Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Mamiya M645 110mm/2.8: N vs. prior to N?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    724
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Mamiya M645 110mm/2.8: N vs. prior to N?

    I am looking at Mamiya M645 110mm/2.8 lens. Are there any differences in optical formulas / results between most recent ones (N) and those prior to it?

    Thank you in advance!

  2. #2
    Senior Subscriber Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,306
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mamiya M645 110mm/2.8: N vs. prior to N?

    Isn't this an RZ lens?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    724
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Mamiya M645 110mm/2.8: N vs. prior to N?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jan Brittenson View Post
    Isn't this an RZ lens?
    I wouldn't know.

  4. #4
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    carstenw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    2,530
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mamiya M645 110mm/2.8: N vs. prior to N?

    There does appear to be some Mamiya 645 110mm f/2.8 lenses being sold on eBay:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/Mamiya-Sekor-C-1...#ht_500wt_1083

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/mamiya-110mm-l...#ht_500wt_1083

    I suppose they could be wrongly labelled, but they do look more like 645 than 67 lenses.
    Carsten - Website

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    N.S. Canada
    Posts
    2,010
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mamiya M645 110mm/2.8: N vs. prior to N?

    There is a 110/2.8 for 645, as Carsten found, it's just not commonly known. It's reportedly quite nice.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Gatos, CA
    Posts
    340
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mamiya M645 110mm/2.8: N vs. prior to N?

    Yes, I got the 110/2.8 C for just that reason...to allow a comparison between the 645 and RZ when shooting digital back. I didn't see much quantifiable difference (within the cropped region) in IQ, but there did to be some visible difference in distortion. I couldn't tell which was more correct, however.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •