Site Sponsors
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 151 to 195 of 195

Thread: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

  1. #151
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by D&A View Post
    Question: I realize there are of course developmental costs, but since the M lens user base is substantially larger than the S2 user base, along with S lenses being more sophisticated with AF, internal chip, large glass etc., I wondered why the new 50mm AA is generally speaking, so much more expensive than some of the S2 lenses. One maybe can argue that getting to this level of performance in a small rangefinder lens, is more expensive? Hard to know.

    Dave (D&A)
    Have you seen the Peter Karbe vimeo film?
    16 years in development - specially designed glass - I think it's easy to understand.

    all the best

    Just this guy you know

  2. #152
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,275
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    7

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Wow. Sometimes I forget how lucky we are on GetDPI to have more-often-than-not civilized conversations with differences-in-tastes taken into consideration and appreciation for when someone puts information out into the community.

    Reading through the immature, unappreciative, dismissive banter on Range Finder Forum nearly made me sick to my stomach.

    GetDPI may have ties to "Dante's Inferno". But RFF is truly a descent into hell.
    Doug Peterson , Digital Transitions | Email
    Dealer for: Phase One, Mamiya Leaf, Arca-Swiss, Cambo, Eizo, Profoto
    Office: 877.367.8537. Cell: 740.707.2183
    Likes 6 Member(s) liked this post

  3. #153
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    422
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    what doug said - the air is so much clearer here than at RFF or FM.

  4. #154
    Senior Member Hosermage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA
    Posts
    1,034
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Thanks Jono for the heads up, I didn't know the video existed and just watched it.

    Just some personal thoughts.. which is very likely completely wrong, so I'll disclaim it first Peter Karbe strikes me as someone who's only interests is in the tech/optics side of the business and wouldn't care much as to how the lens is marketed or priced. To him, he simply want to build a better lens than what's already out there.

    After a few days of digestion, I think I now have a different view of the MM and the APO Summicron. If we think of the levels of equipments as a ladder, then naturally each person should climb and pick the equipment best fit for their own level. IMO, Leica is simply extending the ladder here. If you use M9P, shoot BW only, and find it to be limiting sometimes, here is hopefully a better tool to extend the limitations, at a similar price. If you feel the "need" for an APO 50mm that can act like an Summilux given the increase in ISO sensitivity, here you go.

    People who don't feel limited by their equipments simply has no need for these gears so no point in complaining about the price or functions. Increments of technology at the high level will likely be small and expensive, so people who wants it will probably find a way to justify it. It's just not realistic to think that Leica should build it and price it so everyone should and could buy one. Since I'm already over-reaching my ladder by getting a M9, I simply applaud them for expanding the range of what's possible, should I need it in the future.
    David Young
    My journey into Leica: LeicaLux.com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  5. #155
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Vivek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    13,604
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Hosermage View Post
    If we think of the levels of equipments as a ladder, then naturally each person should climb and pick the equipment best fit for their own level. IMO, Leica is simply extending the ladder here. If you use M9P, shoot BW only, and find it to be limiting sometimes, here is hopefully a better tool to extend the limitations, at a similar price.
    David (or anyone else), Since your post revolves around tech/opt (technology/optical) issues, let me pose this question-

    What does APO stand for and why would it be relevant for monochromatic captures?

  6. #156
    Senior Member Hosermage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA
    Posts
    1,034
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Well, I don't think the lens was built for this particular camera/sensor only. I've read so much that I don't remember where all the information comes from anymore... but someone did said that this lens is paired with this camera because of the new resolution the sensor is capable and it'll really show off in the image. If it's inception was really from 16 years ago, I would guess that APO was an added bonus of the design, and perhaps useful when M10 is released in later months.

    edit: doh, it was from the video... "This lens will of course only reach peak performance in conjunction with the M9 Monochrome because it has the resolution, and the entire imaging chain is so lossless, that it's only then that the performance of the lens comes across."
    David Young
    My journey into Leica: LeicaLux.com

  7. #157
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by D&A View Post
    Question: I realize there are of course developmental costs, but since the M lens user base is substantially larger than the S2 user base, along with S lenses being more sophisticated with AF, internal chip, large glass etc., I wondered why the new 50mm AA is generally speaking, so much more expensive than some of the S2 lenses. One maybe can argue that getting to this level of performance in a small rangefinder lens, is more expensive? Hard to know.

    Dave (D&A)
    Just a guess- but somewhere I read comment from Leica that one factor which makes the designs of M-glass more demanding is the size limitations - which do not exist for the s-glass.

    For my part - I have doubts that there can be enough IQ advantage in the new 50 asph Summicron over existing 50mm lenses to convince ME to spend this amount of money, even I have no doubt that it will be the best 50mm lens. I have the feeling that for "absolute" IQ I would rather use MF (in my case S2), and that for using the M9 I am pretty happy with the IQ I can get from a 50 Summilux or Summarit. And for that amount of money I rather like to have the "special effects" of the Noctilux.

    But ....maybe I will change my mind after having seen the first images with this lens. And I have to say I do like that Leica is brave enough to present a lens like this.

  8. #158
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,674
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Hosermage View Post
    Thanks Jono for the heads up, I didn't know the video existed and just watched it.

    Just some personal thoughts.. which is very likely completely wrong, so I'll disclaim it first Peter Karbe strikes me as someone who's only interests is in the tech/optics side of the business and wouldn't care much as to how the lens is marketed or priced. To him, he simply want to build a better lens than what's already out there.
    Yes, I echo David's appreciation to Jono for mentioning the video and some of David's thoughts regarding Peter Karbe. His tech/optics approach seems to extend to optical perfection. Maybe one of the reasons I believe he thinks so highly of the 75mm Cron and not the 75mm Lux and I believe he may have even addressed this very point in the past. It's just an assumption on my part but he doesn't particulary favor Madler designs. I think both have their place and both are important!

    In that sense it's a very good thing but in another, I think he's missing part of a Leica user segment that likes and looks for character in their lenses. Whether this "character" or "look" is caused by intentional lens design or by happenstance, due to aberrations, isn't the point of my comments. The technical perfect optics are ideal for most S2 users, as the majority of them aren't using it for street photography, although for portrait work, I can see some character injected into a particuclar S2 lens, could be a desirable feature.

    With regards to the M system, character (or the way a lens "draws") is a big plus for some. A higher resolution M10 may indeed require lenses like the new 50mm APO to take advantage of its new sensor, yet many cannot get away from the fact that the M body is simply used as a vehicle to choose their canvas brush (the lens) to paint their picture. Many have felt recent Leica lens releases have been "near" technically perfect but that perfection has come with a price...namely loss of character. I've heard it from many. Even the amazing 35mm Lux asph FLE has its distractors, due to the sometimes less than pleasing bokeh thats can be provoked in some situations when shooting with that lens.

    I think Leica is missing a wonderful opportunity by not designing a line of M lenses that focus on the way a lens draws, or maybe a line of lenses with specific designed character in mind, and advertises these as such. Doesn't mean they can't have their technically perfect lenses, but if that's the only direction they will take, I feel sooner then later, the resulting images their cameras produce are all going to look similar. It's not unlike what Nikon has done with many of their recent f1.4 glass or Zeiss 35mm SLR lenses. The look of each respective line of lenses look very similar except for focal length...but thats OK, since they often are used for styles of photography different than M systems users. As soome have hinted about....with lenses like the new 50mm AA and a higher resolution M10...we'll have essentually a mini S2 (or S3) and except for file sizes, images from both will all look the same? I think some M users would like that but an equal number wouldn't.

    What does this all have to do with the M9M camera we're discussing in this thread? It has to do with the lens choices used with the M9M. I believe those into 35mm B&W photography (film or digital) are more than most, concerned with the "look" of many of their images they capture, as much as ultimate edge to edge sharpness and resolving power. Although many legacy lenses are available, I think a line of new lenses designed to perform well on a digital rangefinder in terms of low CA etc., but concentrating on their design to have an identifiable signature, so that the way it "draws" and the ultimate character of the image it takes...may be very desirable lenses to extend the already noted advantages of shooting B&W with the M9M.
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  9. #159
    Senior Member Hosermage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA
    Posts
    1,034
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    So I guess I had it backward... it's not the lens that show off the sensor, it's more like the sensor is showing off the lens' resolution. Yay... no need to buy this with an M9! Kind of scary... does this mean when the M10 arrives with undoubtedly higher resolution, we can expect a rework of all the lenses at $5000 above their current price?
    David Young
    My journey into Leica: LeicaLux.com

  10. #160
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by D&A View Post
    Yes, I echo David's appreciation to Jono for mentioning the video and some of David's thoughts regarding Peter Karbe. His tech/optics approach seems to extend to optical perfection. Maybe one of the reasons I believe he thinks so highly of the 75mm Cron and not the 75mm Lux and I believe he may have even addressed this very point in the past. It's just an assumption on my part but he doesn't particulary favor Madler designs. I think both have their place and both are important!

    In that sense it's a very good thing but in another, I think he's missing part of a Leica user segment that likes and looks for character in their lenses. Whether this "character" or "look" is caused by intentional lens design or by happenstance, due to aberrations, isn't the point of my comments. The technical perfect optics are ideal for most S2 users, as the majority of them aren't using it for street photography, although for portrait work, I can see some character injected into a particuclar S2 lens, could be a desirable feature.

    With regards to the M system, character (or the way a lens "draws") is a big plus for some. A higher resolution M10 may indeed require lenses like the new 50mm APO to take advantage of its new sensor, yet many cannot get away from the fact that the M body is simply used as a vehicle to choose their canvas brush (the lens) to paint their picture. Many have felt recent Leica lens releases have been "near" technically perfect but that perfection has come with a price...namely loss of character. I've heard it from many. Even the amazing 35mm Lux asph FLE has its distractors, due to the sometimes less than pleasing bokeh thats can be provoked in some situations when shooting with that lens.

    I think Leica is missing a wonderful opportunity by not designing a line of M lenses that focus on the way a lens draws, or maybe a line of lenses with specific designed character in mind, and advertises these as such. Doesn't mean they can't have their technically perfect lenses, but if that's the only direction they will take, I feel sooner then later, the resulting images their cameras produce are all going to look similar. It's not unlike what Nikon has done with many of their recent f1.4 glass or Zeiss 35mm SLR lenses. The look of each respective line of lenses look very similar except for focal length...but thats OK, since they often are used for styles of photography different than M systems users.

    What does this all have to do with the M9M camera we're discussing in this thread? It has to do with the lens choice used with the M9M and I believe those into 35mm B&W photography (film or digital) are more than most concerned with the "look" of many of their images as much as ultimate edge to edge sharpness and resolving power. Although many legacy lenses are available, I think of lenses designed to perform well on a digital rangefinder in terms of low CA etc., but focusing on the way it "draws" and the ultimate character of the image it takes...may be very desirable lenses to extend the advantages specifically of the M9M.
    If I compare Leica lenses, and I include the new designs, to other brand lenses I believe like puts a lot of effort in how their lenses draw.
    Look at 50 mm: The Summarit with a more classical drawing, the Summilux with a very warm, smooth, "alive" drawing, the Noctilux with a special drawing wide open. And now the new Summicron with (my guess) a ore neutral high resoltion drawing. What else can one wish?

    Plus you have the option to usee alll kinds of old glass, Zeiss glass, CV glass etc etc.

    I also can not see how the S-lenses would not have any character, just because they offer high resolution.

  11. #161
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,674
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Paratom View Post
    I have the feeling that for "absolute" IQ I would rather use MF (in my case S2), and that for using the M9 I am pretty happy with the IQ I can get from a 50 Summilux or Summarit. And for that amount of money I rather like to have the "special effects" of the Noctilux.

    But ....maybe I will change my mind after having seen the first images with this lens. And I have to say I do like that Leica is brave enough to present a lens like this.
    LOL! I just read what you wrote after writing my lengthy post above. You stated exactly what I feel many M users feel about shooting their M camera vs. other systems they have , whether Nikon, the S2 or Medium format. Namely when it comes down to absolute sharpness and resolution above everything else, thats fine for those other systems (and rightfull so for most)...but when it comes down to why they shoot a Leica M, for some, it's more than absolute resolution & sharpness...but charater too in the way their lenses "draw" an image. Your expressing spending for a Noct before wanting the new 50mm AA is just an example...or if you wanted a techinically perfect images, you would use your S2. Interesting!

    I agree, the Leica lenses you mentioned still have character, even though they are of modern design....but I also see a trend with many recent Leica M lens releases....and that is technical perfection above all else. The 75mm cron, the new 50mm Cron APO (although we still have to see what images from it are like), the new 21mm f3.4 and most notably the new 35mm Lux asph FLE are just a few examples. The current 50mm Lux asph although having maybe less character than the pre asph, does have a signature than many identfy with. It's just a recent trend in my opinion and I've heard it said by others. Again its all very subjective...no right or wrong and it depends on one's intended use.

    Dave (D&A)

  12. #162
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by D&A View Post
    LOL! I just read what you wrote after writing my lengthy post above. You stated exactly what I feel many M users feel about shooting their M camera vs. other systems they have , whether Nikon, the S2 or Medium format. Namely when it comes down to absolute sharpness and resolution above everything else, thats fine for those other systems (and rightfull so for most)...but when it comes down to why they shoot a Leica M, for some, it's more than absolute resolution & sharpness...but charater too in the way their lenses "draw" an image. Your expressing spending for a Noct before wanting the new 50mm AA is just an example...or if you wanted a techinically perfect images, you would use your S2. Interesting!

    I agree, the Leica lenses you mentioned still have character, even though they are of modern design....but I also see a trend with many recent Leica M lens releases....and that is technical perfection above all else. The 75mm cron, the new 50mm Cron APO (although we still have to see what images from it are like), the new 21mm f3.4 and most notably the new 35mm Lux asph FLE are just a few examples. The current 50mm Lux asph although having maybe less character than the pre asph, does have a signature than many identfy with. It's just a recent trend in my opinion and I've heard it said by others. Again its all very subjective...no right or wrong and it depends on one's intended use.

    Dave (D&A)
    Dave,
    I think we agree in maby points but differ in one - I believe high resolution doesnt necessarly mean less character.

  13. #163
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,674
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Paratom View Post
    Dave,
    I think we agree in maby points but differ in one - I believe high resolution doesnt necessarly mean less character.
    You are correct! High resolution does not mean less character. Maybe I should have said, it often appears technically perfect lenses often lack some or many of the characteristics that are often desirable in shooting certain subjects. Often some older or less technically perfectly designed lenses with a certain degree of optical flaws, aberations etc., seem to have a optical signature or fingerprint, which adds character to an image and enhances it's look or presentation in the eyes of many.

    I think it's actually possible to achieve a number of these goals in a single design...one that is of high resolution, superb sharpness across the frame, yet is specifically designed to have a readily identfiable character, one that many will find attractive for certain types of imagery...whether it be B&W, street or reportage photgraphy or some others. If it wasn't for the last generation 35mm Lux asph (pre FLE) exhibiting focus shift along with maybe a bit too much field curvature (yielding to slightly soft edges)...some might say a lens like this had many of those desirable traits...or maybe the current 50mm Lux asph, which may lean on the side of technical perfection but neverless some feel still draws a lovely image. I'd put the currrent 28mm Crom in much the same catagory as the current 50mm Lux asph.

    It may not be a surprise that some have traded in their 35mm Lux asph FLE for the current VC 35mm f1.2...simply to get back some of the character and nice bokeh along with its indentifiable fingerprint, that some felt was lost with the technically superior and near perfect 35mm Lux asph FLE.

