Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 32 of 32

Thread: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

  1. #1
    Senior Member bab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    250
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    started this thread to hear some thoughts on our latest offerings of systems out there, the thread is a good basis for many platforms now being offered by all of the existing camera manufacturers. It doesn't have to be Leica 007 vs Canon 5drs it could also include any current, past or future system but should be one that has been announced and that will be available for purchase shortly.

    Minus the cost of either system and the advertizing hype it boils down to practical work flow and practical image quality. Granted each photographer uses a system for many different uses and no system is broad enough to cover all of the imaginative uses for any given photographer. Also the systems yet to be released in the next 5 years may or may not render any of the current crop inferior as to their image making ability.

    I find the complexity of menus in a camera not used on a daily basis to be a deal killer in real life situation ex. OLY when you need to make the tool work for you. I like the fact or the feeling one gets picking up a camera to ones eye and being able to shoot and not think about the tool your shooting with but instead the image you trying to make. For example my big complaint I have with my M240 is I always shoot the person to high in the frame I have to constantly remind myself to lower the top of the camera frame (or raise the lens higher) to more center the person...seems I'm always pointed slightly down.

    The AF system of the 007 seems promising especially with the front, back and focus DOF readings on the cameras screen. I like the fact you can use the camera in Spot-AF with real time focusing. The Canon has Cross-type AF points claiming greater autofocus precision and better focus tracking (its always been great). Whether either will prove out in real use other than marketing Hype is yet to be realized.

    HIGH-ISO at high ISO and shooting in light other that bright daylight or studio lighting and I'm not referring to the extremes of either end. The high MPix of these cameras demand fast shutter speeds the standard (250mm = 1/250 second, 90mm = 1/90 second) old rules might not apply here they might have to be doubled to reduce vibrations hand held. (This would have been an opportunist time for either manufacturer to introduce 5 axis sensor vibration. I wouldn't worry about 6400 ISO and shooting a indoor scene I'm more talking about the range of ISO 1600-3200 and the cameras ability to focus in that light and my ability to see through the viewfinder what exactly the hell I'm doing!

    I wonder which camera in your hands or mine is better balanced with your ability to hand hold and get a better hit rate based on ones ability to gain better vision through the view finder, the actuation of the shutter and or combination of back button pre focus and the fine tuning with manual focus. Also checking the focus area of importance and seeing the real raw histogram of that area before making a series of 100 images is a big plus in my work.

    Files straight out of the camera and imported into your favorite processing program showing how little or maybe not even any work ones needs to make to the RAW files would be another issue to contemplate. Getting accurate color and being able open shadows or back down highlights or for lack of better words who's file has just a more mailable tolerance and for what images.

    In the field shooting wide angle landscapes on a tripod the sensor and the micro lenses of either should produce very different results just as using either system with an 85mm shooting portraits hand held will for different reasons. These and other situations are thoughts in my mind as to Leica discussions make public as to why they stayed with the MPx sensor at 37mp and didn't go to the 50 mark maybe eliminating some serious risks that would unveil themselves using the high MP sensor, using lenses with limiting auto focus motors, lower F stop diffraction, speed, blur, weight and size, coatings, scales, and available filters.

    As we discussed baring the costs of the two systems because in a real working world job after job it doesn't matter what does matter is the time you've spent on the workflow and the finished results.

    If you had your choice of one or two systems to use on a daily basis to fill you needs what would you choose and why?

    Would this next system of acquisition have longevity and if so how long would you expect it to have. Will any of these newer systems really give you "increased quality and higher speed"?

    Would you buy into the Leica, Canon, Nikon or other new systems because its scary how much more storage and work one will need to do the same job as before with a 20MPx sensor or will you being doing less work because of a particular feature(s) your next tool offers?

    I have a million other questions but I'm out of time now.

    Regards

    BAB

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    33
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    i think the only? way to get medium format look on 35mm is with otus lenses

    and the leica system or phase one would make you stand out though...

  3. #3
    Workshop Member glenerrolrd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Jupiter FL/Atlanta GA
    Posts
    2,279
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Photographs taken with Medium Format can often have a very special aesthetic (look) that is preferred by many photographers . You can not duplicate this with a smaller sensor . The Leica S system or for that matter any of the MF systems (HB,Phase,Pentax) can all produce terrific image quality . At normal ISO s up to 400-800 it is unlikely that any FF system can produce better image quality .

    The Leica S system has the CS lenses which make high speed synch with strobes possible .

    The FF systems have however closed the gap on MF image quality and can better it in situations where extreme DR or high ISO is required .

    In almost every other area ...the new FF cameras will outperform MF .

    If your work is dependent on efficiency ..the FF alternatives will surely be the better solution . If its based on achieving a “signature” aesthetic with consistent high image quality ...I would favor MF .

    You can make either alternative the basis for a terrific professional system .neither starting point will be particularly easy .
    Roger Dunham
    http://rogerdunham.com/
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    I've used pretty much every system out there. I won't get into details but I will say this.

    Canon/Nikon/Sony - All very competent systems that can handle 100% of the demands a client would have. Allows you to be lazy (if you want to be), and has a moderate amount of joy. The three different systems handle colors slightly different, and the ergonomics are slightly different as well.

    Why choose an M-system. For the joy of using a rangefinder (if you find joy in that). To challenge yourself. And for the slightly different colors and vastly different ergonomics. I can use the M-system for 100% of my clients needs. I'm sure some could argue that you can't do XYZ with the M-system.. But that doesn't pertain to me - or I'll find a workaround. Don't chose the M-system for image quality alone (although IMHO it has the best IQ of the lot). Your clients won't recognise it. By all means choose it for IQ, if it gives you joy. Or if it makes your life easier on the computer while editing (I find it makes for easier editing). The lenses really help with this due to the variety of character among all the lenses.

    Why choose an S-system. Because you like the way the lenses render. You're not going to get such a hike in quality that your client will recognise. Also because you like the mailability of the files while editing. And because you like the colors. Don't choose it because it's Medium format.. The format has little impact when all is said and done. The AF and overall speed is behind that of all the cameras listed above. I can focus my RF at least twice as fast as the S-system. And I don't think AF has been vastly improved in the 007. Although I hope ISO has.. As I think these days clean 3200 is a necessity (I swear jobs have gotten darker in the last few years).


    What do I have?
    1) S-system (recent, but like the way the lenses render) could do with two-three stops better ISO and a slightly faster more responsive overall camera. + faster AF.

    2) M-system - I use this for 99% of my client work. I get the most joy out of using a RF system. And the IQ gives me the most joy. Plus editing the files is easier for me. Also the in focus keeper rate is higher then my 1Dx (and my 1Dx is phenomenal). But I'm very comfortable with the M-system. Why do I use the Canon system at all.. Times that I'm bored. Boring client, boring job. Don't feel like using an RF. Need on camera flash for the whole job. Lots of reasons, but most of the time I use the M240 because it's lighter and I'm confident in my ability to hit focus, so it's also fuss free for me. Plus again, what a joy to use.. Makes me feel alive. Could do with 1-stop cleaner ISO. Leica needs to tweak color profile a slight bit. Maybe add some film emulation options to the JPGs.

    3) Canon system - now being replaced by the A7-system (for the second time in recent history). Again, this is just my security blanket system, it gets so little use that I'm going to switch to A7II cameras.. Mainly so the wife has an easier time when she's helping me out.. She actually likes the A7II and the FE lenses, so it's a win win. I couldn't care less to be honest, I won't use the Sony or the Canon setup.



    I guess to directly answer your questions. Most camera systems these days are capable of shooting anything a client needs. I could meet 90% of my clients needs with the 5D Classic. So the choice from here on out, really is just personal preference. What system speaks to you color wise. Ergonomics, fun factor.
    I think it's better to pick a system where you're happy shooting. Then IQ is a consideration but only during the editing process (do you get the colors you like). Lastly you should worry about format. I have a friend who only shoots with M4/3 and he makes a good living.


    Some direct answers:

    Subjects move fast. You need 125th at a minimum (with any system) even though I can hold my M240 still at 15th of a second with a 50mm of wider lens. For the S-system 250th is comfortable with 70mm and wider, at 120mm/180mm you're going to want 500th of a second. I've gotten away with 125, but only in ideal situations. If I'm using on camera flash and the room is right, I can get 60th or 90th and fantastic results. If the room isn't right for it, I stick to 125th with flash. Again flash work is really dependant on personal style.

    I think ISO 3200 is good enough for most fast lenses. Anything darker and it's almost not a point to take a photo.. Since you subject is going to be horribly lit anyway.. Better to learn on camera flash at that point. And for still life, obviously just use a tripod.

    Balance in hands - The lighter camera obviously.. Especially after the 10 hour mark. I'm dying holding two 1Dx cameras after 10 hours. I can comfortably move into the 15 hour mark before I'm annoyed with two M240 cameras. And yes in Asian weddings can easily go on for that long. I spent three hours shooting with the S-system, and I was fine. But I can tell you this. Had I been using two S-cameras, I would probably start getting annoyed at the 6 hour mark.

    Just based on workflow. I am very comfortable with the M240 and I find the lenses have such character that I could probably get the best OOC JPG files from it. Second would be the S-system since the lenses are more neutral. I have an order for the other systems, but I think you're only really curious about the S&M (Canon/Nikon/Sony all fall behind anyway).
    Give me some time on this, and my opinion may change. Then again, I might get the S-007 before I fully learn the S-006.
    To also add, I find that my M240 is most accurate.. But it's also the camera I've spent the most time color profiling etc. So you get what you put in I suppose.

