Site Sponsors
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 55

Thread: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    431
    Post Thanks / Like

    anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    this is seeming more and more like vaporware - has anyone got a sighting of one in the wild as yet?

  2. #2
    Senior Member kdphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Carmel/Tucson
    Posts
    2,355
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Still waiting patiently. I don't think the announced LS lenses from Schneider are in the same class of vaporware as the 45-90 or 45mm T/S....... I'm much more confident the 80mm LS will soon have company with the 55mm LS and 110mm LS.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    431
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    I suspect Phase have been a little overwhelmed by taking on Mamiya. and Leaf. and releasing C1 5.0.

    they seem to be slipping way behind with delivery of many items, I can only hope a serious restructuring is underway, and that a raft of new products will come out at Photokina.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    431
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    bump - in the hope that someone has some news?!

  5. #5
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    I got the 80 and just had a chance to play with it a bit -- and I'm really liking the look it produces. Unfortunately it means I'll want the 110 and 55 as well... Here's one from yesterday, wide open:



    I realized I should have included a 100% crop from the f2.8 focus plane for reference. Here is an unsharpened 800 pixel crop from a different image of the same door where I focused on the door of the old structure:

    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  6. #6
    Subscriber Member tashley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    South of England
    Posts
    3,295
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    I have the 110 on order and have been told that the first ones will ship as soon as late this month but in limited numbers.

  7. #7
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by narikin View Post
    I suspect Phase have been a little overwhelmed by taking on Mamiya. and Leaf. and releasing C1 5.0.

    they seem to be slipping way behind with delivery of many items, I can only hope a serious restructuring is underway, and that a raft of new products will come out at Photokina.
    Heard some twitting going on from the birdies out there this is going to be a good year but no details. I know I know show me the money and I agree but at least something sounded positive and i believe we will see some stuff. I personally think Phase is on the move but it has taken some time to get all the gears in working order with Mamiya and there investment into it. I did the corporate thing for 16 years and things move at a snails pace sometimes. Let's hope sooner than later.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  8. #8
    Senior Member kdphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Carmel/Tucson
    Posts
    2,355
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    I'm excited about the Schneider 110mm LS---and also heard (and checked) that a 35mm D series is in the works.

    Which one are you getting first, Guy?


  9. #9
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    I want the 110mm but I want a 200mm AF D 2.8 with it, than I can sell my 150mm. Obviously the 200 is a dream lens but if Phase is listening this would be the next one to make. Does not have to be a LS lens either. After that folks I just can't see any better than the 28D, 45D and 150 D so those lenses they can ignore and work on the gaps 35mm, New 55 LS coming , 110mm LS coming, 80mm LS here so the gaps i see are 35, 200, 35-90 zoom or that range , T/S lens. Obviously love to see a 21mm F5.6 rectilinear in a small package for interior work and such.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  10. #10
    Senior Member yaya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,168
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    38

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by kdphotography View Post
    I'm excited about the Schneider 110mm LS---and also heard (and checked) that a 35mm D series is in the works.

    Which one are you getting first, Guy?

    Had a chance to try a prototype 110mm a couple of months ago. It is very pretty and is definitely worth the waiting IMO

    Yair
    Yair Shahar | Product Manager | Phase One | Mamiya Leaf
    e: [email protected] | m: +44(0)77 8992 8199 | yaya's blog

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    431
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by tashley View Post
    I have the 110 on order and have been told that the first ones will ship as soon as late this month but in limited numbers.
    yeah... I have one "on order" too, and have been told various expected dates that are repeatedly not met. It sure had better be worth it!

    a certain dealer here in NYC wanted me to sign a purchase contract (with cancellation fees) to get in line for one! Its a lens for goodness sake - since when do you sign an order contract with a page of legal terms, to get in line for a lens?

    I walked away.

  12. #12
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Don't blame you and I would have done the same.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Hong Kong / Asia
    Posts
    524
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    I want the 110mm but I want a 200mm AF D 2.8 with it, than I can sell my 150mm. Obviously the 200 is a dream lens but if Phase is listening this would be the next one to make. Does not have to be a LS lens either. After that folks I just can't see any better than the 28D, 45D and 150 D so those lenses they can ignore and work on the gaps 35mm, New 55 LS coming , 110mm LS coming, 80mm LS here so the gaps i see are 35, 200, 35-90 zoom or that range , T/S lens. Obviously love to see a 21mm F5.6 rectilinear in a small package for interior work and such.
    Guy,

    You are leaving out the 80 1.9 AF "D". With what new prices was for that MF lens, one can speculate in how much they will do their mark up? Is it a smell of lots of profits for lenses they make into AF "D"???

