Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
I would say low resolution by today’s standards, but the quality is there. Nice image!This is from around 2003 and shot with a Contax 645 and Kodak DCS Pro back. Only 16 megapixels. Pretty poor quality by today's standards.
View attachment 148517
It may look that way at this small size but the file leaves a lot to be desired besides low resolution. So no I don't agree.I would say low resolution by today’s standards, but the quality is there. Nice image!
That makes sense. Oh well...It may look that way at this small size but the file leaves a lot to be desired besides low resolution. So no I don't agree.
P20 and the 'bad' Mamiya 35mm f3.5 N manual focus lens.
On having no tilt / swing is of course a limitation
What I have read is that even the AF version of 35mm is considered 'soft' in the corners and periphery.How is it bad?
I have the MAMIYA - SEKOR C 35mm/3.5 N
The N version has better multicoating than the C version and I try to use N with digital and C with film.I use a few "N" lens with my Fuji gfx and find them very acceptable for my use.