of 14 entries
THE FEATURES THAT STAND OUT
  • 15mm of Shift in each direction – This is 3mm more than the current “competitive” T/S lenses
  • Shift and Rotation angle data stored in the metadata of the image
  • Large 85mm images circle that more than covers the 33×44 sensor
  • The highest quality optics – 3 GM, 3 ED, and 1 Super ED elements
WHY DOES THIS MATTER?
This is just plain simple. The current crop of T/S lenses fail when combined with today’s high resolution sensors. And yes, we have no issue stating this over and over. If you know anything about Capture Integration, then you know we back up our statements with knowledge and real world testing. We have been amazed at just how all of the top brand’s T/S lenses fail when we compare them to a fixed lens shifted on a body with movement. And they don’t just fail, they fail in plummeting ball of flames.
THE TEST
We performed a very simple panoramic 3 image stitch with a Canon R5 and a Fujifilm GFX 100s. The bodies are in the same exact location using the same tripod mount. Below are the specs for each body

  • Fujifilm GFX 100s 100mp Digital Camera body
  • Fujinon GF 30mm T/S Lens
  • 15mm shift Left, 15mm Shift right, and straight shot
  • Stitched in PS 2022
  • ISO100, f/5.6, 1/30th second
  • No sharpening or retouching – 1 stop of midtone adjustment

  • Canon R5 45mp Digital Camera body
  • Canon EF to R Lens adapter
  • Canon 24mm T/S II Lens
  • 12mm Left, 12mm right, and straight shot
  • Stitched in PS 2022
  • ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/30th of a second
  • No sharpening or retouching – 1 stop of midtone adjustment
Fuji GFX 100s with GF 30mm T/S
Canon R5 with 24mm T/S II

Fujifilm on the left and Canon on the right
At the center, these two images show a megapixel resolution difference. That is all. You can’t expect a 45mp Canon Sensor to resolve what a 100mp Fujifilm sensor can resolve. Both images were as sharp as to be expected of these two systems. The Canon file resolved as we thought it would and is suitable for many lower resolution needs.

Fujifilm on the left and Canon on the right
The focus chart on the right was not positioned all the way to the end of the frame for either body. At this point we can see both a resolution limitation and a lens failure. The Canon file shows the beginning of a radial blur issue that we see with every single Canon T/S lens. This issue can produce a decent image and many don’t even recognize that their lens has an issue. But remember, the Canon 24mm T/S II is on the front of a 45mp body. Add this lens to a 100mp body and the results become unacceptable.

Fujifilm on the left and Canon on the right
When the focus charts on the left are imaged with the maximum shift on each camera body/lens combination, the true depth of the problem is illustrated. The Canon system has both radial blur and severe distortion. And it shows that this body lens combination is not linear. One side is severely worse than the other. We at CI see these issues daily when customers finally decide to move up from 35mm DSLR/Mirroless systems to the higher quality medium format capture systems. The knee jerk reaction is that “we must have a bad lens” and I assure you that all of our tests with multiple Canon lenses show this same issue. Yes, some lenses are more extreme than others. And this is what led us to liquidate our full dslr inventory a few years back.

IT CAN’T BE THIS MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE…
I love the quality of my iPhone. It takes a darn good image. But when I compare it to an actual interchangeable-lens digital camera, it pales in comparison. By itself is is great! Side by side, I can see the real difference.
And I can unequivocally state that this is the same situation here. 35mm systems fail when compared side by side to medium format sensors on view cameras, tech cameras, or now, a native T/S lens. In my experience, T/S dslr glass has failed for years. Many photographers use them because it’s all that has been available or that it is just “good enough” for their clients needs. If you want to know what I think about that “good enough” mentality, then do a search of our website for “good enough”. It’s an enjoyable read.
THANK YOU FUJIFILM
We are thrilled to have these high quality lenses available to our Fujifilm customers today. This medium format combination should be the gateway for many 35mm sensor customers to move up to the quality of medium format capture. If I am a Fuji GFX shooter then I would want the option to be able to pull out one, if not both of these lenses, out of my camera bag when I needed them. We anticipate a very large back order. Please place your order as soon as possible to secure your spot in the queue.


FUJINON GF30MM T/S
ORDER NOW

FUJINON GF110MM T/S MACRO
ORDER NOW
 

Alan

Active member
Duplicating a post I just made on DP Review responding to @marc aurel about C1 and the new 30mm TS: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/67255342

TL;DR version: profile recognized but corrections not enabled. Lens has a bit of distortion and light falloff, but I'm very impressed!

Warning: nerdy architecture photo stuff ahead...

I just updated C1 and checked out the DP Review sample files. Image DSCF0668 is particularly good for checking corrections since it's well leveled and has detail in the shifted corner.
https://www.dpreview.com/sample-gal...0-ii-pre-production-sample-gallery/2913371124

My standard workflow for finding shift amount in leveled architectural images is:
  1. Set grid to mm on the sensor (or .5mm if possible) for the GFX, this is 66x88 for a .5mm grid.
  2. Read the distance from center of the image (red cross in preview window) to the location of zero convergence of horizontal lines (camera level). If two dimensions of shift have been used, do this for both X and y directions.*
  3. Enter that offset in the Lens Correction - Movement field. (This offset affects distortion, light falloff, CA correction and sharpness falloff.)
As I went to enter the measured shift amount (about +15mm Y), I saw that it had already been populated by default! One change is that normally there are Shift X and Shift Y fields - that's changed to Shift and Direction. (There are also Tilt and Direction fields now too!) Anyway, cool - the lens profile and shift metadata are recognized by default.