    I know folks are listening at Phase One and Leaf...

    Yaya, is there any way you please could raise my suggestion for them to try to keep prices more reasonable compared to what older lenses originally was? That obvious go for the 200 2.8 as well... Very much kind thanks!

    Regards
    Anders

  14. #14
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Yea a AF D 80 1.9 focal only would be awesome
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  15. #15
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Maybe Kevin and Yaya can pass these on to the powers that be on this. I would kill for the 200 2.8 AF D version
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  16. #16
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    All I can say is if the 110 and 55 are as good as this 80 of mine, I'm already in for both!

    My problem is that I have the 75-150 D zoom which is excellent and covers the 110, as well as the 120 D Macro which is excellent and close to 110 -- of course the latter is manual focus and neither is LS. Next is the 55 is also close to the 45 D I have, also excellent. So do I really need LS in those two focals given costs and budgets? Honestly I can do about 80% of everything I shoot with the 45, 80 and 120 I already own...
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  17. #17
    KWR Phase One
    Guest

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Hi...I know you are waiting on the new 55mm and 110mm LS lenses and you seem to as impatient as I am. I am one of the people that get the emails and calls on these so Iíll let you know what I know. The 110mm LS lens should be shipping by May 7th. And, the 55mm LS lens around May 22nd.

    I am sure the wait will be worthwhile. I have shot with both and I know our engineers have been working hard to make sure the lenses are of the highest quality. These are beautiful pieces of glass and you wonít be disappointed.

    When we start shipping we ship to dealers first for their demo orders then ship in the order we have received orders. Also, as the weeks go by the production volume will also increase and these will be moving fast. Iíll let you know the day we have confirmed shipping.

    Truly sorry for the delays, but we some committed people in DK making sure the delivered product is the best it can be.

  18. #18
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Thanks Kevin for the report that is very good news to us end users. Please consider sending my above request for a 200mm 2.8 AF D. i think that one would certainly go over well with end users and you can put me down for the first one. LOL

    As well as others. I know many requests come in for new gear but it something to toss around and see what folks think. Again I think it is very important to have Phase representation here as well as Hassy, Leaf, Leica and so on and this forum does encourage very highly that participation.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  19. #19
    Senior Member kdphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Carmel/Tucson
    Posts
    2,355
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    ....My problem is that I have the 75-150 D zoom which is excellent and covers the 110, as well as the 120 D Macro which is excellent and close to 110 -- of course the latter is manual focus and neither is LS. Next is the 55 is also close to the 45 D I have, also excellent. So do I really need LS in those two focals given costs and budgets? Honestly I can do about 80% of everything I shoot with the 45, 80 and 120 I already own...
    You know, Jack, in talking with you---this is exactly the same type of rationalization I tried to use myself before I bought the Mamiya 150mm D.

    You poo-poo'd that. And you were the one who convinced me to buy one more lens...

    So I'm here to tell you that you need to add both the 110mm LS and 55mm LS to your 80mm LS. You wouldn't want to break up a set would you?

  20. #20
    Senior Member vieri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Ginesio, Italy
    Posts
    984
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Thanks Kevin for the report that is very good news to us end users. Please consider sending my above request for a 200mm 2.8 AF D. i think that one would certainly go over well with end users and you can put me down for the first one. LOL

    ...
    +1, I would get the second one after Guy's in a heartbeat
    Vieri Bottazzini
    Leica Ambassador | Formatt-Hitech Ambassador | ABIPP EP
    VIERI BOTTAZZINI PHOTOGRAPHER | VIERI BOTTAZZINI WORKSHOPS | VIERI BOTTAZZINI FINE ART

  21. #21
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by kdphotography View Post
    You know, Jack, in talking with you---this is exactly the same type of rationalization I tried to use myself before I bought the Mamiya 150mm D.

    You poo-poo'd that. And you were the one who convinced me to buy one more lens...

    So I'm here to tell you that you need to add both the 110mm LS and 55mm LS to your 80mm LS. You wouldn't want to break up a set would you?
    I stand by my reco for you and the 150 D -- actually for ANYBODY who shoots people and or events regularly, that 150 D is simply amazing...
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  22. #22
    Senior Member kdphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Carmel/Tucson
    Posts
    2,355
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    I stand by my reco for you and the 150 D -- actually for ANYBODY who shoots people and or events regularly, that 150 D is simply amazing...
    Jack, your recommendations have always been pretty much "spot-on" ---but then again, that assessment may be slightly biased, as all gear sluts think pretty much alike...

  23. #23
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Bill Caulfeild-Browne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bruce Peninsula, Canada
    Posts
    2,535
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    184

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    I stand by my reco for you and the 150 D -- actually for ANYBODY who shoots people and or events regularly, that 150 D is simply amazing...
    +1!
    Bill

  24. #24
    SCHWARZZEIT
    Guest

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    I realized I should have included a 100% crop from the f2.8 focus plane for reference. Here is an unsharpened 800 pixel crop from a different image of the same door where I focused on the door of the old structure:

    Jack, are you sure this is unsharpened, not even to some degree during raw conversion?

    On screen it looks to me like there was some degree of sharpening applied. The micro contrast really pops out.

    I can see some random white and black single pixel artifacts in the crop. I don't think they would show in any form on a print but it looks distracting on screen. Are those artifacts coming from the raw conversion?

    -Dominique

  25. #25
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    It was capture sharpened at my normal setting in C1 only --- 160%/0.6/2.0... This in and of itself creates no artifacts, so anything you're seeing there is the result of jpegging (I jpeged this at 10 in CS). The increased micro-contrast is actually fairly obvious when you compare this lens directly to the 80 D and one of the reasons I decided to keep this over the D.

    Here is the same crop processed for max detail. Note that in the wood "sign" above the door, you can see some minor artifacting -- this again is only visible in the jpeg, not in the tiff. This lens is "cut your eyeballs" sharp -- again, this is wide open at f2.8:



    And for further reference, here is the full frame -- as you can see, it's unlikely even the artifacts above would show in a print:

    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  26. #26
    Senior Member faneuil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    570
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Got my 110!

    well.. a manual focus Sekor C lens for $104!
    First impressions are, well, impressive!
    What is expected price of the new 110mm lens?
    Always love MF portraits in the 110-120mm range.
    The new 150mm 2.8 is mightily impressive but may not be my cup of tea.

    Eric

  27. #27
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by faneuil View Post
    Got my 110!

    well.. a manual focus Sekor C lens for $104!
    First impressions are, well, impressive!
    What is expected price of the new 110mm lens?
    Always love MF portraits in the 110-120mm range.
    The new 150mm 2.8 is mightily impressive but may not be my cup of tea.

    Eric
    We want PICTURES!!!

    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  28. #28
    Member RGoldman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    202
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    We want PICTURES!!!


    YES! I would love to see some from that lens. It's on my want list at the moment along with the 150mm f/2.8.

  29. #29
    SCHWARZZEIT
    Guest

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Thanks for the demonstration, Jack. The version that you processed for detail is obviously much sharper than the other crop that had only the pre-sharpening applied. But now there are many single black and white pixels that pop out like sparkle. AFAIK jpeg compression may introduce blocking and banding artifacts. I haven't seen something like this from jpeg compression. But if those sparkling pixels do not appear in the tif then there's no other explanation.
    Just to make sure we talk about the same thing here, the odd pixels I'm referring to are also obvious in one of the crops from your WR S + Rodenstock 40mm review where almost every bolt of the train has one white pixel on top and even more so in the bush background:



    It looks like the sharpening software is creating some artificial highlights to increase the micro-contrast in certain areas. This may be quite effective to increase the sharpness impression in a print but it looks artificial to me on the monitor. But then of course the appearance of sharpness itself is a matter of personal taste.

    Sorry for going a little OT with this.

    The 80mm LS is indeed impressively sharp, especially considering that this is f/2.8.
    How is the corner performance wide open?
    Does is it get noticeably better in the center when stopping down?

    -Dominique

  30. #30
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Good points Dominique,

    I think we tend to process for our normal output medium, and mine is print. So many of my jpegs will appear over-sharpened at 100% screen resolution. The sparklies are one characteristic for sure. I think my issue with the train shot was I applied my normal workflow to the raws, and that 40HR is so freaking sharp that it ends up over-done for 100% web, and probably for print too. Chalk it up to learning curve with a piece of equipment I had access to for 48 hours only. On the other hand, the train car was freshly waxed and those rivets are lit by direct sun, as are the waxy leaves on the bush in the background, so at least some of those are likely to be true speculars...

    Back to the 80LS.

    Edge sharpness is very good wide open, but it is not anything close to what the center is. I'll try and post a comparable crop from that above frame if there is something near the corners near the focus plane. If not, I'll find another f2.8 and post the corners. The extreme corners go soft on my P65+ at f2.8.

    Honestly, I think it's already resolving better than the sensor at the center wide open, so stopping down doesn't add much there other than DoF. However, contrast pops up a little and that can add the appearance of being sharper. Again, I can try to post some crops if I can find some that are relevant.
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  31. #31
    SCHWARZZEIT
    Guest

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Ok, knowing that the crops were processed for printing explains the slightly oversharpened appearance on screen.
    In my own workflow with drum scanned film I do not apply any sharpening to the master file. Every image gets individually sharpened after resizing according to the output medium. It also depends on the film type, magnification ratio, contrast range (all those variables that affect the grain pattern of the final image) and of course the content of the image itself. Some images can take more sharpening while others may not need any sharpening at all. There's no batch processing routine, except maybe for very small size web output.

    With that kind of contrast as shown in your crop there's no doubt that the 80 LS easily outresolves the sensor wide open in the center. It's more important how much contrast is transferred within the range of the sensor. That's what you need to resolve very low contrast detail.

    An f/2.8 crop from the edge of the frame would be interesting if there's anything in focus. I think the corner performance of a lens, especially at wider apertures, is where the quality of a lens design really shows aside from the price tag ;-)

    Do you think the overall performance is on par with the Digaron-S and Digitar lenses of comparable focal lengths?

    -Dominique

  32. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    446
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    Good points Dominique,
    Honestly, I think it's already resolving better than the sensor at the center wide open, so stopping down doesn't add much there other than DoF. However, contrast pops up a little and that can add the appearance of being sharper. Again, I can try to post some crops if I can find some that are relevant.
    Jack, this is somewhat OT but interesting. How does a lens resolve better than a sensor? I often see this comment with respect to photographic lenses. The MTF of the system is the product of the MTFs of the discrete components, so better performance in any one component will yield better performance from the system.

    That is, it will until we reach some actual limiting factor such as diffraction. What is going on in this case?

  33. #33
    SCHWARZZEIT
    Guest

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by cunim View Post
    Jack, this is somewhat OT but interesting. How does a lens resolve better than a sensor? I often see this comment with respect to photographic lenses. The MTF of the system is the product of the MTFs of the discrete components, so better performance in any one component will yield better performance from the system.

    That is, it will until we reach some actual limiting factor such as diffraction. What is going on in this case?
    In theory diffraction is the only limiting factor when it comes to the resolving power of a lens. But as there is no such thing as a perfect lens, a lens designer has to deal with all sorts of aberrations, keeping them in check because each aberration reduces contrast. As you figured with the cascading of the MTFs of every link in the imaging chain, in the end contrast is all that really matters because you need some minimum threshold contrast to resolve fine detail. Stopping down decreases the effects of the residual aberrations and thus increases contrast until diffraction drops your contrast even more.

    The resolving power of a sensor is ultimately limited by the Nyquist frequency which is determined by the sensor's pixel pitch. A 6 micron sensor for instance cannot resolve more than 83 lp/mm. So a lens that resolves more than that at decent contrast outresolves the sensor. It means that you could resolve finer detail with a sensor of higher pixel density or with film but that's another topic.

    -Dominique

  34. #34
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by SCHWARZZEIT View Post
    In my own workflow with drum scanned film I do not apply any sharpening to the master file.
    Mine too, but when I processed the above crop, I was actually posting from the field and had cooked the files on my laptop using my 'standard' set of settings --- IOW it was not an optimally processed crop.

    Do you think the overall performance is on par with the Digaron-S and Digitar lenses of comparable focal lengths?
    I think the Digiron HR's and latest Schneider's are still a notch or maybe half a step above this. But this and the latest D lenses from Mamiya and Phase are really pushing that distinction. While the differences are there, you need side-by-side pixel-level comparisons to see them, and thus they won't be realized differences until one prints very large. Factor in the use/convenience advantage and IMHO the scales tip back.
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  35. #35
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Here is another frame from the 80 LS at f2.8 that I had some corner detail at least near the PoF. This is not a perfect example as the camera is angled downward slightly, we do not have a planar subject but rather a series of "stuff" in and out of the focus plane in these regions. But I think it will hopefully give some insight to your main question on corner performance as well as some insights to Bokeh. These are not process sharpened, only the basic capture sharpening as per the earlier image.

    Here is the full image:



    Now Upper Left corner, Lower Left corner and Bottom Center crops:







    Bottom line is I think this is pretty commendable wide-open corner performance from any lens in front of a P65+ sensor. The more I use this lens, the more I like it.
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  36. #36
    SCHWARZZEIT
    Guest

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Thanks for showing these, Jack. I find that subtle glow near the edge really beautiful.
    BTW, I like how the different greens are rendered in this image.

    -Dominique

  37. #37
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by SCHWARZZEIT View Post
    Thanks for showing these, Jack. I find that subtle glow near the edge really beautiful.
    BTW, I like how the different greens are rendered in this image.

    -Dominique
    Yes, I like that soft glow too -- it is oddly pleasing, especially at the corners. Also, it seems to work in harmony with the somewhat busy, but soft far-focus bokeh.

    The green tonal rendition is a property of the Dalsa sensor I really appreciate. FWIW, I processed this image at neutral WB, and the greens pop even more if you warm the WB up a few points (which I normally do for landscape type images). I don't have any logical explanation as to why the response in greens is different from the Kodak sensors, since I would assume it's profile-dependent. But whatever the reason, it is there and I like it too

    Jeeze, I'm starting to sound like the cameraholic version of a wine snob
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  38. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    446
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by SCHWARZZEIT View Post

    The resolving power of a sensor is ultimately limited by the Nyquist frequency which is determined by the sensor's pixel pitch. A 6 micron sensor for instance cannot resolve more than 83 lp/mm. So a lens that resolves more than that at decent contrast outresolves the sensor. It means that you could resolve finer detail with a sensor of higher pixel density or with film but that's another topic.

    -Dominique
    I think I understand. If I might paraphrase - in this mixed digital/analog system, detector aliasing is our ultimate limit. To use the detector at its theoretical limit, we need to ensure lens resolution is better than pixel pitch. I think it would need to be much better than twice as high (e.g. 90% mtf at 83 lp), as the lens should be giving us good contrast at the twice the Nyquist limit of the detector.

    However, this is a special case in that we are not usually imaging Nyquist-limited data. At any spatial frequency above the Nyquist limit a lens does not outresolve the sensor and the multiplicative MTF relationship maintains.

    Interesting and instructive as to why the new digital lenses perform so well on any sensor pitch. Except under a very limited set of conditions a lens cannot ouresolve a sensor. Or have I missed something?

  39. #39
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by cunim View Post
    Except under a very limited set of conditions a lens cannot ouresolve a sensor. Or have I missed something?
    A lens can outresolve a sensor. If you have a sensor that has 200 pixels per linear mm, then before Nyquist it can theoretically "resolve" 100 line-pairs per mm. If your lens now can resolve 120 LPmm, then it "outresolves" the sensor. Nyquist takes the actual resolving ability down to about 67% theoretical, or in this case, 67 LPmm. So all we'd really need in this example is a lens capable of resolving anything better than 67 LPmm and it will be outresolving the sensor.

    What is true, is that we won't be able to tell how much better the lens is if we continue to test with that sensor. All we can know is the lens is at least as good as the sensor, or better, but not how much better. OTOH, if the image in the above example only resolves 40 LPmm, then we know the lens is the limiting factor since our sensor can resolve up to 67.

    Finally, we do not need a sensor or film to determine a lens' resolving power -- we can alternatively derive it by testing it on an optical bench where we view the projected (aerial) image of the test target through a loupe. Extreme optics are tested this way since some can resolve well beyond what even the finest grain film can render.

    Make better sense now?
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  40. #40
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Actually Phase is trying to get me one for testing now. So hopefully soon i can run it through the mill and report fully on it.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  41. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    446
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    A lens can outresolve a sensor. If you have a sensor that has 200 pixels per linear mm, then before Nyquist it can theoretically "resolve" 100 line-pairs per mm. If your lens now can resolve 120 LPmm, then it "outresolves" the sensor. Nyquist takes the actual resolving ability down to about 67% theoretical, or in this case, 67 LPmm. So all we'd really need in this example is a lens capable of resolving anything better than 67 LPmm and it will be outresolving the sensor.

    Make better sense now?
    Thanks, Jack. I was unclear as to how photographers use the term "outresolve". This thread has helped me to understand. Sorry to raise geekoid material in what started as a practical discussion of a specific lens.

    One day, over a beer......

  42. #42
    Subscriber Member KurtKamka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,232
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    26

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Jack, that last image you posted is gorgeous. You covered both points that I find most interesting about the image. 1) The lens has some serious mojo ... even in jpg form. Sharpness as well as a bit of dreaminess at the same time. I am also struck by the clarity that I see in the image. 2) I've taken a break from medium format for the past 6 months, but am intrigued by the color of the greens you are getting with the Dalsa sensor. I never quite warmed to the greens I was getting with the P45+ back (too yellow for my taste) ... but this looks very nice.

    Damn, why did I need to click on the medium format link?

    Kurt

  43. #43
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Hi Kurt:

    I understand your dilemma for sure. I love the look of MF over DSLR, and it's not just about having more pixels or better detail, but more about smoother tonality and the color. I preferred the convenience of my Canons for sure, but at the end of the day the files simply didn't wow me. With MF by comparison, I am regularly wow'd... And there is definitely something to the Dalsa greens, but I cannot explain it.
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  44. #44
    Subscriber Member KurtKamka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,232
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    26

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Sorry to move this thread off-topic, Jack, but how do you like the newer Phase DF body? I loved the smoother tones, color and extra detail (from big files) I was able to get with the Phase back. The ergonomics of the AFDIII, however, didn't do much for me. With a better body, Schneider lenses, better greens, and higher ISO values with a P40+, I might have to take a closer look at my options.

    Kurt

  45. #45
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    IMHO, the DF simply ROCKS! AF is about 2x as fast and more accurate with less hunting, and shutter lag is cut in about 1/2. Note however with the LS lens, I can in fact perceive the added release lag-time for that added steps required for the leaf shutter to fire -- it all begins immediately after the shutter press though, just takes longer to accomplish everything necessary before the actual fire.

    And the P40+ is amazing too!
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  46. #46
    Subscriber Member KurtKamka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,232
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    26

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Thanks Jack. Some nice options out there right now that I need to explore.

  47. #47
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by KurtKamka View Post
    Sorry to move this thread off-topic, Jack, but how do you like the newer Phase DF body? I loved the smoother tones, color and extra detail (from big files) I was able to get with the Phase back. The ergonomics of the AFDIII, however, didn't do much for me. With a better body, Schneider lenses, better greens, and higher ISO values with a P40+, I might have to take a closer look at my options.

    Kurt
    Kurt have to say bud. I am seriously impressed by the P40+. By far the best back I have owned and personally much better than the P45+ except the long exposure part. Other than that it beats it in every way. Tremendous ISO latitude , much more ACCURATE color is more the word for it. Simply put I'm on a high that I won't come down from and the DF is by far much better. Is it the best they can do No but it is far more workable and i am a fast shooter and have yet to yearn for a Canon/Nikon on all counts.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  48. #48
    Subscriber Member KurtKamka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,232
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    26

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    Good to hear Guy. You shoot the same types of things that I like to shoot, so I really value your opinion. After shooting with the new camera and back for a little while (and I think that it always takes a few weeks/months to form a valid opinion of the strengths and weaknesses of a system), how are you finding the high ISO performance? Do you ever utilize the Sensor + option or are the files looking good enough for you to not have to utilize the setting as often as you thought?

  49. #49
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    I use the Sensor Plus a lot on the event /Pr stuff and I am good all the way to ISO 1600 without any help from 3rd party noise reduction programs. That alone buried any thoughts of Canon/Nikon and at full res ISO 400 is singing very well too. Need to play around a little more with full res. ISO 800 it's clean but does have some noise. I'm being picky here as well. I honestly think you should demo it and see the improvements over the AFDIII and P45+. This seems to be the perfect balance of speed/ISO/ color/tonality/DR and I don't recommend anything lightly in MF but this system i do highly recommend it. A few folks here took my advice and went P40+ and they are singing the praises which makes me feel good i gave them the right direction to look. From me to you as a friend i think you should take another look. Now your going to kill me. LOL

    I'm so bad
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  50. #50
    Subscriber Member KurtKamka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,232
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    26

    Re: anyone got a Phase 110mm Schneider LS lens yet?

    I know you've demoed the S2, but I can't seem to get around that price tag. The H4D-40 might be the other option that I may look at ... but the down-side there is that I'm a C1 user and I'm familiar with the Phase system, lens line-up and files. As I'm currently tied to no system, however, maybe I just need to find a killer deal I just can't refuse.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •