Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
+1 . It's of course very subjective, but for the combination of travel photography and also the need to go light but have adaquate coverage, the trio of 21, 35 & 75 has usually been my personal choice.I would take the 35 and the 75 and even that would not be wide enough . Travel photography seems to be about providing some context (where was the photograph taken) with most photographs . So the fisherman but also some of his boat and other people around him . Add a 21/3.4SEM and you have a close to perfect kit.
If those are the lenses you own I would take 35 and 70.Would you take a M9/P/ME and:
1. Lux 50 asph or
2. Lux 35 FLE and a 75 cron apo
For a trip to SE Asia and possibly NZ.
Weight is not a consideration.
Thanks for your input.
No 90?!?My 35 Summilux FLE is never left behind. My most used focal length.
I'm about to leave for Thailand and Cambodia and will take a 15-21-35-50 kit.
You're right, I can't leave the 90 Elmarit-M behind!No 90?!?