Steve, you are of course correct. Use the camera that gives the best results. But, I can't help wondering where it all takes us. When the camera finally becomes so good that any idiot can make acceptable images, the romance will be gone and photos will be product.
Oh brave new world. True live view at 160 MP, auto DR mapping, ultraresolution, low noise high ISO and really effective image stabilization all there in your average $5K camera weighing a couple of pounds. It's inevitable. By then (about ten years), no one will care. Still images will be passe. When they are wanted, truly lifelike rendered images will be made without ever filling a lens. And there we will be. Perfect cameras that no one needs because there are so many excellent photos out there that everything is repetition. Isn't it better that we have to struggle a bit to make something good?
Yeah, I know. Luddite. Getting old. You know what I would like to see more than MF live view? An 8 x 10 film dingus that autoloads and unloads the holders. Oh yes, and an easy to use daylight developing system that is still in production. And a low cost drum scanner with automated loading. And ,.,, argh. Maybe the perfect digital camera isn't so bad.