Menu
What's new
The GetDPI Photography Forum

Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!

thoughts on architectural photography with Fujifilm GFX, image circle and lenses

H

haihan

New member
updates (2021.07.14) : distortion settings on C1 w CTSE24 & P645 35, Canon 17mm & 50mm TS E nodal

haihan said:
Thoughts on architectural with GFX, image circle and lens

updates (2021.07.14) : distortion settings on C1 w CTSE24 & P645 35, Canon 17mm & 50mm TS E nodal

This is not a review, I am simply sharing the raw files which you could cook up your dishes and taste them and draw a conclusion yourself on the lenses which you would like to acquire for similar usage.

Here’s the final (compilations) image circle test:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/852qykifh56nfpv/AADJluCMM1Ex1Mvq3mTw8aFXa?dl=0

Aperture is usually f11 or f13, f16 for Pentax 645 A 120mm

GFX 50S / 50R
Canon 17mm TS E
Canon 24mm TS E
Schneider 28mm PC
Contax Zeiss 35mm PC Distagon
Canon 50mm TS E macro
Pentax 645 45-85mm
Pentax 645 80-160mm
Pentax 645 75mm
Pentax 645 120mm macro
Pentax 67 135mm macro
Pentax 67 55-100

GFX 100
Canon 17mm TS E
Canon 24mm TS E II
Canon 50mm TS E
Canon 90mm TS E
Pentax 645 35mm HD D FA
Pentax 645 A 55mm
Pentax 645 A 75mm
Pentax 645 A 120mm

Appreciations:
I would like to sincerely show my appreciation to Darren, Kim Yee, Chris, Bryan, Stefan, Inessa, Michael, Xiao Ming, Markus, Jim and John whom have supported, shared and contributed their findings in the early days on lens image circles testing on GFX 50S, and you.

The same tread on facebook GFX page:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?...2&set=gm.975221809588375&type=3&theater&ifg=1

Lenses which I use regularly:
Canon 17mm TS E, nodal 4.0
Canon 24mm TS E II, nodal 3.3
Canon 24mm TS E II, nodal 3.3, Capture One distortion correction: "Phase One Digital AF 28mm f4.5", distortion at "70"
Pentax 645 HD D FA 35mm, nodal 3.1, Capture One distortion correction: "Phase One Digital AF 35mm f3.5", distortion at "70"
Canon 50mm TS E macro, nodal 4.6
Pentax 645 A 55mm, nodal 5.8
Pentax 645 A 75mm, nodal 8
Canon 90mm TS E, nodal 7.5
Pentax 645 A 120mm macro, nodal 7
Pentax 67 55-100mm
Pentax 645 80-160mm, nodal 2.0 @ both 80 & 160mm
Fujifilm GF 32-64mm, nodal @32 n5.5 / @44 n5.3 / @50 n5.2 / @64 n5.9

Adapters:
Mirex P645 to EF ts adapter
Kipon EF to GFX adapter
Photodiox P67 to 645 adapter
Click to expand...
 
H

haihan

New member
You can only do it with a shift lens shifting the camera while the lens is stationary, ie simulating having a bigger sensor. A multi row or single row pan can't do that.

Cheers!

hh

wallpaperviking said:
Just wondering what the best technique is to use the 32-64mm in situations where correct perspective is required and you do not want excessive foreground? In effect, simulating what a TS-E lens does.

Is it best to tilt up and digitally correct perspective that way? Or is it better to do a wider shot, have verticals straight, then crop into the image?

Both these techniques result in a smaller file but am wondering which is an easier technique and results in less file loss? If cropping into the image, you are losing some on the wide end whereas I feel not so as much as tilting up and then correcting verticals in post.

Would also be nice to be able to see the result on location. I have tried this with the Fuji App and then Photoshop on my phone but to say that is a clunky process is an understatement!

Thanks, look forward to hearing any thoughts :)
Click to expand...
 
H

haihan

New member
updates!! (2021.08.29) : added Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f4's nodal points @ all focal lengths.

haihan said:
Thoughts on architectural with GFX, image circle and lens

updates (2021.08.29) : added Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f4's nodal points @ all focal lengths.

This is not a review, I am simply sharing the raw files which you could cook up your dishes and taste them and draw a conclusion yourself on the lenses which you would like to acquire for similar usage.

Here’s the final (compilations) image circle test:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/852qykifh56nfpv/AADJluCMM1Ex1Mvq3mTw8aFXa?dl=0

Aperture is usually f11 or f13, f16 for Pentax 645 A 120mm

GFX 50S / 50R
Canon 17mm TS E
Canon 24mm TS E
Schneider 28mm PC
Contax Zeiss 35mm PC Distagon
Canon 50mm TS E macro
Pentax 645 45-85mm
Pentax 645 80-160mm
Pentax 645 75mm
Pentax 645 120mm macro
Pentax 67 135mm macro
Pentax 67 55-100

GFX 100
Canon 17mm TS E
Canon 24mm TS E II
Canon 50mm TS E
Canon 90mm TS E
Pentax 645 35mm HD D FA
Pentax 645 A 55mm
Pentax 645 A 75mm
Pentax 645 A 120mm

Appreciations:
I would like to sincerely show my appreciation to Darren, Kim Yee, Chris, Bryan, Stefan, Inessa, Michael, Xiao Ming, Markus, Jim and John whom have supported, shared and contributed their findings in the early days on lens image circles testing on GFX 50S, and you.

The same tread on facebook GFX page:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?...2&set=gm.975221809588375&type=3&theater&ifg=1

Lenses which I use regularly:
Canon 17mm TS E, nodal 4.0
Canon 24mm TS E II, nodal 3.3
Canon 24mm TS E II, nodal 3.3, Capture One distortion correction: "Phase One Digital AF 28mm f4.5", distortion at "70"
Pentax 645 HD D FA 35mm, nodal 3.1, Capture One distortion correction: "Phase One Digital AF 35mm f3.5", distortion at "70"
Canon 50mm TS E macro, nodal 4.6
Pentax 645 A 55mm, nodal 5.8
Pentax 645 A 75mm, nodal 8
Canon 90mm TS E, nodal 7.5
Pentax 645 A 120mm macro, nodal 7
Pentax 67 55-100mm
Pentax 645 80-160mm, nodal 2.0 @ both 80 & 160mm
Fujifilm GF 120mm, nodal 4.5
Fujifilm GF 32-64mm, nodal @32 n5.5 / @44 n5.3 / @50 n5.2 / @64 n5.9
Fujifilm GF 45-100mm, nodal @45 n4.0 / @60 n4.3 / @80 n4.8 / @100 n5.5


Adapters:
Mirex P645 to EF ts adapter
Kipon EF to GFX adapter
Photodiox P67 to 645 adapter

Panorama:
Really Right Stuff multi row kit ( Thanks to Ruey Loon & Bernard Languillier!)
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
rdeloe

rdeloe

Well-known member
The Laowa is significantly better than the Canon, even at just 5mm of shift. Impressive.

Thanks for posting this work!
 
diggles

diggles

Well-known member
The Laowa looked interesting to me so I decided to give it a try. I like the focal length for architectural photography and my test results were similar to what @haihan found when comparing it to the 24mm TS-E II. The copy I got is off center though so I'll be sending it back. I may try another one, not sure yet.

You can see how much sharper the right side is compared to the left at f8.

Laowa-20mm-Left.jpgLaowa-20mm.jpgLaowa-20mm-Right.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top