    Dave (D&A)
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  14. #164
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1253

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Reminds me of the Stieglitz school of photography departing from the portrait school back in, what, 1902?

  15. #165
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by D&A View Post

    With regards to the M system, character (or the way a lens "draws") is a big plus for some. A higher resolution M10 may indeed require lenses like the new 50mm APO to take advantage of its new sensor, yet many cannot get away from the fact that the M body is simply used as a vehicle to choose their canvas brush (the lens) to paint their picture. Many have felt recent Leica lens releases have been "near" technically perfect but that perfection has come with a price...namely loss of character. I've heard it from many. Even the amazing 35mm Lux asph FLE has its distractors, due to the sometimes less than pleasing bokeh thats can be provoked in some situations when shooting with that lens.
    hi there
    I can't tell you how much I disagree. The Mandler lenses are lovely, but there are a lot of truths around which need to be examined. I give you two examples

    1. The 35 cron IV is the bokeh king
    Just like the new FLE it sometimes gets it badly wrong
    2. The 75 'cron APO is too clinical
    Spend an hour with one and you'll appreciate it's organic and delicate character.

    I've spent a lot of time and a lot of money trying differente eras of lenses, and I've come to the conclusion that the modern lenses have a consistency and character that cannot be matched. Of course this is my opinion, and I fully appreciate that some may prefer the older lenses. But there's no need to qualify this preference by accusing the modern lenses of lacking character.

    I've spent an hour with the new summicron, and I've seen a bunch of images (by better photographers than me ) printed to 6ft. it's gorgeous. Not because it's sharp, but because it's gorgeous! I've been kidnapping grannies all over Norfolk to sell so that I can buy one!

    The new lenses are probably more technically perfect. But this doesn't necessarily imply a loss of character.

    (or you could assume that, having spent so much on modern lenses "he would say that wouldn't he"

    Just this guy you know
    Likes 5 Member(s) liked this post

  16. #166
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by dougpeterson View Post
    Wow. Sometimes I forget how lucky we are on GetDPI to have more-often-than-not civilized conversations with differences-in-tastes taken into consideration and appreciation for when someone puts information out into the community.

    Reading through the immature, unappreciative, dismissive banter on Range Finder Forum nearly made me sick to my stomach.

    GetDPI may have ties to "Dante's Inferno". But RFF is truly a descent into hell.
    Hi there Doug
    You're so right. It's lovely here, and I so much appreciate the responses I've had. It definitely feels like home. (thank you again everbody)
    Of course, if you put yourself out there you have to be prepared for a slappin'. I've been there before, and I understand the deal. Doesn't make it more comfortable though. Of course, I realise my own limitations, but it's nicer to keep it to oneself.
    I console myself with private critiques of the detracter's images which I share with the boss one example was:
    "cliched,shallow and sexist images of women which don't even have the courage to be raunchy"

    So another big thank you to everyone here for being fantastic and civilised!

    Just this guy you know
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  17. #167
    Senior Member Hosermage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA
    Posts
    1,034
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Say Jono... so when you take a vacation this summer... can I tag along?
    David Young
    My journey into Leica: LeicaLux.com
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  18. #168
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    hi there
    I can't tell you how much I disagree. The Mandler lenses are lovely, but there are a lot of truths around which need to be examined. I give you two examples

    1. The 35 cron IV is the bokeh king
    Just like the new FLE it sometimes gets it badly wrong
    2. The 75 'cron APO is too clinical
    Spend an hour with one and you'll appreciate it's organic and delicate character.

    I've spent a lot of time and a lot of money trying differente eras of lenses, and I've come to the conclusion that the modern lenses have a consistency and character that cannot be matched. Of course this is my opinion, and I fully appreciate that some may prefer the older lenses. But there's no need to qualify this preference by accusing the modern lenses of lacking character.

    I've spent an hour with the new summicron, and I've seen a bunch of images (by better photographers than me ) printed to 6ft. it's gorgeous. Not because it's sharp, but because it's gorgeous! I've been kidnapping grannies all over Norfolk to sell so that I can buy one!

    The new lenses are probably more technically perfect. But this doesn't necessarily imply a loss of character.

    (or you could assume that, having spent so much on modern lenses "he would say that wouldn't he"
    I'd tend to agree. The 50 LUX ASPH is a perfect example of a modern lens with lots of character, but not at the expense of other attributes. All my M lenses are modern fast ASPHs save one ... the 90/2.8, which I love for portrait type work and the way it renders.

    I also think the type and quality of light plays a huge role in what is often subscribed as "lens character" ... not to mention the hugh variance in opinions regarding what constitutes good "bokeh."

    At least there is something out there for most everyone's tastes.

    -Marc
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  19. #169
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by fotografz View Post
    I'd tend to agree. The 50 LUX ASPH is a perfect example of a modern lens with lots of character, but not at the expense of other attributes. All my M lenses are modern fast ASPHs save one ... the 90/2.8, which I love for portrait type work and the way it renders.

    I also think the type and quality of light plays a huge role in what is often subscribed as "lens character" ... not to mention the hugh variance in opinions regarding what constitutes good "bokeh."

    At least there is something out there for most everyone's tastes.

    -Marc
    Hi Marc
    The 90 f2.8 is the only non ASPH lense I have. I love it. The fan painter shots on the website were all taken with it.
    As for Bokeh. Stir lighting, personal preference, subject matter and focal length into the mix, and it's hard to get to any real truth.
    All the best

    Just this guy you know

  20. #170
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Vivek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    13,604
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Hosermage View Post
    Well, I don't think the lens was built for this particular camera/sensor only. I've read so much that I don't remember where all the information comes from anymore... but someone did said that this lens is paired with this camera because of the new resolution the sensor is capable and it'll really show off in the image. If it's inception was really from 16 years ago, I would guess that APO was an added bonus of the design, and perhaps useful when M10 is released in later months.

    edit: doh, it was from the video... "This lens will of course only reach peak performance in conjunction with the M9 Monochrome because it has the resolution, and the entire imaging chain is so lossless, that it's only then that the performance of the lens comes across."

    Even if everything is contradictory, it makes perfect sense doesn't it?
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  21. #171
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    3,187
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    hi there
    I can't tell you how much I disagree. The Mandler lenses are lovely, but there are a lot of truths around which need to be examined. I give you two examples

    1. The 35 cron IV is the bokeh king
    Just like the new FLE it sometimes gets it badly wrong
    2. The 75 'cron APO is too clinical
    Spend an hour with one and you'll appreciate it's organic and delicate character.

    I've spent a lot of time and a lot of money trying differente eras of lenses, and I've come to the conclusion that the modern lenses have a consistency and character that cannot be matched. Of course this is my opinion, and I fully appreciate that some may prefer the older lenses. But there's no need to qualify this preference by accusing the modern lenses of lacking character.

    I've spent an hour with the new summicron, and I've seen a bunch of images (by better photographers than me ) printed to 6ft. it's gorgeous. Not because it's sharp, but because it's gorgeous! I've been kidnapping grannies all over Norfolk to sell so that I can buy one!

    The new lenses are probably more technically perfect. But this doesn't necessarily imply a loss of character.

    (or you could assume that, having spent so much on modern lenses "he would say that wouldn't he"
    I generally agree that the new lenses are all technically better and still maintain character - it's just a different character than some of the classic cult favorites. I think the sticker shock of the new 50 APO-ASPH Cron shocked most people considering that the current 75 and 90 are also APO Summicron that go for half the price. Begs the question for some as to why this one costs so much more than the other APO-Summicrons.

    I understand the argument is apples to oranges and I'm sure they will develop a future lens shortage with this lens as well. I'd like to have one possibly but it would have to wait until after other pending purchases.
    Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com

  22. #172
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    430
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Just looked at three Summicrons: The Infrared Focus Index for the original Summicron is within the F2 Depth of Field marks. The Collapsible Summicron-M and original Rigid Summicron do not have an IR Index, I assume it might be even better than the 1952 (below SN 1M) lens that has it.

    so Summicrons did not have very far to go to be APO.

    The original Summicron might be the perfect match for an M9M. Slightly Yellowed. Looks great on B&W film. Mine has been to Focalpoint.

  23. #173
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Vivek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    13,604
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian S View Post
    Just looked at three Summicrons: The Infrared Focus Index for the original Summicron is within the F2 Depth of Field marks. The Collapsible Summicron-M and original Rigid Summicron do not have an IR Index, I assume it might be even better than the 1952 (below SN 1M) lens that has it.

    so Summicrons did not have very far to go to be APO.

    The original Summicron might be the perfect match for an M9M. Slightly Yellowed. Looks great on B&W film. Mine has been to Focalpoint.
    Brian, A wealth of information as always.

    Sorry to be redundant- the same question I asked David.

    Why an APO for a monochrome camera?

  24. #174
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1253

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    isn't the idea of the apo to bring a full(er) spectrum of wavelengths into focus at the same focus setting? and therefore it doesn't matter if the sensor is color blind

  25. #175
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Vivek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    13,604
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by jlm View Post
    isn't the idea of the apo to bring a full(er) spectrum of wavelengths into focus at the same focus setting? and therefore it doesn't matter if the sensor is color blind
    That is what I would think but apparently that is not the Leica way? Obviously they know something that I need to be educated on. I will keep an eye on vimeo.

  26. #176
    Subscriber & Workshop Member GrahamWelland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    5,802
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    564

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by jlm View Post
    isn't the idea of the apo to bring a full(er) spectrum of wavelengths into focus at the same focus setting? and therefore it doesn't matter if the sensor is color blind
    That's EXACTLY what it does, so yes I agree with you John.
    Remember: adventure before dementia!

    As Oscar Wilde said, "my tastes are simple, I only like the best"
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  27. #177
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,674
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by fotografz View Post
    I'd tend to agree. The 50 LUX ASPH is a perfect example of a modern lens with lots of character, but not at the expense of other attributes. All my M lenses are modern fast ASPHs save one ... the 90/2.8, which I love for portrait type work and the way it renders.

    I also think the type and quality of light plays a huge role in what is often subscribed as "lens character" ... not to mention the hugh variance in opinions regarding what constitutes good "bokeh."

    At least there is something out there for most everyone's tastes.

    -Marc
    Wow, I had posted a lengthy response for both you and Jono a few minutes ago, but somehow when I came back to this thread..it simply disappeared.

    In any case I agree with you Marc...the 50mm Lux asph is a modern lens that has both character and near flawless optical characteristics. Additionally like yourself and jono, I too love the 90mm f2.8 Elmarit-M...it produces some incredably lovely images.

    It was with certain lenses that were released most recently that I (and some others) felt were becoming too technically perfect compared to having a readily identifying signature. I partially agree with this in some cases and not in others. I'm on the fence regarding the 75mm Cron..but maybe thats after using the 75mm Lux and realizing that the latter has an overabundence amount of character yet when shot even a stop down from max. aperture, can hold it begins to hold its own with some of the best out there. It's this dual character than some miss with lenses that are near perfect from the get-go.

    Again subjectivitiy plays a prominant role.

    Dave (D&A)
    Last edited by D&A; 15th May 2012 at 05:11.

  28. #178
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    430
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Vivek View Post
    Why an APO for a monochrome camera?
    As stated above, Chromatic Aberration softens the image as it spreads-out light of different wavelength. Correcting Chromatic Aberration (CA) optically is more critical for monochrome images as the color information is lost and post-processing cannot be used to minimize the problems.The 5cm F2 Summar is highly corrected for CA, designed at a time when color photography was uncommon.

    The lower-contrast lenses that are highly corrected, such as the Summar, Summitar, Summarit, and early Summicrons should be interesting on this camera. Highly color-corrected for fine detail, low-contrast to compress the intensity range of the scene being recorded.

    On a humorous note: I have a lens that was $40,000 to fabricate- 30 years ago. It was corrected so that all of the bundles of light that entered the lens would stike the image plane in phase, all traveled through the lens in the same amount of time. It was used in an optical computer.

  29. #179
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Not wanting to interfere with this excellent discussion I am reluctant to ask the following question about a very minor aspect of the MM: will it have the sapphire screen of the M9-P?

  30. #180
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1253

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Leica (and hasselblad) distinguish a few of their lenses, but not all, as apochromats. The 75mm cron and the 250 apo (blad) come to mind. all their lenses are corrected for chromatic aberration as well. anyone comment on the difference?

  31. #181
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by jlm View Post
    Leica (and hasselblad) distinguish a few of their lenses, but not all, as apochromats. The 75mm cron and the 250 apo (blad) come to mind. all their lenses are corrected for chromatic aberration as well. anyone comment on the difference?
    The difference between what and what?

    Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish lens designations.

    For example, some Zeiss 35mm manual focus lenses for the Contax 35mm cameras had floating elements to correct near focus, but never advertised the fact, nor used it as a marking on the lens like FLE on other Zeiss lenses.

    My Sony 70-200/2.8G is designated as an APO optic:

    Sony SAL-70200G Zoom AF 70-200mm f/2.8 APO G(D) SSM SAL70200G

    No designation on the lens to confirm that.

    -Marc

  32. #182
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Vivek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    13,604
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by jlm View Post
    Leica (and hasselblad) distinguish a few of their lenses, but not all, as apochromats. The 75mm cron and the 250 apo (blad) come to mind. all their lenses are corrected for chromatic aberration as well. anyone comment on the difference?
    I have lenses from Nikon that are designated APO. They are in a different league of their own. Original prices of them also make the 50AA like a bargain.

    I also have some special UV lenses made by Zeiss. One of them, an UV-Planar 62/2 is corrected from 220nm to 1000nm which make it a bit more APO than the 250mm Hassy Sonnar.

    In comparison, makers like Sigma, Rodenstock and Schneider use APO designations as they wish and they are in a league of their own as well.

    Leica's first APO (that I know) lens, the 180/3.4 Telyt is the first to use the low dispersion fluorite (again that I know of) and such. A true APO lens.

  33. #183
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1253

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    found this:

    Achromat, Apochromat, Superachromat - What is the Difference?

    long story short:
    achromat: basic chromatic aberration is controlled by lens element design and brings most wavelenghts into focus (primary spectrum)

    apochromat: the next level, done by special fluorites, (glass composition), etc. gets rid of the secondary spectrum (what did not get precisely focused by the above). the Leica 75 apo-cron

    superachrormat: even more, specifically important for longer focal lengths, like the blad 250 and 350 superachromats
    Last edited by jlm; 15th May 2012 at 07:03.

  34. #184
    Senior Member bradhusick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA USA
    Posts
    2,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    53

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Trastevere View Post
    Not wanting to interfere with this excellent discussion I am reluctant to ask the following question about a very minor aspect of the MM: will it have the sapphire screen of the M9-P?
    Yes, it will have the sapphire screen.
    Brad Husick

  35. #185
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    rayyan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,887
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    A very knowledgeable and literate dicussion by photographers whose talents and experience far exceeds mine. I mean this very sincerely.

    However, I am just a simple snap shooter, who is lucky to possess some of the lenses being discussed here.

    My take is a very simple one. I just use a lens. I like it or not.

    " When I heard the learn'd astronomer,
    When the proofs, the figures, were ranged in columns before me,
    When I was shown the charts and diagrams, to add, divide, and measure them,
    When I sitting heard the astronomer where he lectures with much applause in the lecture room,
    How soon unaccountable I became tired and sick,
    Till rising and gliding out I wander'd off by myself,
    In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time,

    Look'd up in perfect silence at the stars."

    Whitman; By the roadside.
    koffee & kamera
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  36. #186
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,929
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Godfrey View Post
    In honor of the M9 Monochrom, I just fitted the first roll of XP2 into my 'new' 1971 Nikon F plain prism and stuck the Nikkor 50mm f/1.2 on it. Let's see where the next 24 exposures takes me. :-)
    status report:

    Still working on that 24 exposure roll. I'd forgotten just how heavy a Nikon F was. Swapped to the 85mm f/1.8 for a bit. It is a lovely old beast but damn heavy. So one driver for me in obtaining a Leica MM would be that it weighs in at a bit less than my B&W film camera ... ;-)

    Actually, I saw a report yesterday that if the MM is successful, Leica is considering a Monochrom version of the X2. Now that would be just right ... an X2M with optical viewfinder or EVF would be almost irresistible.

  37. #187
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Vivek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    13,604
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Godfrey View Post
    Actually, I saw a report yesterday that if the MM is successful, Leica is considering a Monochrom version of the X2. Now that would be just right ... an X2M with optical viewfinder or EVF would be almost irresistible.
    Interesting report!

    It is more than likely that one of my NEX' will take that place for me (debayered an all) quite soon.

    I might buy the 50 AA Summicron to see if it would make any difference at all.

  38. #188
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,310
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Just a note on lens character and preference:
    When the 50mm f/1.4 ASPH was introduced, the internet screamed and yelled that it was harsh and had rough bokeh. It was "clinical" and overpriced (at 2500 or so). Now people are saying it has character and nice bokeh and it is sharp without being harsh etc. I have had the lens the whole time, and I don't think it has changed with age!
    On the matter of the 35/1.4 ASPH versus the 35mm f/1.4 FLE, I think apart from their shifting patterns, pretty much anyone would be hard pressed to tell them apart without rigorous testing. You might THINK you can tell them apart, but I have a feeling double blind testing that accounted for sample variation would rule that out pretty fast. Again, I could be wrong, but I don't have a big stake in the game...I sold the ASPH for the FLE, and they look identical to me. I don't feel cheated, as I sold it to fix the focus shift, and it does that brilliantly.

    Finally, on the matter of the 75/2 and 75/1.4, I also have both...got the 75/2 when it came out with the intention of comparing and selling the one I liked better, but I did not want to part with either. Above f/4, I don't think you will be able to tell them apart...at least not in most situations. The 75/1.4 obviously has a crazy look wide open and until about f/2.5, while the 75/2 handles much better and has visibly better optical performance at f/2 to f/4.

    Overall, I think the main thing is to choose what you like! I don't think Leica is going to make any lenses for "character" alone, since what it means varies so greatly to different people. I think Leica has mostly made the lenses as optically perfect as they can for their history. This involves some aesthetic choices in balancing aberrations, but as technology has advanced, more aberrations can be corrected and the lenses keep getting optically better and better. If you LIKE aberrations (they can be nice!), then the thing to do is use any of the older lenses that work on an M...around 80 years worth of choice now. Pick the period you like. Personally, I don't think a technically perfect lens can be regarded as harsh...at least not unless the reality it is transmitting is harsh. If you use a perfect lens on a delicate scene, you are going to get a delicate picture. The lens is just the window to the scene you are trying to show...if you want that scene to be softer, then you need some curtains! Old lenses, vaseline, softars...there are lots of options.

    And what is character? Do old lenses have more character because they look more like the great photos of the past? Did the photographers of the sixties and seventies lament the lack of character in their lenses, so unlike the ones in the 30s and 40s? I mostly use the modern Leica designs as they have what I would consider a pleasing character...they perform very well and do not do anything unduly distracting from the photo.

    Sometimes I will use other lenses if I feel like it will serve a purpose. For example, here's a softy taken with a 1960s Canon 35/1.8 on the M9:



    But on another day, on wanted a more neutral representation of the scene, so I chose a modern Leica lens:
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook
    Likes 5 Member(s) liked this post

  39. #189
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    324
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    hi there
    I can't tell you how much I disagree. The Mandler lenses are lovely, but there are a lot of truths around which need to be examined. I give you two examples

    1. The 35 cron IV is the bokeh king
    Just like the new FLE it sometimes gets it badly wrong
    2. The 75 'cron APO is too clinical
    Spend an hour with one and you'll appreciate it's organic and delicate character.
    My favorite lens for my M9 is my Noct f/1.
    I shoot a lot of cage fighting and sports images with it. It's really my one Leica lens that I feel I can't replicate with anything else.
    The new Noct is fascinating but, to me, ultimately uninvolving.
    The current 50 'lux looks lovely but I can't see replacing my Noct with it so I think I will be forever unfulfilled.

    My least favorite is my 75 'cron APO.
    I have spent a lot more than one hour with it.
    I find it uninteresting and dull. My Nikon 85 f/1.4 on my D3x is far better, in my opinion of course.
    I may get a 75 'lux just so I have at least one lens longer than 50 mm for my M9 that I like.

    I always respect your opinion but I do feel there is more than a kernel of truth to the old saw about Mandler lenses having more character.

    As an aside, I have been shooting Leica RF's since I was 9 years old. I still use the same IIIa that I shot with then. But the new 50'cron has me thinking I may be reaching the end of the line with Leica glass.

    In my last exhibition I had one image that was printed over 100 inches long. I shot it handheld in the studio with my D3x and Nikon 24mm f/1.4. I had plenty of resolution and people could get quite close. If I need more I can get a D800E.

    It is going to be hard to see where $7,000 standard lenses and, probably, $15,000 exotic lenses fit into my workflow. For the studio, I prefer my Nikon. For action, I don't need that kind of resolution, not to mention my focus is never EXACTLY perfect with rapidly moving subjects. Therefore, much of the benefit of the new super lenses would probably be lost.

    My Leica action photos would benefit far more from a camera with a decent buffer, better high ISO and a modern LCD.

    If the M10 does all that I will get one.

    But, Leica glass may be reaching the point where it doesn't help me.

    Also of note, my Olympus EM5 has recently replaced my M9 as my light weight but high quality travel camera.

    Anyway, just musing.

    All the best,

    Bill

    Fashion meets Fighting

    April 2012 – Bill Fulcher |
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  40. #190
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    430
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    The last lens that I used on the M9 was an uncoated 5cm f2 Sonnar from 1935. Last night I modified it to focus to 0.75m, RF coupled. I really want to see what these lenses do on an M9M.

  41. #191
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks


  42. #192
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,674
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart Richardson View Post
    On the matter of the 35/1.4 ASPH versus the 35mm f/1.4 FLE, I think apart from their shifting patterns, pretty much anyone would be hard pressed to tell them apart without rigorous testing. You might THINK you can tell them apart, but I have a feeling double blind testing that accounted for sample variation would rule that out pretty fast. Again, I could be wrong, but I don't have a big stake in the game...I sold the ASPH for the FLE, and they look identical to me. I don't feel cheated, as I sold it to fix the focus shift, and it does that brilliantly.
    Stuart,

    I enjoyed reading much of what you wrote and of course it's all very subjective. The one statement I personally and respectfully would disagree with is your feelings, about the differences (or lack thereof) of the image charateristics of the 35mm Lux asph (pre FLE) vs current FLE version. For myself, I felt image wise these lenses were worlds apart until approx f4.5-5.6 . In fact I and a couple of aquantences actually did very carefully controlled double blind tests and all of us could pick which images went with each lens. We had three pre FLE lenses to test against a FLE lens. This is aside from focus shift of the pre FLE which indeed as you mentioned, was brilliantly fixed with it's successor.

    Ask 100 Leica users about lenses and I suspect one will get close to 100 different opinions...much like ones favorite flavor of ice cream. All good indeed!

    Dave (D&A)
    Last edited by D&A; 18th May 2012 at 05:17.
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  43. #193
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,310
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Thanks Dave. Of course, if you see a difference, I believe you. But is it really "world's apart"? The lenses have essentially the same optical formula...if we are talking ice cream here, it's less like a different ice cream flavor rather than one being in a cone and one being in a cup! Anyway, I agree with you in principal that you ask 100 people and you get 100 answers. I just think sometime's people's passions override their logic in their comparisons of lenses...you build up a lot of fondness for lenses through working with them over the years, and there is the tendency to overstate some of the differences at times, especially since these differences are often hard to measure, difficult to accurately compare across two lenses, and largely governed by personal preference anyway...
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook

  44. #194
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    430
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Hosermage View Post
    I did read that they had to create/agree on a new monochrome DNG file that will work for MM and perhaps other cameras in the future? So, if the SE software process on that new file format, then it's similar to what you suggested?
    There is no need for a change to the DNG file format, which is based on the TIFF 6.0 specification. The TIFF specification from 1992 handles monochrome images (single-plane) and allows the number of bits per sample to be designated. The TIFF spec also allows multiple images from successive frames to be stored in the same file, but few software packages implement that feature. In 1995 I had to write software to parse multiple monochrome images stored in a single file and re-write them 1 image per file. My wife had a 1024x1024 monochrome digital microscope camera and needed to process the images.

    The M9M is a true monochrome camera. The information coming off of the CCD and stored in the files is monochrome. JPEG allows for grey-scale images, as does BMP and others. When looking at the created images on an RGB screen, on your computer it is necessary to take the single pixel value from the grey-scale image and replicate it in the RGB planes of the Video card for display. This is of course true for all grey-scale images that you view on a color screen.

  45. #195
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    430
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: M Monochrom . . . . it's not a review folks

    Quote Originally Posted by dougpeterson View Post
    Wow. Sometimes I forget how lucky we are on GetDPI to have more-often-than-not civilized conversations with differences-in-tastes taken into consideration and appreciation for when someone puts information out into the community.

    Reading through the immature, unappreciative, dismissive banter on Range Finder Forum nearly made me sick to my stomach.

    GetDPI may have ties to "Dante's Inferno". But RFF is truly a descent into hell.
    Hard to believe that the RFF discussion on the Monochrome M9 was well over two years ago.

    Would yo buy a B&W only 16 BIT M9 ? - Rangefinderforum.com

    Near the end, I called Kodak about making a monochrome CCD to replace the one in the M9, they said they could. Roger asked at Photokina about making a Monochrome M9.

    Would yo buy a B&W only 16 BIT M9 ? - Page 7 - Rangefinderforum.com

    What amazes me- Look at the Poll results of the 2+ year old RFF survery and the one on the Leica forum, taken after the camera was introduced.

    Survey: Your opinion about the new LEICA M MONOCHROM - Leica User Forum

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •