I suppose I better chip in here!
Hi Vincent - thank you so much for a perfect deal (from my point of view anyway). Quick and painless!
Steve - I enjoyed your 'review' and especially the fine photos.
The reason I changed, was that I had too many mid-wides, and I was dithering which to use. The 28 'cron has the big reputation, so I bought it and sold the others.
What do I feel? Well, the lens hood is so huge and ludicrous that I'm not going to use it - I'm searching around for a decent small lens hood in the UK, and in the meantime I'll put up with (not much) flare.
As far as sharpness is concerned, let's get it straight - the little elmarit is every bit as sharp it's bigger brother, I'm not sure that it's sharper, but I'm certain it's AS sharp.
If the 28 'cron has 'magic', then it's to do with a slightly less brutal approach, perhaps it has a little less microcontrast? I'm always very wary about the 'drawing' discussions about lenses, but if you nail my feet to the floor I guess that I'd say that the 28 draws more gently, has a slightly more 3D feel, and slightly better bokeh.
On the other hand, if you started talking about 'the emperor's new clothes' and told me I was speaking bollocks . . . I'd only be fairly sure you were wrong!
Basically, I like the 28 'cron (apart from the lens hood), I thought it was going to make my lens decisions easier . . . but I still have (and love) the humble Zeiss 25 f2.8.
However, like the 28 'cron though I may, it's certainly no revelation, and if I wasn't in the position to have simply 'reorganised' my existing investment, I would not have thought the extra price was worth it.