I am a Panasonic S1r owner/user and am aware of the stated superiority of the S1 vs S1r when it comes to low light/high ISO situations. And there are several Internet posts that attempt to demonstrate the difference via their low quality photos (low quality due to Internet requirements), but I cannot find any information regarding how many stops of actual improvement the S1 offers when compared to the S1r?
I have not been disappointed with the S1r's low light capability, but if the S1 offers a quantifiably, significant low light advantage I might consider adding it to my stable of camera bodies.
Thank you in advance,
Ron
I have not been disappointed with the S1r's low light capability, but if the S1 offers a quantifiably, significant low light advantage I might consider adding it to my stable of camera bodies.
Thank you in advance,
Ron