We don't. They do.Why do we even need revolutionary?
While there has always been tension regarding how much is too much or too little, the rate of digital revolution (because they can do it) has become a juggernaut designed to separate us from our money in ever tightening cycles.
So instead of refining and improving something like the A900, we get a whole new experience whether we like it or not. Or a Sony NEX5, then 5N, then 7, then 6 ... wonder when the NEX1, 2, 3 and 4 will debut?
By the time you get something down pat so it disappears in your hands while making images, the next "mandatory" all new all singing/dancing thing barges its way into the process, and you start all over. :thumbdown:
(Pardon me as I pull my teeth out and gum the next sentence while doing my best Walter Brennan imitation): :lecture:
Why youngin, used to be you'd buy a Nikon Pro body and the next one didn't show up for 7 or 8 years. Now, just because the media changed, we have to contend with all this hoopla almost all the time.
Haven't seen a Nikon digital body the equal of the F6 yet. Haven't noticed the pictures getting any better either.
-Marc
Last edited: