The GetDPI Photography Forum

Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!

What Changed Your Photography More: A Book, A Person, or A Mistake?

darr

Well-known member
For me, it was a book — though not a photography book.

I was in third grade. It was winter. I was deeply unhappy.

My parents had recently separated, and I’d been uprooted from sunny Southern California and dropped into icy New Jersey. My teacher, perceptive and kind, decided I could spend my afternoons in the school library while the rest of the class worked on arithmetic. I’d come from a classroom where we were already well into fractions, and I think she sensed that books would steady me better than numbers that year.

There was one more wrinkle: I arrived left-handed, and she gently decided I might practice writing with my right hand. The whole left-to-right brain retraining experiment was… not my favorite season of life. But in the end, I can write with both hands, so I suppose that experiment worked. 😂

In that library sat a beautiful set of encyclopedias filled with photographs. My love of books really began as a love of images. One afternoon, flipping through another volume, I turned a page and there she was, looking straight back at me: Dorothea Lange’s Migrant Mother.

At eight years old, I didn’t yet understand why that image stopped me cold. That would come later. But in that moment, something shifted. I remember feeling an electric clarity — as if I had just met my future self. I knew what I wanted to be.

The things little girls of my generation were expected to dream about — marriage, weddings, the tidy arc of domestic life — weren’t front of mind for me then. What mattered was becoming a photographer who could make a difference for someone.

Life, of course, unfolded fully. I did marry. I raised a family. And I went on to build a long career as a portrait and special-event photographer — telling stories, honoring people, preserving moments. I’m retired from that chapter now, but the thread that began in that library has never really left me.

That single photograph in an encyclopedia changed everything.

I’d love to hear what shifted things for you — was it a book, a person, or perhaps a mistake you’re now grateful for?
 
Sorry, but only a short notice.
I have difficulties to recover my "Fun", as when I was shoting the Ricoh GR, here there, everywhere....so the comment is somehow reverse.
But this article is immense interesting, the photos eye-opening.
It seems, it took him 7 years to be able to step out of the conventions and make photos in Monet's garden, that satiesfied him....
Again, are we restricted and limited by the conventions, inner- and outer-?
We name the threads "Fun with..."
But are we given ourselves true "fun"/ or name it : restrictless creation?
Thorkil
 
Last edited:
Good question!

My folks were not proud of their humble origins, and sought to elevate their offspring by exposing them to what they saw as upper-class culture. And so, I grew up surrounded by a whole lot of book collections from the Time-Life people (art, cooking, nature, science, but alas, not the photography series). Encouraging personal creativity was not particularly their goal, rather, they hoped we'd become comfortably bourgeois but at ease among society's upper crust.

My initial attraction to photography had nothing to do with self-expression: Rather, there was the lure of cool hardware, and it seemed like a swell way to collect mementos of special occasions. And gear connoisseurship does serve as a kind of secret handshake in certain circles! But I wasn't satisfied with the state of my earlier photographs: They were mostly well-exposed, properly focused, and, following a couple of photography classes, some of the compositions weren't too bad. But they only seemed to convey a fraction of what I pictured in my mind's eye.

Two books which had a big influence on me were Walden by Henry David Thoreau, and Freeman Patterson's Photography and the Art of Seeing: I was hooked on the notion that the world was full of wonders if I were willing to pay attention. Such things came naturally to me as a small child: When did I become too engrossed in my own thoughts to actually see things? Turns out that there's much richness in many of life's in-between, nothing-special moments.
 
My academic advisor (RIP Barrie) used to have a quote from Albert Szent-Györgyi posted on his door. AS-G was, a Nobel biochemist.

"Research is to see what everybody else has seen and to think what nobody else has thought." That pretty much sums up the process of basic reearch and, for me, photography. I try to communicate my own personal impressions of what everyone sees. If I see well and apply technical skills well, my interpretation is distinctive and intersting in some way.
 
I'm the same as Knorp, still learning and (hopefully) developing by constantly looking around me to what others produce, both amateurs and professionals.

But what got me started to take photography more seriously were the books and photo's by Ansel Adams. Before that photography for me was a method to document my other hobbies (trains, buses, watersport, vacations, .....), after that it became a hobby (and passion) in itself.
 
Top