I'm starting to make a bit of a nuisance of myself asking one and all about mf and digital backs whilst I "research" all the options within my needs and funds.
For my photography, which has been predominantly with transparency, I often like the camera facing into the sun/ light, resulting in lots of blacks when I prefer to keep to the highs and conversely, blowouts with the lows.
I think a digital back will possibly help me reduce these extremes in my images because of their greater dynamic range.
I'd like to know if there are any backs that are better than others for dealing with such strong contrast, highlights, etc., which would be better to avoid or whether there isn't enough differences between them to matter, if I am making myself clear. For instance, I get an impression that the early CFV backs seem to handle these situations with aplomb.
Thank you for your considered replies.
Martin
For my photography, which has been predominantly with transparency, I often like the camera facing into the sun/ light, resulting in lots of blacks when I prefer to keep to the highs and conversely, blowouts with the lows.
I think a digital back will possibly help me reduce these extremes in my images because of their greater dynamic range.
I'd like to know if there are any backs that are better than others for dealing with such strong contrast, highlights, etc., which would be better to avoid or whether there isn't enough differences between them to matter, if I am making myself clear. For instance, I get an impression that the early CFV backs seem to handle these situations with aplomb.
Thank you for your considered replies.
Martin