Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
re: square format ...It is nice on the m9 because it was easier to handhold than I thought. Also, the instant feedback on the screen helps allot. I would really like a square format specially for a pinhole though. ...
Sometimes square just works better. The last photo I posted in the GXR picture thread is an example ... I framed it for square from the outset. It is made with the Ultron 28mm f/2 ...I never tried to shoot square with the m9. It is more that I usually like to shoot as wide as possible with the lens that I have but I'll try it, thank you.
I tend to shoot in a variety of aesthetic ideas until a series gels into a solid concept. Then I focus what I'm doing to suit the needs of the project for exhibition and presentation.A few years ago I decided to standardize on square and B&W, at least for my urban and natural landscape shooting. For people I shoot 2:3. Although I very much like portraits in the square format.
Double Negative, I hear you on the pinhole effects. But I'm a Pictorialist at heart. All this emphasis on sharpness and detail gets to me. Born in the wrong era, I guess.
I would think that the gizmo is a lens (any), there's not less than nothing.Those Lens Baby gizmos are kinda lost on me too.