Site Sponsors
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 52

Thread: My sort of S-007 review..

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    My sort of S-007 review..

    Hi guys,

    Went out and shot with the S-007. Posted some thoughts on it, along with some images:

    Leica S Typ-007 (S-007) | JupiterSnake

    Best,
    Adam
    Thanks 9 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 12 Member(s) liked this post

  2. #2
    Senior Member Malina DZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    S. Florida
    Posts
    549
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    I'm speechless. The shots didn't let me concentrate on your writing. Great color, skin tones and light! Adam, you're doing Leica a huge favor.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    590
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    cruel torture
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by Malina DZ View Post
    I'm speechless. The shots didn't let me concentrate on your writing. Great color, skin tones and light! Adam, you're doing Leica a huge favor.

    Thanks!

    It was a toss up between pictures of my wife, or.. Blurry missed focused shots of random strangers walking towards me. High ISO shots of brick walls. And camera phone footage of me machine gunning the shutter with a large grin on my face
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North Sweden
    Posts
    1,401
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Great shots and review Adam, I hope to have one next week, really looking forward to trying it out.

    I absolutely love my 006 and don't want to sell it so working hard to afford both, I think it's worth the pain for the added performance, I'm a long way North and it's dark for a few months here so it would be nice to have the extra shooting window the ISO offers without the tripod.

    I'm glad to see the richness of the files hasn't been lost with the CMOS, there is just something so beautiful about the bigger pixels and the glass, wonderful! Obviously it helps to have such a stunning subject!

    Enjoy using it.

    Mat
    http://matrichardson.com/
    Workshops for 2018! http://www.matrichardson.com/workshops
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  6. #6
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,928
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by aDam007 View Post
    Hi guys,

    Went out and shot with the S-007. Posted some thoughts on it, along with some images:

    Leica S Typ-007 (S-007) | JupiterSnake

    Best,
    Adam
    Nice article, good photos, Adam!
    Sounds like a terrific camera.

    G
    Godfrey - GDGPhoto Flickr Stream
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Someone on the other forum mentioned that my review doesn't show images of what I'm talking about.. I assumed everyone who was interested in the review would have used the previous model or researched the camera. Here are a few more "typical" reviewer images for those interested.. Nothing fancy, and a few people on getdpi have already done far better ISO tests. And I'm sure someone will do a AF comparison video

    Scenario "Bride walking, I run in front of her turn around and snap." Typically I'd shoot this with an M and nail focus on the first (ok maybe second) attempt and would be done with it.
    But if I were using a DSLR I'd likely either do single shot/center point AF. Or single shot/continuous AF 3D/face detect. Two or three shots would get me the expression I needed and it'd likely be in focus unless it was bad light or severely backlit.
    So in this case I used continuous focus and shot a few frames on single shot. The AF actually didn't catch enough to allow the shutter to fire (unless it just wonkily shot an image of nothing in focus). SOOOO I switched it to MF (back button focus) and thus the shutter fires on press. Basically I press the back button and as soon as it thinks it's locked I press the shutter (usually at that point it looks in focus through the OVF). Seems to be the only way to get the camera to somewhat hit focus on a subject moving towards you. Not ideal, but you would get a few shots in focus, especially if you're shooting at f/4 or above. On f/2 here's what you get when it misses (no point in showing the keepers) due to that split second delay and shallow DOF:

    AF wise it was the back button as that worked the best, obviously this is a shot of when it doesn't work (FF typical web size):


    close crop:



    This next shot is a STRAIGHT OUT OF CAMERA JPG file 3200 ISO. No color corrections or brightening has been made. I do need to add the OOCJPG files are going to be a stop behind what the DNG can currently do, and probably two stops by the time LR profiles are made and firmware is updated (hopefully). It's mixed light, and as I said before in low light (unflattering light, not a keeper, the second shot I took she moved forward slightly and the shadows on the nose went away, but I shot that one at 125th @1600 and she was making silly faces because she wanted to go home). It'll give you an idea of ISO both from a 100% crop and a typical size I am requested to resize images to for non-corporate clients (ppl who wanna share images on FB/IG):

    Full frame (35S @ 2.5 / 250th / 3200ISO):


    Roughly 100% crop from the OOC JPG:



    Taken from DNG no noise reduction or any adjustments, roughly 100% crop:
    Thanks 2 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 4 Member(s) liked this post

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by mjr View Post
    Great shots and review Adam, I hope to have one next week, really looking forward to trying it out.

    I absolutely love my 006 and don't want to sell it so working hard to afford both, I think it's worth the pain for the added performance, I'm a long way North and it's dark for a few months here so it would be nice to have the extra shooting window the ISO offers without the tripod.

    I'm glad to see the richness of the files hasn't been lost with the CMOS, there is just something so beautiful about the bigger pixels and the glass, wonderful! Obviously it helps to have such a stunning subject!

    Enjoy using it.

    Mat

    Yes, I agree. The "magic" is still there. More so than the switch from the M9 to M240. Though again, I love my M240 cameras.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Godfrey View Post
    Nice article, good photos, Adam!
    Sounds like a terrific camera.

    G
    Thanks, seems that way. I think I still like my M-P cameras and M-lenses though
    That 50mm M-Summicron-APO, can't get it out of my head.
    Last edited by aDam007; 29th August 2015 at 04:31. Reason: :D

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by uhoh7 View Post
    cruel torture

    I think we need to meet up to shoot the 100S along side the 75LUX. I'm curious to see if there are any similarities between the two lenses. Since Leica is saying the 100S is the Noctilux of the S-world. And we all know the 75LUX is really a crop-Noctilux (think croptilux will catch on?). And in all fairness the 100S is a 80mm lens (80Lux-75Lux same same).

  10. #10
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Excellent Adam
    lovely photos (lovely wife).
    I must pull myself together and get finished!

    Just this guy you know

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    Excellent Adam
    lovely photos (lovely wife).
    I must pull myself together and get finished!
    I'm sure you have a wider variety of photos than I do. And your reviews are a lot more succinct than mine.. I tend to ramble on
    I look forward to reading the review!
    Last edited by aDam007; 29th August 2015 at 04:30. Reason: :D

  12. #12
    Member Jay Emm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    93
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    8

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Nice work Adam, appreciate the review. Great to see this next iteration of the S series is ticking the boxes.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    2,338
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    52

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Nice review- very useful shots - thanks to your patient wife.
    Interesting thoughts on higher ISO's and colour.

    I'm starting to think this camera might be the upgrade from original S2 I've been waiting for.

    Many thanks
    -Pete
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    398
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Thanks for posting the samples. The files from the S 007 look awesome.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    276
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Thanks Adam!
    Nice preview of the camera and exactly the kind of subject matter I wanted to see photographed.
    Enjoy your new camera.
    Ciao,
    Giorgio Niro
    www.giorgioniro.com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  16. #16
    Senior Member bab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    250
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Adam you have the best review so far on the web nice job. Does any body know why Leica delayed the 007?
    Also I can't believe the reviews I've seen from those lucky enough to obtain one new S (007) for review! One guy even says he doesn't own any Leicas and loves his Pentax and then says Leica is a nice camera but bulky and heavy, wow what a waste. I bet you there are 100 photographers including me that would have appreciated having the new S for two weeks or longer and would of had much more to say even about turning the camera ON, let alone post at least one studio shot with a subject lit with a para, a product shot, a natural light portrait, a sunset, a mountain air shot, a long exposure and or something more than a snapshot of their mailbox. Your killing me Leica!!! It would be a different matter if you had to buy and process film to shoot the S and give a review then I could understand the lack of images but heck digital film is free like air. Despite a pronominal brand and most likely a great line of products who ever is responsible for shipping out equipment for review if there is anyone might just as well not sent any out because those who got one for the most part gave such negative comments.
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Thanks guys!

  18. #18
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Hollywood, FL
    Posts
    580
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by bab View Post
    Adam you have the best review so far on the web nice job. Does any body know why Leica delayed the 007?
    Also I can't believe the reviews I've seen from those lucky enough to obtain one new S (007) for review! One guy even says he doesn't own any Leicas and loves his Pentax and then says Leica is a nice camera but bulky and heavy, wow what a waste. I bet you there are 100 photographers including me that would have appreciated having the new S for two weeks or longer and would of had much more to say even about turning the camera ON, let alone post at least one studio shot with a subject lit with a para, a product shot, a natural light portrait, a sunset, a mountain air shot, a long exposure and or something more than a snapshot of their mailbox. Your killing me Leica!!! It would be a different matter if you had to buy and process film to shoot the S and give a review then I could understand the lack of images but heck digital film is free like air. Despite a pronominal brand and most likely a great line of products who ever is responsible for shipping out equipment for review if there is anyone might just as well not sent any out because those who got one for the most part gave such negative comments.
    I'm currently working on wrapping up my in-depth review on the S007. I took the camera to Iceland for nine days and also did some low-light street photography in NYC and Miami, as well as a tabletop still life for ISO comparisons. Stay tuned.

    Oh, and I didn't baby it....

    David Farkas
    Leica Store Miami
    Likes 5 Member(s) liked this post

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    71
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Adam's review is probably the most useful to date, but I'd like to see a side-by-side comparison of the 007 and 006 with regard to skin tones and rendering. Not to start another sensor debate, but there does seem to be some kind of difference between CMOS and CCD sensors, at least when it comes to skin. Which is maybe why Leica is continuing with the Leica S-E.
    Last edited by Photo Lawyer; 2nd September 2015 at 06:32.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Lawyer View Post
    Adam's review is probably the most useful to date, but I'd like to see a side-by-side comparison of the 007 and 006 with regard to skin tones and rendering. Not to start another sensor debate, but there does seem to be some kind of difference between CMOS and CCD sensors, at least when it comes to skin. Which is maybe why Leica is continuing with the Leica S-E.
    I could probably put up some side by sides.. But I'm telling you the difference is a lot more subtle then with the M240 and M9. And even that was blown out of proportion. However, if I'm shooting at 100 ISO and my pictures are well exposed, it's difficult not to love the S-006 files enough to seriously think twice about using any other camera.

    Out of JPG files, different story. The S-006 still has the advantage there for some reason. Maybe just personal preference?

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North Sweden
    Posts
    1,401
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    I agree Adam, nicely exposed the 006 is an incredibly good camera, I'm hoping to have the 007 next week, I just want it to be as good at base ISO where I shoot 75% of the time and better higher up, I would be very happy! At ISO100 in the right conditions I think the 006 is unbeatable.

    Looking forward to seeing David's review too.

    Have a good evening

    Mat

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by mjr View Post
    I agree Adam, nicely exposed the 006 is an incredibly good camera, I'm hoping to have the 007 next week, I just want it to be as good at base ISO where I shoot 75% of the time and better higher up, I would be very happy! At ISO100 in the right conditions I think the 006 is unbeatable.

    Looking forward to seeing David's review too.

    Have a good evening

    Mat
    Looking at the S-006 and the S-007 ISO 100 DNG files. I'd give the edge to the S-006. But it's ever so slight. Like 1/4 a stop advantage at best in grain structure, and 1/2 stop in color noise. Something I think would probably process out from both files if I did my usual thing and made them both TIFF files for print. But I have to note, the S-006 base ISO has the advantage if you're splitting hairs.

    Unless you're printing REALLY big, and looking close. I think they're both uber capable.
    I haven't had issues at all with A0 prints on my S-006.

  23. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    71
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by aDam007 View Post
    I could probably put up some side by sides.. But I'm telling you the difference is a lot more subtle then with the M240 and M9. And even that was blown out of proportion. However, if I'm shooting at 100 ISO and my pictures are well exposed, it's difficult not to love the S-006 files enough to seriously think twice about using any other camera.

    Out of JPG files, different story. The S-006 still has the advantage there for some reason. Maybe just personal preference?
    Thanks for the comments, Adam (and Mat). I am thinking of upgrading from an S2, and just not sure if I should find a mint 006 or pay extra for the 007. Same sensor and pixel sizes and lenses lend themselves to a unique side-by-side comparison. I'd also be interested in any comments you guys might have about post-processing. The CCD needs little if any. Not having a CMOS camera, I wonder if the 007 requires more PP.

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North Sweden
    Posts
    1,401
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    I'm going to be interested in post processing too, I find it takes me months to get really comfortable with getting the most from my images, I found moving back to LR with the 006 hard after loving C1 with the Nikons and Phase back previously. I would use the 006 in C1 all the time if I could. I am looking forward to seeing what the CMOS does though.

    I am not technical enough or rather don't care enough to understand why I prefer what I get from the 006 over the D800's I had before, extremely capable cameras but in some way just flat tonally when compared to the bigger sensor/ccd in the 006. I haven't used any camera since that gives that 3d visual effect, sort of depth that I don't see in smaller formats. I have read loads of people stating that in all measurable ways there shouldn't be a difference but there is to me and I guess I have the only opinion I care about!

    I would very much like to keep the 006 as a backup to a 007 but I need a return on investment so will have to see, if the 007 is as good for me as Adam's images show then maybe I can be happy with a move back to CMOS. I have all the lenses I need now so it's just a body to produce what I want, exciting times!

    Mat

  25. #25
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Between these examples, those of another photographer who beta tested the camera, and other reviews with images … I placed my order (the new price was a key factor).

    Now I have to muster enough funds to keep my S(006) and use it for back-up while shooting tethered in studio with lighting @ ISO 100 with a second CS lens to avoid lens swaps while shooting.

    Thanks for the input!

    - Marc
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  26. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by mjr View Post
    I'm going to be interested in post processing too, I find it takes me months to get really comfortable with getting the most from my images, I found moving back to LR with the 006 hard after loving C1 with the Nikons and Phase back previously. I would use the 006 in C1 all the time if I could. I am looking forward to seeing what the CMOS does though.

    I am not technical enough or rather don't care enough to understand why I prefer what I get from the 006 over the D800's I had before, extremely capable cameras but in some way just flat tonally when compared to the bigger sensor/ccd in the 006. I haven't used any camera since that gives that 3d visual effect, sort of depth that I don't see in smaller formats. I have read loads of people stating that in all measurable ways there shouldn't be a difference but there is to me and I guess I have the only opinion I care about!

    I would very much like to keep the 006 as a backup to a 007 but I need a return on investment so will have to see, if the 007 is as good for me as Adam's images show then maybe I can be happy with a move back to CMOS. I have all the lenses I need now so it's just a body to produce what I want, exciting times!

    Mat
    All cameras are like that. I couldn't tell you if it was "easier" for me to see the colors in the S-007 as a positive thing because I was using the M240 for so long. OR if they're much closer to the S-006 files from the get go.

    I suspect it's a bit of both. But more leaning towards the second thought. With an added third. Which is it's hard to dislike the S-lenses

    With processing in mind, I think it's probably familiar because I've been using the S-006 and the M240 in tandem a lot. With more of an emphasis on the M240. So maybe it's that I'm just use to processing two types of files to look like one.

    I said in the review, I see a bit of that yellow/green bias to the S-007, that I've seen in the M240. Though much less so. AND I also see the greens in the shadows on higher ISO settings and when you push a file more then 2 stops in LR.

    I don't think you'll dislike the S-007 files. But it's always good to have a backup when using Leica gear. Especially if you work with it enough.


    I don't think I could afford two S-007 cameras. But I was toying with the idea of getting two S-006 cameras at one point, after seeing the price drop. So who knows what kind of kit I end up with in the end.

  27. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Totally forgot to mention the DOF scale/calculator.

    When you're using the camera it does that Batis thing.. But since the screen has more space, it gives you the readout in a easier to see/use way. I wouldn't use the feature often, but it's nice for group shots, and I don't think anyone has mentioned it yet.


    Marc - I could see this being useful for you. Would probably help you decide in a split second if you could sacrifice some DOF for bokeh or not within each individual group shot.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by fotografz View Post
    Between these examples, those of another photographer who beta tested the camera, and other reviews with images … I placed my order (the new price was a key factor).

    Now I have to muster enough funds to keep my S(006) and use it for back-up while shooting tethered in studio with lighting @ ISO 100 with a second CS lens to avoid lens swaps while shooting.

    Thanks for the input!

    - Marc
    See above.

  28. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,310
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by dfarkas View Post
    I'm currently working on wrapping up my in-depth review on the S007. I took the camera to Iceland for nine days and also did some low-light street photography in NYC and Miami, as well as a tabletop still life for ISO comparisons. Stay tuned.
    I can't believe you came to Iceland and didn't even come visit the studio!! I would have happily shown you around, and would have loved to see the 007...
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook

  29. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by aDam007 View Post
    Totally forgot to mention the DOF scale/calculator.
    Yes, it's nice to have, one minor remark though about the distance read-out on the top-display, I think the order should be reversed so that it reads back/focus/front instead of front/focus/back. To me, this seems much more logical from the POV of the camera operator. Maybe Leica can make the order of appearance a menu option.

  30. #30
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Hollywood, FL
    Posts
    580
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart Richardson View Post
    I can't believe you came to Iceland and didn't even come visit the studio!! I would have happily shown you around, and would have loved to see the 007...
    Stuart, believe me, I thought about giving you a ring. Going it alone was tough at times.

    Unfortunately, at the time, I wasn't permitted to tell anyone I had the camera. Iceland was such an incredible place, though. I'm sure I'll be back in the not-to-distant future and we can get together then!
    David Farkas
    Leica Store Miami
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  31. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,310
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Please just send me a free 007 and all will be forgiven.
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook

  32. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    From the review:

    Odd Quirks – Leica’s constant reinvention of the wheel. In this case literally the shutter wheel… It doesn’t have numbers on it. The wheel will spin and spin and digitally the shutter will change. A quick look at the shutter dial will tell you nothing. No more shutter by feel. And Germany’s reason, now you use the shutter dial to zoom in and out of your images. Genius right? No, it was fine before.

    Hi Adam, thanks for the review. I'm reading it for the second time now.

    Just wanted to say I would not be bothered by the missing numbers on the shutter wheel. I like the much cleaner design. And besides, I know what settings I'm in when I switch on the camera, and I can count clicks while looking through the viewfinder.

    Thanks to your wife for the kind modelling work. Great rendering of your 100mm.

  33. #33
    Subscriber and Workshop Member MGrayson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,575
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Jono,

    I saw your review on l-camera-forum... will it appear here?

    Excellent pictures!

    Best,

    Matt

  34. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    I've taken a quick look through the LUF link, great, great photos Jono.

  35. #35
    New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by dfarkas View Post
    I'm currently working on wrapping up my in-depth review on the S007. I took the camera to Iceland for nine days and also did some low-light street photography in NYC and Miami, as well as a tabletop still life for ISO comparisons. Stay tuned.

    Oh, and I didn't baby it....


    David, how long will it take to wrap up your in-depth review of the S007?

    Now that Jono has published, it's just you we are waiting on.

    Yeah, I know you are having a difficult time editing down the 2,000 shots you want to publish...

    Jack

  36. #36
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Hollywood, FL
    Posts
    580
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by JMacD View Post
    David, how long will it take to wrap up your in-depth review of the S007?

    Now that Jono has published, it's just you we are waiting on.

    Yeah, I know you are having a difficult time editing down the 2,000 shots you want to publish...

    Jack
    Today!
    David Farkas
    Leica Store Miami

  37. #37
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Hollywood, FL
    Posts
    580
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    David Farkas
    Leica Store Miami
    Thanks 3 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  38. #38
    New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Wow what a trip.
    Thanks for your comprhensive report.
    The DOF feature is very cool on the 007
    Jack




    Quote Originally Posted by dfarkas View Post

  39. #39
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Hollywood, FL
    Posts
    580
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by dfarkas View Post
    It was brought to my attention on other forums that many were seeing overly saturated images in my review and field report. Turns out my web publishing software had been updated to use a resizing software library that was dropping the ICC profile for the resized inline images in the article. This didn't affect my full size images brought up when clicking on the inline ones, but seems most people never clicked for larger views. This was especially problematic on high gamut monitors. I pulled up the review on an NEC SpectraView at work and some of the colors were downright nuclear.

    I changed over to a different graphics engine on my website and regenerated all of the medium images. They now have the correct ICC profile embedded. If you felt upon first viewing that the images were wonky due to camera color or LR profiles, please have another look.

    Thanks!
    David Farkas
    Leica Store Miami
    Thanks 2 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  40. #40
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    3
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    I'm considering to buy a used S2. Can someone tell me if the sensor in the S2 and the S type 006 is the same. I've been researching the answer to my question for some time now but couldn't find it...

  41. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,310
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by Bundestrainer View Post
    I'm considering to buy a used S2. Can someone tell me if the sensor in the S2 and the S type 006 is the same. I've been researching the answer to my question for some time now but couldn't find it...
    Yes, it is the same sensor with slightly different tuning. The S2 is from 160 to 1250 ISO, and the S006 is from 100 to 1600. Having had both, I did not really notice any differences in sensor performance or character. The 006 has a different interface, better screen, gps and faster performance. But in terms of sheer image quality, the S2 is its equal. Others have reported the 006 having better ISO performance, but I did not really notice this in my own copies. I mostly shoot at base ISO, however.
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  42. #42
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    3
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart Richardson View Post
    Yes, it is the same sensor with slightly different tuning. The S2 is from 160 to 1250 ISO, and the S006 is from 100 to 1600. Having had both, I did not really notice any differences in sensor performance or character. The 006 has a different interface, better screen, gps and faster performance. But in terms of sheer image quality, the S2 is its equal. Others have reported the 006 having better ISO performance, but I did not really notice this in my own copies. I mostly shoot at base ISO, however.
    Thank you so much, that really helps. Just need to check my bank account.

  43. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    804
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by Bundestrainer View Post
    I'm considering to buy a used S2. Can someone tell me if the sensor in the S2 and the S type 006 is the same. I've been researching the answer to my question for some time now but couldn't find it...
    Search for special offers for a new S006 & 70mm Summarit. They can be had at prices close to a used S2. I bought this combo from red dot cameras in the UK at a very attractive price.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  44. #44
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    3
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by retow View Post
    Search for special offers for a new S006 & 70mm Summarit. They can be had at prices close to a used S2. I bought this combo from red dot cameras in the UK at a very attractive price.
    Why would you prefer the S006 to the S2? And maybe you could send me a personal message to inform me about the amount you paid for the body and lens.

  45. #45
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    107
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by retow View Post
    Search for special offers for a new S006 & 70mm Summarit. They can be had at prices close to a used S2. I bought this combo from red dot cameras in the UK at a very attractive price.
    I've been looking for a deal like that myself.

  46. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    804
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by magosak View Post
    I've been looking for a deal like that myself.
    Have a look at red dot cameras UK.

  47. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    804
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by Bundestrainer View Post
    Why would you prefer the S006 to the S2? And maybe you could send me a personal message to inform me about the amount you paid for the body and lens.
    The differences between the S2 and the (006) are: improved AF system, 100 ISO base sensitivity (160 for the S2), control stick, integral GPS and more. Whether any of the changes is worthwhile is for you to decide.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  48. #48
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Hollywood, FL
    Posts
    580
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    For a full rundown of the differences between the S2 and the S006:

    Photokina 2012: Day 2 - The Leica S (Part 1)
    David Farkas
    Leica Store Miami
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  49. #49
    Member elitegroup's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    25
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Quote Originally Posted by dfarkas View Post
    For a full rundown of the differences between the S2 and the S006:

    Photokina 2012: Day 2 - The Leica S (Part 1)
    Hi David, does the Leica S-007 USB 3.0 tethering function work yet? If yes how long from capture to preview using Leica image shuttle v.3 and opening in a watch folder in LR.

    Also how long for a preview from capture to an iPad 2secs, 3secs?

    Thanks for any info!
    MANA WAIRUA

  50. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North Sweden
    Posts
    1,401
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: My sort of S-007 review..

    Hi elitegroup

    Not sure if you use Image Shuttle and a watched folder as a preference but I tether with the 007 a lot and it tethers direct to LR without the need for IS and watched folders. Opening a tether session with the 007 it recognises the camera straight away and works exactly as my Nikons did, it's quick, a second or two and the frame is up, works really well. Te supplied cable is great, long enough for me and very secure in the camera, overall it's a great way to work.

    Hope this helps.

    Mat

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •