Ben Rubinstein
Active member
Hi,
For the pro photographers working here, what do you do for backup backs? To have a backup body is a given but when you add the expense of a backup back it comes to the realisation that for a working pro who cannot afford to have a set rebuilt, or models rehired, or the loss of professionalism inherent in not being able to continue a shoot infront of clients - the cost of MFDB's is not just one back, it's two.
I'm not a MFDB shooter but I know from my wedding business that not only do I need to be able to go on shooting, I don't dare have a backup with lesser capability than my main body. If I advertise a certain quality, if I'm hired for it, then I cannot afford for my backup solution to be less than that. I would assume that for a pro needing a MFDB this would be far more relevant. My clients are not directors with specific image quality and size requirements, neither do my clients need work as fast as modern big shoot clients do (can film really be a backup if you can't process it fast enough to meet a deadline or if the director is not willing to sit over a lightbox anymore?).
I think that this question has brought the realisation about what kind of people are shooting MFDB's. These are people so serious that they in most probability need and own, or at least rent, a 2nd backup back for important shoots. So much above my league of photography that I'm hugely humbled by it. It's far nearer like TV production in scale and cost than a traditional studio like setting.
Yes I could afford a MFDB, 2nd hand ones are pretty affordable, however by the time I need MFDB I'm already in the realm of needing two of them...
For the pro photographers working here, what do you do for backup backs? To have a backup body is a given but when you add the expense of a backup back it comes to the realisation that for a working pro who cannot afford to have a set rebuilt, or models rehired, or the loss of professionalism inherent in not being able to continue a shoot infront of clients - the cost of MFDB's is not just one back, it's two.
I'm not a MFDB shooter but I know from my wedding business that not only do I need to be able to go on shooting, I don't dare have a backup with lesser capability than my main body. If I advertise a certain quality, if I'm hired for it, then I cannot afford for my backup solution to be less than that. I would assume that for a pro needing a MFDB this would be far more relevant. My clients are not directors with specific image quality and size requirements, neither do my clients need work as fast as modern big shoot clients do (can film really be a backup if you can't process it fast enough to meet a deadline or if the director is not willing to sit over a lightbox anymore?).
I think that this question has brought the realisation about what kind of people are shooting MFDB's. These are people so serious that they in most probability need and own, or at least rent, a 2nd backup back for important shoots. So much above my league of photography that I'm hugely humbled by it. It's far nearer like TV production in scale and cost than a traditional studio like setting.
Yes I could afford a MFDB, 2nd hand ones are pretty affordable, however by the time I need MFDB I'm already in the realm of needing two of them...