    I could use a D700 plus some G lenses (that camera is damn old). And I'd get the same if not better results then the newer cameras. With enough time, I think I will feel the same way about the S-006. The M240 is leagues better then the M9. And definitely something that doesn't need to be upgraded as long as it keeps working, I can keep using it. And I think as long as a camera focuses fast (be it you focusing it, or it focusing itself) and as long as it has 3200 iso that's relatively clean. You're not needing much else. These days with all the adapters, the sky is the limit for lens choices.

    I hate the MP race. But I see the "need" for it with certain clients. If you're using MP as a crutch for cropping, then you're not doing your job. Two cameras would work, like A7s and A7r... Sony's doing good with their line deviations.

    To end it all off..

    Canon/Nikon/Sony = less work. And I don't think "new features" will make my life easier. Super fast accurate AF + high clean ISO would be awesome, and welcome.

    M-System/S-system = joy to edit.

    M-system = Joy to use. And the reason I haven't quit photography as a profession.


    Obviously I can't fall asleep.. Hope I don't bore anyone who actually reads this
    Likes 4 Member(s) liked this post

  5. #5
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    aDam007, that was a great summary thank you!

    Do you think you can see a difference between Leica's CCD and CMOS sensors?

    best regards

  6. #6
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Many questions here being mixed....

    I get the best IQ with the Leica S 006.
    1) I think the lenses in combination with the larger sensor draw beautiful, specially a smooth transition from the focused plane to the background, also very natural skintones, and very smooth color and tonal transition.
    2) I think the big viewfinder also helps a lot...You really see what you shoot and you see where you have focused. Even manual focus work quite good
    3) And is slower than a DSLR but then I still seem to manage to get the shots I want. I "produce" less quantaty but better quality
    Still its limited in regards to lower light

    I even recently sold my 5dIII+lenses

    I also do like the M-system for the rangefinder experience/seeing around the frame and the excellent and fast primes and the simple user interface.

    The mirrorless crowd seems to work quite good and to deliver quite good IQ but I am confused by the many menues/buttons and functions.
    My favorite mirrorless system is the Leica T at the moment. Technically the Sony A7II might be better and the EM1 might be faster (I also won these two) but the T has very good lenses, a very simple and intuitive user interface and I do like the IQ.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Quote Originally Posted by coz View Post
    aDam007, that was a great summary thank you!

    Do you think you can see a difference between Leica's CCD and CMOS sensors?

    best regards
    Yes. Mainly it affects SOOC JPG files.
    By the time you've profiled both cameras, and have shot them side by side. You can remove most if not all the differences between the two sensors.

    Any differences SOOC are caused by a number of factors.. CCD vs CMOS is a small almost non-existent fraction. It's easier to get a M240 file to look like an M9 file, which is the most important thing. Since the M240 is newer.

    I don't want to start a crazy debate/rumour, but the main difference between the M9 and M240 is the sensor glass reflections. And this is apparent between lenses. And in certain lighting conditions. Neither is better or worse, but it does cause some lenses to act better on the M9 or M240. I ran tests ages ago when the M240 first came out. To be fair, it's not that big a deal.

    I'd like to add that Paratom's points are spot on.

  8. #8
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Thanks guys. I'm debating an S 006/007

  9. #9
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Quote Originally Posted by coz View Post
    Thanks guys. I'm debating an S 006/007
    I have used a M9 and M type 240 for moths and finally kept the new M.

    2 or 3 steps better high ISO would extend the areas where you could use the S.
    I will keep my S 006 and wait and see how the S007 performs and how prices develop.

  10. #10
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    I've had a M9 and MM. I havent tried the M240 yet. I demo'd the S006 recently and really enjoyed it. I like your idea of pairing the two though makes sense.

  11. #11
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Quote Originally Posted by coz View Post
    I've had a M9 and MM. I havent tried the M240 yet. I demo'd the S006 recently and really enjoyed it. I like your idea of pairing the two though makes sense.
    The only thin is that both are kind of slow . So I think it males sense to also have something like a MIrrorless like Oly or Sony or Leica T in addition for long Tele, Zoom and for going to the beach swimming or skiing or riding the bike.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    You know where the high ISO helps. It's everyday situations where you find yourself shooting at ISO 1600 just to get 250th of a second shutter.. ISO 1600 on the S-006 is pretty bad. So if the 007 is 2-3 stops better that's ideal. And worth the extra $$.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,311
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    My main job is as a printer, and with that comes the advantage of seeing the output of a lot of different cameras. One generalization I feel comfortable making is that the megapixel rating is really only one component of the imaging chain, and often not the most important. More important is the quality of the image at full resolution. When you look at the 100% detail, how does it appear to you? Crisp and clean with good contrast and no digital artifacts or smoothing? Is it sharp to the edges and corners and is the color good? Then you will get a great print, even at 120dpi (or less for really large prints).

    So how does this translate to actual cameras?

    1. It means that superior lenses are the most important criteria -- the cameras tend to be capable of showing off all your lens deficiencies, so you better have a good lens and use it at its good apertures.

    2. It means avoiding most noise reduction and smoothing unless absolutely necessary. This also extends to AA filters. When you look at 100% detail and there is a blurred character and/or loss of contrast, this is often due to an AA filter. This slight blurring will be less slight when you are printing a medium to large print, and it comes across as unnatural and sacrifices your image quality. Fine grain actually helps control this and appears more natural. Without an AA filter you do need to control moire, but this is something better done in post in most situations.

    3. Assuming similar megapixel ratings and sensor generations, it means that larger sensors with more conservative ratings tend to look better than smaller sensors with higher pixel densities. Yes, megapixels aren't everything, and sensor size is not always a cure-all either. In film, I find I get better results out the of Mamiya 7II than I do out of 4x5, as the camera is more ergonomic, the lenses are better and have more DOF, there is less wind effects and film-flatness/camera rigidity problems and I can expose more quickly and efficiently. Sure, in the best possible situation 4x5 will have more resolution, but for my uses the Mamiya 7II makes much better images. If the 5ds style of shooting fits yours better than the S, then it will of course make better pictures for you!

    So in this context, my guess would be that while the new 5D might have the potential for higher resolution, we will need to see what it really looks like at its 100% detail to see how good that detail is. Pretty much everyone would agree that 12mp from the Sony A7s looks better than 12mp from a smartphone...I am surely biased to some degree, but I have not seen any sensors from Canon, Nikon, Sony or Fuji etc that look better than the output from the S and S2. I have seen some really lovely output from Hasselblad sensors as well, but nothing I have seen so far comes close in the smaller realms other than perhaps the M9 and A7s. I have both, so I know that they have very nice character at 100% detail, but even they don't come that close to S or S2's character at 100%. So unless Canon can crack that particular nut, I don't think the image quality from the 5Dsr will be as compelling as that from the S, particularly if you use it with the typical stable of Canon lenses.

    This is also leaving aside handling and user experience. After using the S and S2, it is very hard to go back to a more standard DSLR. Even though I am quite enamored by the size and capabilities of the A7s, the user-experience is miserable compared to the S.
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook
    Likes 6 Member(s) liked this post

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,311
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Sorry, I know that was quite a rambling post! I will state a few more things though, that are perhaps more directly relevant to your question:

    I had the S2 for three years before upgrading to the S, which I got at a very good price since the 007 had been announced. I bought it primarily for the updated warranty and few extra features, and intend to sell the S2 when the dust has settled and it is all burnt-in and working 100% (I find my Leica systems often take a bit to even out).

    The S2 was the best camera I had ever used up to the point that I got the S. Both of them are a joy to work with, and the output from the camera is more consistently excellent than anything else I have ever worked with or seen. Out of camera, the color is excellent, and I find that I have an extremely high percentage of keepers (from a technical standpoint!). The vast majority of pictures are focused properly, exposed properly and white-balanced properly. But it goes beyond just that...they look NATURAL to me. I do not get that feeling from other digital cameras. In terms of handling, it is very intuitive and extremely well thought out and executed. In fact, I often keep to P mode in daylight and keep an eye on it, as the camera tends to make the same choices that I would make. When it doesn't, switching to A or M is very quick and easy, and the top-mounted shutter speed dial and rear thumb control are tactile and extremely simple to operate. They are located where they should be located and do what they should do. There is no crowding or button overload.

    For me at least, there is almost no struggle in using the camera...so little about it is aggravating or problematic in use. You can just stop mucking about and photograph pictures of extremely high technical quality. To me, that is the most important measure of a camera.
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook
    Likes 7 Member(s) liked this post

  15. #15
    Senior Member JohnBrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    532
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Stuart, those are excellent posts. Thank you. I've struggled for several years now about whether or not to buy into the S system. I have an M system, but my main camera for landscape is a D810 and the better Zeiss glass.
    What puts me off the S are the many reports of failures in the field - either the body or the lenses (and most particularly the two lenses I would want to have for the S - the 35 and 120). The only camera I have ever had fail was a 617, which broke a film winder. There were times I used to carry a back up but never having had a failure I stopped with the back up. The Leica S is a heavy unit, even heavier than the Nikon/Zeiss setup, and to carry my M setup as a backup is just too much weight for my poor beat up back.
    All that said when others were reporting problems with the M digital's, none of mine (M8, 8.2, 9P & M-P) ever gave even a hiccup.
    I will continue to read these threads as the interest remains high - I would probably need a money-back guarantee to dip my toe in the water.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,311
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Hi John,
    I really can't answer your question other than to say that I have indeed had some problems in the S system, but none of them stopped me from making photos in the field. My first S2 did not AF correctly out of the box. MF was fine. It was replaced by Leica immediately and without hesitation. My 70mm lens did not seem to be evenly sharp across the frame in some images. It was spectacularly sharp in most situations, but at certain apertures and distances, it displayed odd behavior. Leica replaced it without qualms when I showed them the issue. The replacement is fine. I am also very demanding, as I live in a country with very demanding landscapes (lots of clutter-free foregrounds, tons of detail and little atmospheric haze) and print very large.

    Any problem I have had has been dealt with extremely well and very quickly. That is all I can ask. I don't think reading reports on particular lenses failing is necessarily productive. Few people write about their lens NOT failing. Personally, I am more concerned with how they respond to problems, rather than whether or not they occur. I also don't think that the chance that the camera might fail is a reason to choose a worse camera...the camera might also fail. If the better camera fails, you are still going to be using a much better camera for the 99% of the time that the camera is around. For the 1% of the time it is not, you still have an M system!

    The weight is an issue, but I did not find it that much heavier than other DSLR setups with bigger lenses. If you are concerned by weight, the 100mm f/2 might be an interesting consideration. As long as you don't need the central shutter or to focus closer than .7m (which is fairly close for a 100mm!), it would be a good alternative. The S lens performance is so high that there is likely not much between them in performance, particularly at landscape apertures.
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  17. #17
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Thanks for your comments Stuart. I'm about to dip[ my toe into the S-006 I think. Much appreciated.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  18. #18
    Member msadat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Hermosa Beach, CA
    Posts
    195
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    I have the s system with all the lenses and it is my main camera. i have not had any issues with my system. on the S2 focus could be a little tricky but i have learned to deal with it. i will upgrade to a pair of 007 once the dust settles and prices new/used are more reasonable.

    I am glad that now sony, canon and nikon all have high res cameras. this will pressure leica to better price their cameras. i can live with the lens prices given i keep them for a very long time. but bodies are a different story.

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnBrew View Post
    Stuart, those are excellent posts. Thank you. I've struggled for several years now about whether or not to buy into the S system. I have an M system, but my main camera for landscape is a D810 and the better Zeiss glass.
    What puts me off the S are the many reports of failures in the field - either the body or the lenses (and most particularly the two lenses I would want to have for the S - the 35 and 120). The only camera I have ever had fail was a 617, which broke a film winder. There were times I used to carry a back up but never having had a failure I stopped with the back up. The Leica S is a heavy unit, even heavier than the Nikon/Zeiss setup, and to carry my M setup as a backup is just too much weight for my poor beat up back.
    All that said when others were reporting problems with the M digital's, none of mine (M8, 8.2, 9P & M-P) ever gave even a hiccup.
    I will continue to read these threads as the interest remains high - I would probably need a money-back guarantee to dip my toe in the water.
    Last edited by msadat; 24th March 2015 at 12:21.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  19. #19
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Shashin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    4,505
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    141

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    I have used a Pentax 645D and Nikon D800. You could argue the D800 is the equal or superior to the Pentax. On paper it is really impressive. I just prefer using the Pentax. I find the images more natural. I prefer the economics. The viewfinder goes hands down to the Pentax--I really have a hard time with small 35mm viewfinders. (I grew up with film and so 35mm viewfinders are small [APS are ridiculous).) As far as the economics, I can afford the Pentax. True, the D800 is cheaper, but I get better images out of the Pentax. So how much do less satisfying images cost?

    I guess you are going to have to use the cameras and figure it out...

  20. #20
    Senior Member bab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    250
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    So after buying and using several generations of dsrl's you still didn't outlay 25k and your using features and a sensor that's two years ahead of a leica 007. That's in terms OF ISO, FPS shooting and a few other advantages in automation. What I don't understand is what marketing sense does a long life span of lenses have in common with a body and firmware that's (006) years behind a 3-5k body, when it seems all to possible to have made a better body for significantly less money with more advantageous features and capture more market share?

  21. #21
    Senior Member bab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    250
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Used S2's are 7500.00 and really only good for bright light or studio light so it would make sense to purchase a (007) if one were going to use the leica lens system in other lighting situations!
    Not willing to spend 25k for a new leica s means waiting at least a year from now for the used price to be 12-15k. If no other choice was available purchasing a new Leica s007 is a no brainier, if a new leica was $12k it's a no brainer. How could a 12k leica S007 body not sell more leica glass and put leica in more photographers hands thus creating more revenue?
    That being said I believe at least 3-4 camera manufactures will by 2016 - 2017 release new equipment that will make this conversation meaningless.

  22. #22
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Quote Originally Posted by bab View Post
    Used S2's are 7500.00 and really only good for bright light or studio light so it would make sense to purchase a (007) if one were going to use the leica lens system in other lighting situations!
    Not willing to spend 25k for a new leica s means waiting at least a year from now for the used price to be 12-15k. If no other choice was available purchasing a new Leica s007 is a no brainier, if a new leica was $12k it's a no brainer. How could a 12k leica S007 body not sell more leica glass and put leica in more photographers hands thus creating more revenue?
    That being said I believe at least 3-4 camera manufactures will by 2016 - 2017 release new equipment that will make this conversation meaningless.
    First of all I can say from my experience that S2 is not only good for studio or bright light. For sure its not a low light camera but you can do more things with it than you might believe. The mirror is very well damped and even though DR goes down and there will be noise ISO640 can produce very nice images and good color as well. An important part are also the lenses which are very good even wide open, and fast, and not much vignetting which needs to be corrected.

    Regarding "dated" cameras...maybe yes if calulated DR numbers and things like that are your criteria. If you just take images and look on them the story can look different.
    For me important factors are also:
    Lenses
    -How accurate can you focus in AF (the S is very good here, not fast but -accurate due to the information on its chip no need for hours of AF-fine tuning like many other DSLRs)
    -viewfinder - how good can you see the subject; ist it good to check focus? Is it possible to use it reliable for manual focus?
    -user interface
    -handling
    -IQ (visual - not only in numbers and measurements)

    I think the best thing is to demo a camera, use it and look at the images. Everything else is a lot of theory but doesnt necessarily lead you to the right decision.
    Likes 5 Member(s) liked this post

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Quote Originally Posted by bab View Post
    Used S2's are 7500.00 and really only good for bright light or studio light so it would make sense to purchase a (007) if one were going to use the leica lens system in other lighting situations!
    Not willing to spend 25k for a new leica s means waiting at least a year from now for the used price to be 12-15k. If no other choice was available purchasing a new Leica s007 is a no brainier, if a new leica was $12k it's a no brainer. How could a 12k leica S007 body not sell more leica glass and put leica in more photographers hands thus creating more revenue?
    That being said I believe at least 3-4 camera manufactures will by 2016 - 2017 release new equipment that will make this conversation meaningless.
    What I will say is this, and I've said it before.

    The Leica S is a good system. Good enough that they don't need to put a luxury price tag on it. You're absolutely right when you say they should have a lower priced body. If it were relatively competitive at around 10k-12k for the body, and the lenses were priced the same as they are now. They'd have a lot more lens sales. A reasonably priced body builds confidence in the brand. And with bodies needing the be replaced more often, it's better to build a large user base with the lure of cheaper bodies, then to try and sell expensive outdated units to the few.

    Who knows, maybe the new CEO will do things differently.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Quote Originally Posted by Paratom View Post
    First of all I can say from my experience that S2 is not only good for studio or bright light. For sure its not a low light camera but you can do more things with it than you might believe. The mirror is very well damped and even though DR goes down and there will be noise ISO640 can produce very nice images and good color as well. An important part are also the lenses which are very good even wide open, and fast, and not much vignetting which needs to be corrected.

    Regarding "dated" cameras...maybe yes if calulated DR numbers and things like that are your criteria. If you just take images and look on them the story can look different.
    For me important factors are also:
    Lenses
    -How accurate can you focus in AF (the S is very good here, not fast but -accurate due to the information on its chip no need for hours of AF-fine tuning like many other DSLRs)
    -viewfinder - how good can you see the subject; ist it good to check focus? Is it possible to use it reliable for manual focus?
    -user interface
    -handling
    -IQ (visual - not only in numbers and measurements)

    I think the best thing is to demo a camera, use it and look at the images. Everything else is a lot of theory but doesnt necessarily lead you to the right decision.

    Also agree with this.. The camera isn't "dated" I find that the images I get from the S are beautiful. I think slightly faster AF and better high ISO would be welcome. But honestly the AF and ISO now aren't crippling by any means.

    BAB had a really good point though about the price of the body... Doesn't inspire confidence when you look at the numbers and then see the shockingly high price.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  25. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    49
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    "A lower priced body" would result in a bigger loss on bodies. Maybe a corresponding increase in lens sales would produce a profit.

    I want a 24mm S lens, but arrrrghhh !

  26. #26
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    I'm going to go at this from a bit different perspective.

    Based on a lot of experience in creative endeavors, including making photographs for a wide range of clients, and doing that for over 40 years, there is a lot to be said about what sparks self-confidence in your work and what doesn't. Over time I've observed that personal creative satisfaction is a huge component in building one's confidence in the results one produces.

    While clients, or casual viewers (and even other photographers) may not be able to tell the difference between one technical solution verses another, what counts more ... is whether you do, or even just think you do! If you aren't convinced, it can undermine both the "joy of doing", and "faith in the results". Nothing succeeds like success!

    If there is a debatable area technically, there is rarely a grey area regarding an instinctive response to a photographer that is confident in presenting themselves, their work, and they way they solve problems.

    The tools used are the domain of the creative person ... clients, buyers of your photography, or the "interested" public at large, do not care what tools are used, they are results oriented ... and part of that reaction is projected by how confident one is in those results, and that the results back up that confidence.

    I've found this to be true in every creative field I've been exposed to ... advertising, design, music, painting/fine art, and photography ... both as a buyer of creative work, and a producer of creative work. One common element for success in every field was the unshakable confidence on the part of the creative person. It is something you can feel from both the person and the work.

    That is why one responder here can confidently say they use a Leica Rangefinder for 99% of their client work. Their success with the M builds the confidence to stick with it and flourish ... even though a rangefinder is a limited system in the eyes of many others.

    What my friend Irakly Shanidze produces with an "outdated" M9 is extraordinary, and his confidence in the tool and its use is apparent in the results. Even though I do not do work like Stuart Richardson, I greatly admire his quiet confidence and the sublime feelings he manages to evoke with his Leica S photographs.

    IMHO:

    Personally, I have creative confidence in some of my current photographic tools, and have come to understand both the strengths and limitations of each one as they relate directly to MY creative needs, level of skill, and any talent I may have ... not anyone else's.

    I'm only interested in preserving those strengths and building on using them more and more effectively ... and am not willing to let go of those strengths, if they are undermined by the next iteration of that specific tool. So, I'm not particularly "concerned" by what may come since I'm both confident in my current selections, and the the level of success I've managed to achieve with them. I change cameras when my needs change, not because some new wonder cam hits the market.

    Currently I use a S(006), mostly as a vessel to hold the CS and S lenses I find unique and satisfying. The limitations of this camera are of little concern to me since I don't need ISO 3200 to shoot with strobes, nor have I ever hit the buffer limit. I use lighting because low light is far to often ugly light ... even with color digital cameras that can shoot at astoundingly high ISOs, I rarely if ever go there for the same reason.

    However, I also use the S to shoot available light at weddings and for portraits all the time ... IF the available light is beautiful. The S camera can do more than what most think it can ... but it takes practice and perseverance to develop the skills and techniques required ... which takes a little time, something that seems to be missing in our throw-away, jump from one-kit-to-another, market hype driven world.

    Another favorite is my Leica M Monochrome Rangefinder ... always used for available light candid works where color temp issues of the low available light are non-existent. The M has been a continuous tool for me during the entire 40+ year span I've been making photographs. 99% of those images were B&W, so the MM was a natural choice.

    The third tool is my iPhone 6 ... which I take with when shooting the MM to text no-brainer color snaps to friends and family since that stuff is "here today, gone today". I used to shoot those pics with a "real" camera which was just a big PITA to let people see quickly ... and they couldn't care less what was used anyway.

    I have a Sony A99 and A7R system (and Nikon kit before that, and Canon system before that) that I never have had a whisper of attachment to, or care for, but they DID get the job done for some wedding work ... which I am retiring from this summer and will probably sell it all off since I rarely use any of it for any work I actually WANT to do.

    - Marc

    BTW, I have never sweated carrying lighting or a larger camera like an Pro Canon/Nikon or Hasselblad H/Leica S for 8 to 10 hours. That's why God made assistants and/or roller bags. It kills me when someone complains that it cost $100 to hire an assistant, while they use their $25,000 camera and bag of $7K-8K lenses
    Likes 7 Member(s) liked this post

  27. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    46
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    I have been using the Leica S2 since 2010, and I have been using it as my exclusive camera since 2011. I use it for my artistic work, family photographs and other tasks. Last week I shot my daughter's high school lacrosse games a couple of times. Although not every shot was a keeper, a high percentage were. One area that the 007 will help with such assignments is it will have a new autofocus system that will be better for the continuous autofocus system. Also be aware that the 007 might not be available until the 3rd quarter.

    Scott

  28. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Quote Originally Posted by Rolo View Post
    "A lower priced body" would result in a bigger loss on bodies. Maybe a corresponding increase in lens sales would produce a profit.

    I want a 24mm S lens, but arrrrghhh !
    Hi Gary, I got the 24mm two weeks ago and I can tell you it's a fantastic lens. I'm not particularly a wide angle type of photographer, but the oppertunaty was there and I thought it might be interesting to go 'all out wide' and see what I get. My first S lenses were the 70 and the 120 because those angles are closest to how I see the world around me, and I need those focal lenghts most for my type of images.

    I can say that to me, the 24 is everything I've come te expect from an S lens. Nice color and contrast and - need I say - it's sharp, sharp, sharp. My expectations for the bokeh this lens delivers were not high, because of the wide angle and it being an f3.5, but I'm actually positively surprised by the background defocus possibilities. At wide open, at medium focus distances, the centre to 2/3 way out is already very sharp and the corners get softer, but not harsh or busy looking.

    At f8 - f11 the corners are nicely sharp and it's a great landscape lens because of that. I plan to also use it for reportage because with the 24mm, like the 70 and 120 that need 2x FL shutterspeed, I've found I can do quite well with 1/60. Wide open at 640-800 ISO, this gets me close to what I need for not too dark places, though the new 007 would probably be very helpful in those circumstances. Since we have 37,5 MP to play with, I can easily crop out the extreme corners when I feel the subject gets pushed too far back because of the extreme wide angle.

    As for the price of the S cameras, it is what is. Sure, I'd very much like to be able to buy the new S for 10.000 and sure, Leica would sell more cameras if the price were lower, but you know, they can sell them at 23.000. Probably more than they can produce the coming one, two years ...

    I agree with everybody here that a lower price would help make a larger user base for the S system and that would be a good thing.

    Cheers,

    Peter
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  29. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    49
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Hi, Peter,
    Thanks for the benefit of your experience. Leica loaned me a 24mm for 2 weeks at the end of last year for a trip to Venice, Italy. I took the opportunity to shoot 300 frames with it and a selection of 6 of these are shown at the end of this album: https://www.flickr.com/photos/roloph...7642515528753/

    I found it to be fabulous and I especially like it because I prefer 1:1, or 5:4 crops and this gives me the width on the short side that I need. I am/was very happy with it, but here it sells for 6,500 which is a step to be taken carefully.

    Above, I wasn't giving an opinion on the cost of ownership, just sharing info on the cost on supplying this kit. Of course I'd like prices to drop, although I consider the current S-E to be a reasonable price (relatively) and that's why I updated my S2 recently. I've currently got the 35mm and 70mm, plus a V adapter an a bunch of V lenses that would fund the 24mm, for sure.

    Thanks again.

    Gary
    .
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/rolophoto/
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  30. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    Hi Gary, thanks, these are excellent shots you made in Venice, not only with the 24mm, I like the complete series. I'd seen some of those shots before on your Facebook.

    The 24mm is really great for those crops you mentioned and as someone who is not used to the wide angle FOV, let alone a so-called extreme wide angle, I agree that the extra 'headroom' every shot gets vertically (in landscape) has me pleasantly surprised, in that it kind of automatically gives compositions I did not 'see' before.

    As for the whole price-thing, my contribution on that part wasn't aimed at you directly. I'm sorry, I should have made that more clear. Anyway, I'm with everyone who says the price of entry into the S system is too high for the system to get a (relatively) large(r) user base. Especially with regards to the 'competition' from the upcoming 50 MP FF's. Look at the thread title of this thread. And the OP is certainly not the only one who asks these kind of questions.

    I frequent the MF forum over at LuLa and it seems that this question (is Medium Format really that much better?) is on everyones mind, these days. And for good reason. Not that I'd want to trade in my 'old tech' S2-P for a modern CaNikon or Sony, but I can certainly understand young photographers who are going to need to invest, wondering if the extra 10-20K is going to give the ROI they need to grow their business. Because of that, I'd want Leica to rethink their pricing policy, get those people on board, now.

    But like I said, I believe Leica thinks they'll sell enough 007's as it is.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  31. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Near Brussels, Belgium, Europe
    Posts
    541
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    +1 for the 24mm S.
    I recently put mine for sale in here but still have hard time deciding if it's the good decision.
    This lens is just brilliant. I like to use it for 2x1 pano when stitching is not possible (moving subjects or shooting from a boat, etc).
    My problem with it is related to perspective control for architecture.
    I miss my Cambo and Phase back for that purpose. With no software correction I get better (meaning more consistent) results with the Leica (no need for color cast / vigneting correction etc) and the Leica is easier and faster to use than the tech. cam. But it is another story when software perspective correction needs to be applied on the S24mm. Corners can start to be ugly when severe corrections are applied.
    ps: also tested the Sony A7r + Canon 24mm T/S against the S 24mm software corrected for perspectives and the Leica easily beats the Sony/Canon system (corners are waaaaay sharper).
    ___________________________________
    http://www.vincent-angillis.be
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  32. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    820
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica 007 and Canon 5ds/5dsr ETC thoughts

    I cannot justify paying the $25,400 US for an S-007 simply because history has shown that within 2 years the current S-bodies are on Ebay and elsewhere for $10,000. ($25,400 - $10,000) / 24 months = $641 per month. Ouch... Buying a $10,000 used S-006, getting 18-24 months out of it and then selling it $5-6k works out to ~$150-200 per month. I can work with that.

    Whether the S is better than a D810 or 5Dsr isn't right question IMO. It comes down to what is most enjoyable to use (assuming this is a hobby). I enjoy using a big, bright OVF and I'm willing to pay a hefty premium for one. I'd prefer the S' sensor to be 54x41mm, but the Phase One digital backs come with too many trades offs (e.g. - the DF body, dual batteries, poor battery life in the back, larger, etc.) The S body is more nimble in comparison.

    The latest firmware 2.4.x.x has really transformed the S-006 experience IMO. Auto-focus feels faster and shutter lag is less. The camera feels "peppy" and eager to shoot. I'm not blindly in love with the camera, but it's a nice camera to shoot and with the lens adapters, just about anything can be mounted and used on the S (referencing Mamiya, Contax, Hass and Pentax adapters). The S' OVF is nice, but I think it's speed bump in the auto-focus and reduction in shutter lag that have caught my attention lately.

    When it comes to the S-007, if it delivers all that is promised, I'd love to have one. And when used prices are around 50% off of retail, I'll be the watching the Buy / Sell boards.
    John
    www.pebbleplace.com / Facebook
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •