Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
By the way the 35 Summarit isnt a bad lens either.Guys, thanks a lot for your experience with this lens.
Do agree that the M8 put a different slant on the lenses.
I did look through flickr. But I value your experiences more.
Thank you.
Interesting comment, mainly given it possibly ties in with my previous comment that the 35mm Summi ASPH can be a bit "harsh" on the M240, and I am speculating (only mid-roll with an M7 and Adox 20 as the first test) that the high acuity ("bite"?) that this lens achieves will combine to work really well with the softer rendering of film compared to digital sensor.I only really shoot film at the moment and it is on that medium that I think this lens especially shines.
It might be partly that, Jon. For me I think it is also that I don't think the digital sensors cope so well with the oblique angles of light from this lens, especially around the edges of the frame. On film, the lens seems to have a more natural and consistent sharpness across the frame and the optical character (with IMO a surprisingly apparent narrow depth of field for a given aperture at this focal length) shines through. The lens also seems to have a pronounced curvature of field which, I think, is masked to an extent, by the intrinsic thickness and irregularity of film compared with the zero depth and uncompromising flatness of a digital sensor. I also feel the same way about the 28 Summicron, a more recent design but still one firmly from the film era. That lens also vignettes quite badly on digital (in spite of the 6-bit in-camera corrections for vignetting), something it doesn't do on film emulsion. (I would probably have sold my 28 Summicron by now if I hadn't largely switched to film and discovered the true qualities of this lens.)Interesting comment, mainly given it possibly ties in with my previous comment that the 35mm Summi ASPH can be a bit "harsh" on the M240, and I am speculating (only mid-roll with an M7 and Adox 20 as the first test) that the high acuity ("bite"?) that this lens achieves will combine to work really well with the softer rendering of film compared to digital sensor.
Is that also what you're saying, or have you found other attributes of the 35mm Sumi + film combo?