plainwhiteshirt
Member
hey guys,
i'm thinking about droping analogue and switch to digital entirely...
i use a h3dII-50 for fashion/studio work but did always prefer film for documentary/portrait (on location, available light).
so far, so good... i'm happy with my h3dII-50 at ISO 50 & 100.
iso 200 looks okay, 400 is horrible though.
the recent documentary series were done with a mamiya 7II on the new portra (400-800 asa) which was okay.
question:
is there any digital back (is has to be a 50 or 60) digital back which performs better in high iso ranges than my current 50? how about the 60 and will there be something better (regarding high iso performance) in future? i'm just curious if it's worth getting rid of my analogue stuff and using digital instead.
as i decided to go for my h3dII-50 i had an early p65+ for comparison... it looked quite noisy/grainy, perhaps it was due to the early firmware?!?
cheers!
i'm thinking about droping analogue and switch to digital entirely...
i use a h3dII-50 for fashion/studio work but did always prefer film for documentary/portrait (on location, available light).
so far, so good... i'm happy with my h3dII-50 at ISO 50 & 100.
iso 200 looks okay, 400 is horrible though.
the recent documentary series were done with a mamiya 7II on the new portra (400-800 asa) which was okay.
question:
is there any digital back (is has to be a 50 or 60) digital back which performs better in high iso ranges than my current 50? how about the 60 and will there be something better (regarding high iso performance) in future? i'm just curious if it's worth getting rid of my analogue stuff and using digital instead.
as i decided to go for my h3dII-50 i had an early p65+ for comparison... it looked quite noisy/grainy, perhaps it was due to the early firmware?!?
cheers!