This I can understand, but if a pro landscape photographer only takes 10 shots a week and thinks that nothing short of 10 * 8 film is good enough, what would he use?Have not shot film in at least 10 years. I would be out of business. I don't personally know of anybody as a Pro that still does for commerce. It's just not a option.
For amateurs, and pros taking technically difficult shots, the advantage of digital is instant feed back... do you remember spending a day making several different exposures (using different light sources and filters) on one sheet of 5*4 sheet film, and not knowing if you had got it right till days later?
I agree that MF film has very little appeal to anyone.