Dear Jack and Alan,
thanks for the replies and sorry for taking so long to get back on this. I was totally swamped lately.
I wanted to share with you this screen shot where both methods were applied ( PS: Automate> Photomerge and Script >"load into stack"... as described by Paul and Photomerge as suggested by Jack.
On the left side of the screen shot you see both individual images that got only basic work done in C1 with their respective LCC applied.
As mentioned before it left me with 2 distinctively different tonal values due to the differing LCC correction algorithm.
The middle image got stitched using Photomerge and the image on the right got the PS Script applied.
Basically my observation is: both methods come to the same result.
I have used Photomerge numerous times before and it works very well, BUT in tis case is turned out to be not sufficient enough.
The stitched photo shows too much differing cast which becomes even more obvious when seen in full size.
In the case of these 2 images: one was shot with no rise the other was shot with 24 mm rise. I think thats a situation where the LCC correction has to do so much work that it affects the color too much for PS Photomerge command come to an acceptable result.
My work-around so far has been to to adjust the individual RGB channels to match each other in C1 by pushing the sliders to the same value as compared to its sibling BEFORE I export the image and apply the stitch.
Grischa
thanks for the replies and sorry for taking so long to get back on this. I was totally swamped lately.
I wanted to share with you this screen shot where both methods were applied ( PS: Automate> Photomerge and Script >"load into stack"... as described by Paul and Photomerge as suggested by Jack.
On the left side of the screen shot you see both individual images that got only basic work done in C1 with their respective LCC applied.
As mentioned before it left me with 2 distinctively different tonal values due to the differing LCC correction algorithm.
The middle image got stitched using Photomerge and the image on the right got the PS Script applied.
Basically my observation is: both methods come to the same result.
I have used Photomerge numerous times before and it works very well, BUT in tis case is turned out to be not sufficient enough.
The stitched photo shows too much differing cast which becomes even more obvious when seen in full size.
In the case of these 2 images: one was shot with no rise the other was shot with 24 mm rise. I think thats a situation where the LCC correction has to do so much work that it affects the color too much for PS Photomerge command come to an acceptable result.
My work-around so far has been to to adjust the individual RGB channels to match each other in C1 by pushing the sliders to the same value as compared to its sibling BEFORE I export the image and apply the stitch.
Grischa