Bill_Green
Member
Re: Fun with MF images - Part 3
You could be right, I don't have the lens I'm and just going off images others have posted. I do have a non-apo 90/2 and they definitely render differently than the images I have seen of the 110. I'm guessing it has to do with the imaging surface (film or sensor) being far larger on MF that 35 mm.hmm, I am not convinced that people could tell the difference between the 110/2 and the 75/1.4 summilux, given web jpgs...the lenses are SO similar. I would post some images to test, but I have to go to bed, and it would take time to resize them so as not to give it right away (of course, most of my 110/2's are 6x6, and my 75/1.4's 2:3)