Site Sponsors
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 51

Thread: Kodak 50MP sensor

  1. #1
    Senior Member Graham Mitchell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    London/Kiev
    Posts
    1,079
    Post Thanks / Like

    Kodak 50MP sensor

    This is just about the 50MP sensor which Kodak announced recently. I received the spec sheet today:

    http://www.mediafire.com/?tzugyyqvzyy

    FWIW, the dynamic range seems to be around 11.5 stops.

  2. #2
    Natasa Stojsic
    Guest

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by foto-z View Post
    This is just about the 50MP sensor which Kodak announced recently. I received the spec sheet today:

    http://www.mediafire.com/?tzugyyqvzyy

    FWIW, the dynamic range seems to be around 11.5 stops.

    I can't remember where... but I read about Phase not being sure should they use Dalsa or Kodak sensor this time..... Perhaps, that could effect the size of megapixels, maybe even the size of the sensor itself!!! Anyway there is nothing on Dalsa website yet.

    Bottom line is obviously Kodak 50MP...

    Anybody/any info on that?
    Last edited by Natasa Stojsic; 8th July 2008 at 10:28.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Graham Mitchell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    London/Kiev
    Posts
    1,079
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    We just have to wait and see what Dalsa has been working on.

  4. #4
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by foto-z View Post
    We just have to wait and see what Dalsa has been working on.
    If anyone is more likely to jump beyond 645 it seems it would be Dalsa for the Sinar and Leaf Hy6 cameras ... and by extension, backs for legecy Hasselblad 6X6 cameras.

    I'd personaly like to have that, as opposed to a 50 meg 645.

    We'll just have to wait and see.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Graham Mitchell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    London/Kiev
    Posts
    1,079
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by fotografz View Post
    I'd personaly like to have that, as opposed to a 50 meg 645.
    Just to clarify, the new 50MP Kodak sensor is not 645, it's only 49x37mm. If Dalsa did release a 645 chip (56x42mm), it would be a step up and great news.

  6. #6
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    I think there are several surprises still out there folks.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  7. #7
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Jupiter, Fla.
    Posts
    1,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    I think there are several surprises still out there folks.
    Well... cough 'em up. We're paying big bucks to be members of this forum and we have a right to know

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Similar feelings about sharing info, unless things are under NDA, then do not even bother with "teases". While I understand how Photokina is THE big event for this kind of stuff, it seems a bit outdated at this point. The two year span worked well with film based things, but the world of digital is much faster in progression by comparison. Having products ready to go is also important, rather than announcing something being thought of or planned for 1-2 years out. Personally, if a manufacturer has a new or pending product, they should be talking about is as soon as they can or are confident for release. These higher ticket items may be another issue, and should be brought into discussions as early as is practical, not to jump the other competitors as much as to give prospective buyers some time to figure out upgrade paths, compatibilities, and stuff that matters for planning. How hard would it be for Hasselblad to tell folks that the planned 645 sensor was going to work on a redesigned H2F or something? How much does Dalsa (and Leaf and Sinar) gain by not talking about a new sensor they are considering? The games usually lead to much buzz, followed by lots of letdown around this time of year. So I say dump the data on the goods now, and forget about "leaks" and timing for Photokina. Just my opinion here.

    LJ

  9. #9
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Well someone show me the money than. LOL

    I just have a feeling this will be a banner year for MF.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  10. #10
    dlew308
    Guest

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    They should come out with it now, tell the masses now now now

  11. #11
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    420
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    I'm much more excited about the Hassy announcement that they are going to share information and their direction relative to a true 645 sensor at Photokina vs. the 50MP current size. Since Phase & Hassy use the same chip, I'm sure that they will do the same.

    Exciting.

    Ray

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    I agree, Ray. Hasselblad was very open (yes, a term many would not associate with them for some things) in announcing that they do have some stuff in the works, that it will be a year or so off, and that they will be talking about it. Not much hidden in that. Details? Not many, but enough to work with to start asking questions about planned bodies, backs, and things. This actually gives Hassy a lot of feedback through questions and customer speculations about how to progress with some of this stuff. That all seems healthier than wondering if Sinar will stick with Dalsa or go to Kodak, or wondering if Dalsa has a bigger sensor coming or not. This info gets leaked out anyway, on purpose or other ways, so better to get it straight from the manufacturers ASAP.

    LJ

  13. #13
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Firm believer in road maps. Just give us a idea if it don't happen fine but a path to follow is better than no path at all.

    Sounds like a quote, who did I steal that from.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  14. #14
    Subscriber Member KurtKamka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,232
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    26

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    With a small initial market, high prices and margins, a high level of competition between manufacturers trying to become the market leader and very eager dealers thrown into the mix, the whole process of acquiring a back feels very much like the process of buying an automobile (similar overall cost to the end-user). There's a host of dynamics that arise in that type of environment that are both pleasant and unpleasant.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Kurt,
    I agree with your assessment. From a strategic perspective, the MF companies need to be thinking more about growing their entire market, not just competing with each other to be the present market leader. If the entire pie gets bigger, there is more to go around ;-)

    Offering "entry level" gear at affordable prices is a great way to get folks using MF systems to start. The more backs they can sell, the more the R&D costs for new sensor development can be amortized across a larger number of units. Volume is the key. So rather than trying to "steal" market share from each other, the more successful strategy is to grow the entire market, as that translates into greater volumes for all players. The market leader thing gets sorted out by lots of things....total units sold or being used, customer service, new offerings, etc. Some may be more important than others, but in the end, the more backs/sensors they sell, the cheaper the costs for those sensors and the more money available to develop new things. Getting folks excited about an entire spectrum of gear offerings should be good business for all, but only if the new offerings can be seen to "fit" into what folks want and are willing to afford. My hope is that more folks get into MF to increase those sales and create more offerings and at more reasonable prices.

    LJ

  16. #16
    Natasa Stojsic
    Guest

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by foto-z View Post
    If Dalsa did release a 645 chip (56x42mm), it would be a step up and great news.
    I heard something... but I can't believe how cheap these DB makers are, so I'm not sure if the deal is going through or not!!! They can definitely do it now if they want to!!!

    Actually if these companies don't make the deal with Dalsa, I would rather see no increase in number of pixels but substantial cut in prices... that way they would WIN financially and improve their chances and I would do that at least for a year or two!!! Not to mention, there are plenty of things to improve that bother us, number of pixels not being one of them...

    Instead of arguing and making DB who holds x3 times more pixels than 1Ds MkIII, why not level the price P30+/etc. with 1Ds MkIII and let the game begin

    Anyway the price of P30+/etc will drop anyway, probably not enough though!!!

    If I was in DB business.... I would make sure that my entry level Camera P30+/etc. would cost not more than the entry level of VISA Credit Card, which I believe is $5000.00!!! That way everybody could have a decent chance/choice!!!

    And when I hear their Rep/PRs talking about how market is small..... OF COURSE IT'S SMALL, OBVIOUSLY THEY ARE SHRINKING IT!!!

  17. #17
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Prediction:

    Historically, (and I have no inside knowledge this is the case now, just speaking from years of marketing experience) the weakest new product to market usually knows it and tries to offset that by speaking first -- IOW if yours aint the best, get as big a head start as you can... That said, both Phase and Leaf have been inordinately silent in response to the Hassy 50MP announcement, so I suspect to hear something at least equal to and quite probably even more impressive when they do finally speak.

    What that is, I have no idea, but I would say the two "biggest" deals in our current MF world would be 1) a "bigger, faster or both" back and 2) a "lower cost or entry level" back...

    Cheers,
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado
    Posts
    2,077
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    Prediction:

    Historically, (and I have no inside knowledge this is the case now, just speaking from years of marketing experience) the weakest new product to market usually knows it and tries to offset that by speaking first -- IOW if yours aint the best, get as big a head start as you can... That said, both Phase and Leaf have been inordinately silent in response to the Hassy 50MP announcement, so I suspect to hear something at least equal to and quite probably even more impressive when they do finally speak.

    What that is, I have no idea, but I would say the two "biggest" deals in our current MF world would be 1) a "bigger, faster or both" back and 2) a "lower cost or entry level" back...

    Cheers,
    Jack

    I think that what you say is true from an historical perspective but, given Nikons early announcement of what appears to be a remarkable product in the D700, it might not continue to be true today. I am sure that Canon is going to respond with a new 5D replacement but that doesn't take away from the D700 in any way. They will probably both be very good and slightly different as each company plays to its market view and positioning.

    I expect the same in MF. Hassy has already announced not only the 50 Mpx back but also the very clever T/S product to solve some of the problems of MFDB compared to a technical camera.

    I am equally sure that Phase, Leaf, Sinar et al will be at the gates with their new thrills as well. It seems to me that we now have many choices and only our personal priorities dictate what we end up with. For instance I am not a technical camera shooter nor do I work with multiple MFDB systems (Good lord I can't afford the ONE I have!LOL) so the much more versatile Sinar system didn't get my vote over the Hassy. Anyway, the past 12 months have been a real renaissance for MF and I hope it continues. No matter what equipment we now own, competition and innovation can only be good for all of us who are part of this market.

    Best

    Woody

  19. #19
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    DPReview has a news story on the new sensor. There is an "editorial" portion written up that is not part of the press release which is a discussion of the new technology baked into this sensor. Sorry I can't give the direct link but it is easy to find on the front page.

  20. #20
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Here's how the actual delivery system works in relation to one another.

    The jump from 39 to 50 meg looks more substantual than the jump from 31 to 39 meg.

    Or is my math off here?

    Man, I can't even print that big with my 3800

    The new 4 channel technology in this Kodak chip sounds very interesting. Can't wait to see what it can do.
    Last edited by fotografz; 30th July 2008 at 05:15.

  21. #21
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    Prediction:

    Historically, (and I have no inside knowledge this is the case now, just speaking from years of marketing experience) the weakest new product to market usually knows it and tries to offset that by speaking first -- IOW if yours aint the best, get as big a head start as you can... That said, both Phase and Leaf have been inordinately silent in response to the Hassy 50MP announcement, so I suspect to hear something at least equal to and quite probably even more impressive when they do finally speak.

    What that is, I have no idea, but I would say the two "biggest" deals in our current MF world would be 1) a "bigger, faster or both" back and 2) a "lower cost or entry level" back...

    Cheers,
    Does that headstart theory apply to the Phase One/Mamiya camera announced some time ago but only shipping now Jack?

    If 50 meg sporting new imaging technology is the weakest news, all I can say is WOW! ... we are in for retina separating acceleration of MF developments.

    I think these companies are in a new age of marketing where interest has to be pre-gauged for small scale production purposes due to olympian outside costs.

    At this point of MF development I know quite a few shooters that are tapped out ... me being one of them. My lowly 39 meg will have to do for awhile unless the ecomomy picks up and business improves.

  22. #22
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Jack and My Phase body will be here Friday on schedule which initially was announced July for deliveries when it was released to the press.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    545
    Post Thanks / Like

    Cool Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Yes, it could be that there is another larger sensor in the cooking. It could be a 56mm square sensor to fit the Hy6/Afi or just true 645.
    If money is no object, I'd prefer a 56 square, but a smaller rectangle would be less expensive.
    If someone would ask me and money IS object, I would be fascinated with a 4:5 ratio sensor (of course, within a revolving back). It would be like shooting with a downscaled super hi-tec Mamiya Rz!!!!
    Why this format? - Well, in my years of heavy portrait studio shooting, I loved the Hassy 500Cm because the square allowed for some unintented leaning of the sitter. I never had to re-position my V camera. 4:5 ratio would allow generous sitter leaning too. One thing less to worry, now that with digital right focus is a lot more critical.
    So, my vote goes for a new 45X56mm sensor. the H system gets screwed. Ho, ho,ho.
    Eduardo


    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    Prediction:

    Historically, (and I have no inside knowledge this is the case now, just speaking from years of marketing experience) the weakest new product to market usually knows it and tries to offset that by speaking first -- IOW if yours aint the best, get as big a head start as you can... That said, both Phase and Leaf have been inordinately silent in response to the Hassy 50MP announcement, so I suspect to hear something at least equal to and quite probably even more impressive when they do finally speak.

    What that is, I have no idea, but I would say the two "biggest" deals in our current MF world would be 1) a "bigger, faster or both" back and 2) a "lower cost or entry level" back...

    Cheers,
    Last edited by Uaiomex; 9th July 2008 at 16:12. Reason: typo

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    492
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Hi Marc,

    Yes, your math is a little off, but your conclusions remain correct.

    Your numbers assume that the pixels are the same size in all three cases, which is not correct (and the sensors are not exactly the same in area either).

    Your values would be correct if the pixel sizes and sensor sizes were the same value for each of those image sizes. The correction is relatively minor, and if we standardize to the resolution of the 31MP print, the correct values would be:

    31MP image: 21.6 x 16.2 (inches)
    39MP image: 23.4 x 17.5 (inches)
    50MP image: 26.5 x 19.9 (inches)

    And for kicks, a hypothetical sensor of size 56mm x 42mm would compare as follows:
    For 7.2 micron pixels (45MP): 25.2 x 18.9 (inches)
    For 6.8 micron pixels (50MP): 26.7 x 20.0 (inches)
    For 6.4 micron pixels (57MP): 28.3 x 21.3 (inches)
    For 6.0 micron pixels (65MP): 30.2 x 22.7 (inches)

    David
    Last edited by David Klepacki; 9th July 2008 at 18:34.

  25. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    2,338
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    52

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Development shouldnt be confined to megapixel count - this is a dumb game.
    Give me better autofocus, image stabilisation and data management thank you.

  26. #26
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Jupiter, Fla.
    Posts
    1,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by PeterA View Post
    Development shouldnt be confined to megapixel count - this is a dumb game.
    Give me better autofocus, image stabilisation and data management thank you.
    Couldn't agree with you more Peter, and I assure you there's not a drop of sour grapes in my glass. Let me add an item to your list... an LCD that rivals or surpasses that in the Nikon D3. That would be something to crow about. I can understand the megapixel marketing in the prosumer category... a lot of those folks judge cameras simply on that basis. But in the MFDB arena the target market is much more sophisticated as well as both vocal and articulate about the kind of improvements they would like to see... and, IMHO, more megapixels isn't it.

  27. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    492
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    I couldn't agree more about the need for better usability features like autofocus and IS. However, if a manufacturer is going to properly support their ultra-wide lenses, then the additional megapixels make sense and are indeed beneficial. The perspective of these ultra-wide lenses "push" things much farther away and so more pixels are needed to resolve those "smaller" objects. For landscape shooters using such lenses, or even architectural photographers who print large enough, it can make the difference between sharp and blurred details.

    Personally, I am hoping to see a 56mm wide sensor someday soon, regardless of the number of megapixels, in order to get the wider field of view that my lenses have to offer. I would rather see a 56x42 or even better a 56x45 size sensor rather than the less wide 48x48 square that is being predicted...but David, I understand your point of view....more megapixels is not required for shooting half-naked models

  28. #28
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by David Klepacki View Post
    I couldn't agree more about the need for better usability features like autofocus and IS. However, if a manufacturer is going to properly support their ultra-wide lenses, then the additional megapixels make sense and are indeed beneficial. The perspective of these ultra-wide lenses "push" things much farther away and so more pixels are needed to resolve those "smaller" objects. For landscape shooters using such lenses, or even architectural photographers who print large enough, it can make the difference between sharp and blurred details.

    Personally, I am hoping to see a 56mm wide sensor someday soon, regardless of the number of megapixels, in order to get the wider field of view that my lenses have to offer. I would rather see a 56x42 or even better a 56x45 size sensor rather than the less wide 48x48 square that is being predicted...but David, I understand your point of view....more megapixels is not required for shooting half-naked models
    I tend to agree with this. I'd especially like to see what this new sensor can do on my Rollei Xact2 with the Rodenstock and Schneider Digital lenses. Might be worth renting one once it's available.

    There is a decent rumor that Hasselblad has saved the real news for Photokina ... a 56X45 back. If the new Kodak sensor technology is employed it will be more than 50 meg. We'll just have to wait and see.

    However, like Peter and others, I could care less about even more megs, or quite frankly even a true 645 sensor. I would be far more interested in multi-point AF and higher ISO performance in a 31 meg H camera to better replace a 35mm DSLR ... if I could do away with the need for a DSLR I could even afford to upgrade to a new 31 meg H3D-III/31

    My second unwavering desire is for a H focal plane body. That would seal the deal and complete the H system. I personally am not interested in one ot two leaf shutter lenses, I need all of them to be leaf shutters ... however, being able to use all the same lenses on a focal plane body would further eliminate the need for a DSLR.

    Are you listening Hasselbald? If you want to recruit even more sales from DSLR users bring forth the H focal plane camera body. 1/6000th shutter would be nice

    (I'm hoping that if I say it enough times and loud enough it'll happen )

  29. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,513
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Hey, Marc....I am completely with your wishes on these things. If Hassy could drop a focal plane shutter body into their H3Dxx mix, that would take all the glass, adapters, and backs in that line, it would be closer to nirvana, I think. I am with you on wanting to use one set of glass, rather than have separate or special "leaf shutter" lenses for use on a focal plane body. (In reality, it is not that different, but if one has a Phase/Mamiya body, they might be doubling up on lenses to shoot leaf shutter needs. That is not any different from Hassy putting out a separate focal plane body, but the idea of being able to use their existing leaf shutter lenses on it is the way to go at this point.)

    However we get there, let's just get there. And the other things you mentioned....higher ISO, multi-point AF, etc......all higher on MY list of things to start to completely replace the DSLRs. MP are enough already, but the other things are way behind.

    LJ

  30. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    492
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Well Marc, I have to get equal time for Sinar. The biggest shortcoming of the Hy6 is also the lack of a focal plane shutter....

    Are you listening Sinar? If you want to recruit even more sales from ALL users bring forth a Hy6 focal plane camera body. 1/8000th shutter would also be nice

  31. #31
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by Uaiomex View Post
    So, my vote goes for a new 45X56mm sensor. the H system gets screwed. Ho, ho,ho.
    Eduardo
    ... gets screwed. Ho, Ho, Ho. (A post from Santa Claus ????)

    Just curious, how would a true 645 digital sensor "screw" a 645 camera system? The HC 28mm would be cropped 1.1X, but all other lenses from 35mm to 300mm are full coverage 645 ... and all the 500 series Zeiss lenses from 30mm to 500mm can be used full 645. The H cameras are true 645. I shoot 120 film with one.

    Odd.

  32. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,311
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    I am just curious as to how much a 56x56mm sensor on a Sinar or Leaf would cost. If the 33mp, sub 645 sensors are circa 36000 (with camera), how much would the 56x56 be? 50,000? 60000? Does that include undercoating and heated leather seats?
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook

  33. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    2,338
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    52

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    I am going to start the anti-megapixel party.

  34. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    545
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Simple, a 45X56 mm sensor won't fit in any 645 camera. 645 cameras can take only 41.5X56 mm sensors or smaller.
    Kid, behave
    Love
    Santa.

    Quote Originally Posted by fotografz View Post
    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Uaiomex
    So, my vote goes for a new 45X56mm sensor. the H system gets screwed. Ho, ho,ho.
    Eduardo

    ... gets screwed. Ho, Ho, Ho. (A post from Santa Claus ????)

    Just curious, how would a true 645 digital sensor "screw" a 645 camera system? The HC 28mm would be cropped 1.1X, but all other lenses from 35mm to 300mm are full coverage 645 ... and all the 500 series Zeiss lenses from 30mm to 500mm can be used full 645. The H cameras are true 645. I shoot 120 film with one.

    Odd.

  35. #35
    thsinar
    Guest

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    ... am joining as vice-chairman!

    Thierry

    Quote Originally Posted by PeterA View Post
    I am going to start the anti-megapixel party.

  36. #36
    Senior Member yaya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,168
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    38

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart Richardson View Post
    I am just curious as to how much a 56x56mm sensor on a Sinar or Leaf would cost. If the 33mp, sub 645 sensors are circa 36000 (with camera), how much would the 56x56 be? 50,000? 60000? Does that include undercoating and heated leather seats?
    Maybe the bigger question is, if it WAS 60,000 and came with heated leather seats, would YOU BUY ONE?
    Yair Shahar | Product Manager | Phase One | Mamiya Leaf
    e: [email protected] | m: +44(0)77 8992 8199 | yaya's blog

  37. #37
    Natasa Stojsic
    Guest

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by yaya View Post
    Maybe the bigger question is, if it WAS 60,000 and came with heated leather seats, would YOU BUY ONE?
    instead of heated leather seats.... hy6 and set of lenses
    Amex/Master Card/Visa/Cash?

  38. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado
    Posts
    2,077
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by fotografz View Post
    I tend to agree with this. I'd especially like to see what this new sensor can do on my Rollei Xact2 with the Rodenstock and Schneider Digital lenses. Might be worth renting one once it's available.

    There is a decent rumor that Hasselblad has saved the real news for Photokina ... a 56X45 back. If the new Kodak sensor technology is employed it will be more than 50 meg. We'll just have to wait and see.

    However, like Peter and others, I could care less about even more megs, or quite frankly even a true 645 sensor. I would be far more interested in multi-point AF and higher ISO performance in a 31 meg H camera to better replace a 35mm DSLR ... if I could do away with the need for a DSLR I could even afford to upgrade to a new 31 meg H3D-III/31

    My second unwavering desire is for a H focal plane body. That would seal the deal and complete the H system. I personally am not interested in one ot two leaf shutter lenses, I need all of them to be leaf shutters ... however, being able to use all the same lenses on a focal plane body would further eliminate the need for a DSLR.

    Are you listening Hasselbald? If you want to recruit even more sales from DSLR users bring forth the H focal plane camera body. 1/6000th shutter would be nice

    (I'm hoping that if I say it enough times and loud enough it'll happen )
    Marc

    As you know I am a newbie to the Hassy system So far so good as the files are incredible. However I am with you on the need for a focal plane shutter H body! I refuse to sell my Hassy 110 2.0 as it is the best portrait lens I have ever owned (and I have a mint copy of the Contax/Zeiss 85 1.2 50 Jahre!) Sad that I cant use that, or any other FE lens on the H3DII body as it depends on the lens having a leaf shutter.

    I really feel that having both Leaf capability and Focal Plane capability is a must in today's MF world. Phase/mamiya already have the focal plane capability and keep hinting they will have some leaf shutter lenses soon. When they do they will put Hassy in a competitive disadvantage which Hassy MUST respond to with a Focal Plane body.

    I believe Hassy has done a great job providing things like the V to H adapter so that the investment many of their clients had made in V lenses was preserved! Good for you Hassy. Now complete the job and allow FE lenses to be used with H bodies. PLEASE!!!!!

    Woody

  39. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Istanbul/Turkey
    Posts
    339
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by foto-z View Post
    Just to clarify, the new 50MP Kodak sensor is not 645, it's only 49x37mm. If Dalsa did release a 645 chip (56x42mm), it would be a step up and great news.
    I have seen the data sheet that you have referred. Seeing the 6m pixel size makes one think that, in order to fit the 50MP in the 49X37mm area, they had to make the pixels smaller.

    Wouldn't it be theoretically possible to use 9m pixels in a true FF (56X42mm) in this 50MP sensor? Higher ISO and theoretically less noise, with same number and design for other data gathering and processing hardware.

    Or is there a DX type of preference also in the MF cameras, as once was the case in 35mm? (Nikon simply was not able to make a FF, and had to go tyhat way in real facts).

    The other question is: Who would want a 50 MP camera, while even 31MP is good enough for everything. Or isn't it?

    I have tested the H3DII-31 this weekend, and still can't believe my eyes. There's so much resolution, that it hurts the eyes. Any size prints can be made (my max is 40X60cm). All other parameters like correct color, good DR, excellent 800 ISO performance are there. Excellent film like results..

    That's why I wondered why one should pay twice the money for 50MP? (Note that I'm not professional photographer. I may not be fully awarw,e of professional's requirements, but can't think of any). The other problem may be the lenses, as it seemed to me..

    Seyhun

    Image from Dalyan/Turkey, to show the correct colors, especially Red's in the flag, and the greens. No retouching at all, except for histogram ajjustment to make DR less. In the background are the ancient tombs in the mountain.





    Seyhun
    Last edited by s.agar; 12th July 2008 at 14:07.
    H3DII-31, 5DII, M8, NEX-3 and Camera collection
    http://seyhun.com
    Facebook Page

  40. #40
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Jupiter, Fla.
    Posts
    1,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by David Klepacki View Post
    Well Marc, I have to get equal time for Sinar. The biggest shortcoming of the Hy6 is also the lack of a focal plane shutter....

    Are you listening Sinar? If you want to recruit even more sales from ALL users bring forth a Hy6 focal plane camera body. 1/8000th shutter would also be nice
    David,
    Don't be greedy... just use your Contax 645 body and you've got more than most

    Woody,
    Agree completely with your assessment of the Hassy 110 f/2 FE (as I'm sure you know). I use mine with the Mam-1 (or Son's) adapter on my Contax 645. One of these days I'll get around to comparing it with the Rollei 110 f/2 to see if there's any noticeable difference between them.

  41. #41
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1253

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    woody:
    might be that hassy is licking it's wounds over the limited success of the 200 series bodies. i have one and am a happy camper.

  42. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado
    Posts
    2,077
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by jlm View Post
    woody:
    might be that hassy is licking it's wounds over the limited success of the 200 series bodies. i have one and am a happy camper.
    Well John, like you I love my 200 series (203FE) and am sending it in to have it converted for use with the CFV II back. Then I can sell my other 500 bodies and use all of my V lenses, whether CFE, CFI or just CF with the modified 203FE. Hard to believe how long a life you can get from such equipment when you realize it was designed to last basically forever. Obviously not at state of the art performance levels but very satisfactory for real image making. The 503, with the CFV II back and the 40 CFE IF lens is still really a stunner. At the price ($12,500) this combo is hard to beat.

    Woody

  43. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,311
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    The reason the 200 series was not a success at the time was because they charged 7000 dollars for the freaking body. Just the body. In the mid 90s. I lucked out picking mine up on ebay before they took any of the digital backs, and it was a steal. I agree that it is one of the best cameras ever made, but it was priced more than any comparable camera today. It was more expensive than even the Hy6 is today. It was priced like Alpa.
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook

  44. #44
    Senior Subscriber Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,306
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    The 50MP image sensor is priced at $3500 in volume.

  45. #45
    Senior Member Graham Mitchell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    London/Kiev
    Posts
    1,079
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by Jan Brittenson View Post
    The 50MP image sensor is priced at $3500 in volume.
    What volume, out of curiosity? If there are only 10,000 digital backs from all brands being sold each year, then I assume that the number of 50MP backs sold per year will be 1000 at most. Maybe Hasselblad will be the only back maker using it, and Dalsa's larger 60MP chip will be stealing much of the high res market. (I have a feeling there is more news to come, too).

  46. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado
    Posts
    2,077
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Well I was lucky to find a used 203FE in mint condition for $2800. It costs another $500 to have it modified for use with the digital back (CFV) and included a full CLA to assure the body met its specs. I should have it back soon and will buy the CFV II kit with the 40 CFE IF lens (i already have one) and sell the new one to reduce the pain.

    For sure the 203FE and CFV II with the spectacular Hassy 110 2.0 is unbeatable for portraiture (IMHO). So after selling the 40 CFE IF for about $4K I will have invested a total of $8.5K in the 503 Digital kit and will be using the 203 as well. I will eventually pare down to just one of these bodies and for now at least I would guess the 203FE will win out.

    Great stuff

    Woody

  47. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado
    Posts
    2,077
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart Richardson View Post
    The reason the 200 series was not a success at the time was because they charged 7000 dollars for the freaking body. Just the body. In the mid 90s. I lucked out picking mine up on ebay before they took any of the digital backs, and it was a steal. I agree that it is one of the best cameras ever made, but it was priced more than any comparable camera today. It was more expensive than even the Hy6 is today. It was priced like Alpa.
    Stuart

    You are absolutely right about this. Photographers had other options which worked well and the price for 200 bodies was out of bounds.

    Lucky for all of us today the competition is driving prices. Companies can't get away with pricing as they once did. Just too many options for that to happen.

    As I said in another thread, three cheers for capitalism! MF is, and at the volume levels, will likely remain expensive. But there are four (five if you count Rollei) chasing those few customers and we keep getting better and better products. Not cheaply but we do get them.

    Will be interesting to see how Leaf and Sinar respond to the higher pixel wars, especially if Phase does have an exclusive arrangement for the 60Mpx Dalsa chip.

    Interesting times

    Woody

  48. #48
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Moscow
    Posts
    111
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by David Klepacki View Post
    Well Marc, I have to get equal time for Sinar. The biggest shortcoming of the Hy6 is also the lack of a focal plane shutter....

    Are you listening Sinar? If you want to recruit even more sales from ALL users bring forth a Hy6 focal plane camera body. 1/8000th shutter would also be nice
    Sinar does have a focal plane shutter system for more than 4 years. It is a Sinar-M, and you can mount all Hasselblad lenses on its AF Module. Actually, we rent the Sinar-M without lenses to a Hasselblad 203 shooter and he uses his own lenses without any problems.

    BTW I am a bit surprised that Sinar missed the opportunity to introduce a new focal plane integrated (not Modular) camera with a possibility to mount Rollei 6008/Hy6 optics. As I heard Zeiss has dropped the Sinaron-Hasselblad mount line of AF lenses. Even without Zeiss Sinar has all the ingredients for the success. They have a precise shutter (Sinar-M), very good AF and metering electronics (Hy6) and access to the sensors. IMO Mamiya ZD camera was not a professional product and its limitations are well known. I think that a compact modern multi -mount (Rollei + Hasselblad) camera will find acceptance.
    Yevgeny

  49. #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,311
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    I think the Sinar M may have a similar problem to the 203FE/205FE -- it is an interesting and capable system that is extraordinarily expensive. I am not saying it shouldn't be, but the reason that very few people are aware of it is because of its price. The 2008 SinarBron USA price list has the Sinar M at 8588. I am not sure what that includes. But to give you an idea, the list price of the AF 120/4 macro is 8156, the 180/4 is 9707, 40/4 is 12367 (!). Even the standard 80/2.8 is 6538. This is the most expensive kit I have ever seen. The lenses and body alone cost more than most digital backs, so it is no wonder that not many people have even heard of it.
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook

  50. #50
    Senior Subscriber Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,306
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Kodak 50MP sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by foto-z View Post
    What volume, out of curiosity?
    No idea, probably 1000s. But you could probably get 100s at close to the same price. If you're in the market.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •