I did take a short detour into the world of MFD when I bought a used H3dii-31 a few months ago. The performance was not as convincingly better than the D3x that I call my own, so I sold it. The only remainder of the H set is the 50/3.5.
Now, after establishing a profound interest in landscape pictures and the desire to print big, I am (yet) again obsessing over the thought of taking the super high resolution MF route. Now, my conundrum that I am seeking to resolve with your help is to see which route to take.
Over time I have added a 503CW to my collection, as well as a Contax 645 (which I love to shoot 120 film with). As far as I can tell, my options are plentiful and it's making my head hurt.
I could get a MFDB for the Contax 645, I could get a digital back for the 503CW, or get a H4D-50 (just because I love me some shiny new toys, I mean tools). CVF-50 is a contender, P1 backs for the 645.
Oddly, B&H sells H4D kits with one lens for the same price they sell the body only for, which makes little sense to me, but I'd take it.
Help me make sense of the options on the basis of your experience, please. :toocool:
Thanks!
Vlad
Now, after establishing a profound interest in landscape pictures and the desire to print big, I am (yet) again obsessing over the thought of taking the super high resolution MF route. Now, my conundrum that I am seeking to resolve with your help is to see which route to take.
Over time I have added a 503CW to my collection, as well as a Contax 645 (which I love to shoot 120 film with). As far as I can tell, my options are plentiful and it's making my head hurt.
I could get a MFDB for the Contax 645, I could get a digital back for the 503CW, or get a H4D-50 (just because I love me some shiny new toys, I mean tools). CVF-50 is a contender, P1 backs for the 645.
Oddly, B&H sells H4D kits with one lens for the same price they sell the body only for, which makes little sense to me, but I'd take it.
Help me make sense of the options on the basis of your experience, please. :toocool:
Thanks!
Vlad