Hello guys.
I have been very busy doing other stuff, so I havent be able to look into
this problem until now.
Thanks for all your help and interest.
I have looked at the sensor and found nothing.
Didnt think I would either because the spots where to small to be dust
or anything like that.
Then I started to look at the pictures I took before and after the shot
I posted.
Some of them where pretty much similar to the one I posted, posing and lightning wise.
NONE of them had these spots.
I am talking about unmanipulated RAW files.
I had the back on NORMAL latency, low ISO, flash and in a studio
with temperature in the low 70s.
It must be something in the IQ140 processing of the RAW file is my guess.
Sorry for crying wolf too soon guys
.
I borrowed an IQ180 until I received my IQ140, and it was not
with an easy heart I returned it.
But I must say the IQ140 more than met my expectations!!!
Its different from the IQ180, but not in a bad way.
Straight out of the box, I think the files from IQ140 are less contrasty.
I havent been able to work enough with either two backs to come to
a conclusion.
And from now on it is only IQ140 anyway
.
I came from Nikon D3X and I told myself that the difference between
MFDB and D3X is so little that is not worth the extra money and hassle to
go for MFDB. And that was after I tested and owned H3D31 and H4D40.
And before the Hasselblad guys starts to knock me down
, I also meant
that after working with a PhaseOne P30+.
Looking at, and working with these IQ180 and IO140 files, I think the
difference is huge!
I am very happy with my purchase and equally happy with the help and
support I get on this forum.
Thanks again guys.
Willow