Distortion correction and Light Falloff are set to zero by default. Attached is a series of screenshots that shows the progression of enabling those corrections (setting each to 100%). Blue marks show default settings, red for settings I've changed.
  1. No correction - as opened in C1
  2. Distortion correction only, set to 100%
  3. Distortion and light falloff correction set to 100%. I dropped exposure 1/3 stop to compensate for the now brighter image.
  4. Distortion and light falloff corrected, and canvas expanded to show the stretched corners.
DSCF0668_GF30_Profile_1s.jpg

DSCF0668_GF30_Profile_2s.jpg

DSCF0668_GF30_Profile_3s.jpg

DSCF0668_GF30_Profile_4s.jpg
*Note: in my own work, I always shoot a zeroed frame to calculate shift from. This way I don't have to take notes :)
 
Last edited:

vjbelle

Well-known member
It certainly is an impressive file. I opened it in ACR and the latest version does not have a lens profile nor any data fields for shift or tilt. The camera and lens were both recognized by ACR so at least Adobe is partially on top of the updates to the new camera and lens.

Victor B.
 

diggles

Well-known member
I opened it in ACR and the latest version does not have a lens profile nor any data fields for shift or tilt.
Since ACR doesn't have fields for lens movements like C1, I'm wondering if it will just be BTS information that is used when calculating the 30 TS lens profile lens distortion and vignette correction.
 

vjbelle

Well-known member
More than likely ACR will not incorprate the data fields for this lens since this is somewhat esoteric. It really doesn't matter much to me as the distortion level is somewhat minimal and again impressive. I would have to see the files that I take to make a determination as to the 'real' distortion levels. Light falloff is easy to correct.

Good times for us in our small univerise.

Victor B.
 
Last edited:
Since ACR doesn't have fields for lens movements like C1, I'm wondering if it will just be BTS information that is used when calculating the 30 TS lens profile lens distortion and vignette correction.
Lightroom in the current version does not make use of the embedded shift metadata of the lens. If you compare the screenshots from C1 Alan showed above – the image in Lightroom looks like Alans uncorrected image. I could not even find the shift metadata in the exif data panel.
 
More than likely ACR will not incororate the data fields for this lens since this is somewhat esoteric. It really doesn't matter much to me as the distortion level is somewhat minimal and again impressive. I would have to see the files that I take to make a determination as to the 'real' distortion levels. Light falloff is easy to correct.

Good times for us in our small univerise.

Victor B.
I agree that distortion and vignetting are very small with this lens. Impressive indeed. But not zero.
For shooting architecture the perfect correction of originally straight lines is not what I would call "esoteric".

By the way – I liked you word creation "univerise", a universe with rise (and shift) ;-)
 

vjbelle

Well-known member
Since ACR doesn't have fields for lens movements like C1, I'm wondering if it will just be BTS information that is used when calculating the 30 TS lens profile lens distortion and vignette correction.
Who knows.... Even under the 'Lens Correction Filter' in PS Fuji is not listed as an option for manufacturer. Adobe may never make any corrections for this lens. For me, it wouldn't matter as I much prefer to make my own adjustments.

Victor B.
 
Last edited:
Who knows.... Even under the 'Lens Correction Filter' in PS Fuji is not listed as an option for manufacturer. Adobe may never make any corrections for this lens. For me, it wouldn't matter as I much prefer to make my own adjustments.

Victor B.
Hi Victor,
I can of course understand. Everybody has his own approach.
But please don't say that too loud 🙏. Those who want this feature need support in their request :whistle:
Best, Marc
 

diggles

Well-known member
I'm somewhat ok without seeing the shift data, my assumption was that it would be viewable somewhere in the metadata, but now I'm not sure… No lens correction would be very disappointing though.
 

vjbelle

Well-known member
Adobe, to my knowledge, has never supported movement correction for any lens. Very small market and I suppose they don't feel justified to make the code changes. Would, of course, be very nice to see them put their toes into this area but I'm not keeping my fingers crossed. I have made a mental decision to move away from C1 as I really don't like their business practices. Just a decision for me and not encouraging anyone else to come along.....

Victor B.
 

corvus

New member
I was just talking with an architect while scouting today about how far away to shoot overall building exteriors. I showed him how 35mm (on 135 format) is my default "neutral" feeling focal length that doesn't make the building feel too flat or too sharp. (This would be around 45mm on a GFX, 50-55mm on IQ4.) He expressed annoyance with photographers who always push super wide exaggerated shots with the corner of the building projecting up in an acute angle.

Of course, that's not always possible to use due to other buildings across the street, too tall of a subject building, etc. And last week, a different architect was totally OK with the super-wide look. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Alan, I agree with that wholeheartedly. I'm an architect myself, and I value it just as much. For the most balanced focal length, I use the rule of thumb that it should roughly correspond to the diagonal of the image. In full format, that would be 40-45mm, for example. Then the proportions and the depth of space appear approximately as in the real spatial perception. A bit wider is still okay, but I would not favor getting as much as possible on the image with extremely large image angles if the image proportions suffer as a result. This can be very distorting, for example in interior shots, when original squares become elongated trapezoids.
When I was in the Berlin Olympic Stadium for the first time, I was shocked by what a steep funnel this space formed. I knew it before only from TV, where it seemed wide and flat and somehow boring. Architects do not like such images at all ;)

Greetings Torsten
 
Top