The GetDPI Photography Forum

Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!

Fun with MF images - ARCHIVED - FOR VIEWING ONLY

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ed Hurst

Well-known member
So, following yesterday's entirely genuine post, let me follow up with something rare for me - something where I have done significant Photoshop 'playing' to produce something substantially different from what was...

First, a little explaining. This château is lit up until 2am a variety of garish and ever-changing colours. This means that taking back-to-back shots and stacking them for star trails leads to some rather odd effects. In the sky and on the building, I was able to minimise this through a combination of colour balance, curves and the like - and, in the case of the building, overlaying a single frame with nice lighting. But, in the water area, the movement of the surface (with its consequent scattering of the light) meant that the colours and patterns were all over the place - in a way that interfered with the reflected star trails. So there was no way in which I could get rid of the messy lighting effect and still have genuine reflected trails. Well, apart from re-starting my shoot at 2am - which, on this occasion, I couldn't do.

So, with the picture posted yesterday, I simply accepted I wasn't going to have reflected trails - and used the static shot for that area too. This absence of star reflections often happens anyway with water in motion, when the reflections aren't distinct enough to show up. So it looks convincing. But, being an obsessive, it bothered me! So, I set out to create the reflected scene as well as I could.

And this is what you see here...

[/url]StarTrailsFromFilesIMGP7352-8710_VERSION2_Step12sRGBCropSMALL by Ed Hurst, on Flickr[/IMG]

By the way, for anyone who doubts that reflected star trails really happen, take a look at these shots. There's no jiggery pokery here - it's entirely genuine:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/45456901275/in/dateposted/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/14793972756/in/album-72157632566383126/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/14814203911/in/album-72157632566383126/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/28282979892/in/album-72157632566383126/
 

Landscapelover

Senior Subscriber Member
Hi Ed,

It's a fantastic captured. Just amazing!!!
Your talent, passion and dedication are very inspirational.
Congratulations!!!

Best,

Pramote


So, following yesterday's entirely genuine post, let me follow up with something rare for me - something where I have done significant Photoshop 'playing' to produce something substantially different from what was...

First, a little explaining. This château is lit up until 2am a variety of garish and ever-changing colours. This means that taking back-to-back shots and stacking them for star trails leads to some rather odd effects. In the sky and on the building, I was able to minimise this through a combination of colour balance, curves and the like - and, in the case of the building, overlaying a single frame with nice lighting. But, in the water area, the movement of the surface (with its consequent scattering of the light) meant that the colours and patterns were all over the place - in a way that interfered with the reflected star trails. So there was no way in which I could get rid of the messy lighting effect and still have genuine reflected trails. Well, apart from re-starting my shoot at 2am - which, on this occasion, I couldn't do.

So, with the picture posted yesterday, I simply accepted I wasn't going to have reflected trails - and used the static shot for that area too. This absence of star reflections often happens anyway with water in motion, when the reflections aren't distinct enough to show up. So it looks convincing. But, being an obsessive, it bothered me! So, I set out to create the reflected scene as well as I could.

And this is what you see here...

[/url]StarTrailsFromFilesIMGP7352-8710_VERSION2_Step12sRGBCropSMALL by Ed Hurst, on Flickr[/IMG]

By the way, for anyone who doubts that reflected star trails really happen, take a look at these shots. There's no jiggery pokery here - it's entirely genuine:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/45456901275/in/dateposted/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/14793972756/in/album-72157632566383126/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/14814203911/in/album-72157632566383126/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/28282979892/in/album-72157632566383126/
 
D

Deleted member 7792

Guest
So, following yesterday's entirely genuine post, let me follow up with something rare for me - something where I have done significant Photoshop 'playing' to produce something substantially different from what was...

First, a little explaining. This château is lit up until 2am a variety of garish and ever-changing colours. This means that taking back-to-back shots and stacking them for star trails leads to some rather odd effects. In the sky and on the building, I was able to minimise this through a combination of colour balance, curves and the like - and, in the case of the building, overlaying a single frame with nice lighting. But, in the water area, the movement of the surface (with its consequent scattering of the light) meant that the colours and patterns were all over the place - in a way that interfered with the reflected star trails. So there was no way in which I could get rid of the messy lighting effect and still have genuine reflected trails. Well, apart from re-starting my shoot at 2am - which, on this occasion, I couldn't do.

So, with the picture posted yesterday, I simply accepted I wasn't going to have reflected trails - and used the static shot for that area too. This absence of star reflections often happens anyway with water in motion, when the reflections aren't distinct enough to show up. So it looks convincing. But, being an obsessive, it bothered me! So, I set out to create the reflected scene as well as I could.

And this is what you see here...



By the way, for anyone who doubts that reflected star trails really happen, take a look at these shots. There's no jiggery pokery here - it's entirely genuine:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/45456901275/in/dateposted/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/14793972756/in/album-72157632566383126/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/14814203911/in/album-72157632566383126/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/16063951@N00/28282979892/in/album-72157632566383126/
You had me at "jiggery pokery". :D

Ed, you're a master at night sky photography and night photography in general. Pramote nailed it - talent, passion and dedication. Congratulations and thank you for sharing your inspirational work with the rest of us (who are still asleep).

Joe
 

cerett

Member
You had me at "jiggery pokery". :D

Ed, you're a master at night sky photography and night photography in general. Pramote nailed it - talent, passion and dedication. Congratulations and thank you for sharing your inspirational work with the rest of us (who are still asleep).

Joe
Hi Joe,

Always fun to read your posts and I hope the year has been good to you and your family. I do want to ask you what "jiggery pokery" means. Is that some kind of Southern jargon? Have a great Thanksgiving!

Marty
 

Ed Hurst

Well-known member
Thanks so much, guys! All i can say is right back at you - your work inspires me!

On the phrase "jiggery pokery", to my knowledge it's a British expression (certainly used widely there, where I grew up and currently live). It means sort of cunning or manipulative antics that might lead to misleading others, while also implying some ingenuity. The playfulness of its tone means it can refer both to serious such actions and more lighthearted occasions, of the "ooh, you are naughty, aren't you dear!" kind...
 

drunkenspyder

Well-known member
So, following yesterday's entirely genuine post, let me follow up with something rare for me - something where I have done significant Photoshop 'playing' to produce something substantially different from what was...

First, a little explaining. This château is lit up until 2am a variety of garish and ever-changing colours. This means that taking back-to-back shots and stacking them for star trails leads to some rather odd effects. In the sky and on the building, I was able to minimise this through a combination of colour balance, curves and the like - and, in the case of the building, overlaying a single frame with nice lighting. But, in the water area, the movement of the surface (with its consequent scattering of the light) meant that the colours and patterns were all over the place - in a way that interfered with the reflected star trails. So there was no way in which I could get rid of the messy lighting effect and still have genuine reflected trails. Well, apart from re-starting my shoot at 2am - which, on this occasion, I couldn't do.

So, with the picture posted yesterday, I simply accepted I wasn't going to have reflected trails - and used the static shot for that area too. This absence of star reflections often happens anyway with water in motion, when the reflections aren't distinct enough to show up. So it looks convincing. But, being an obsessive, it bothered me! So, I set out to create the reflected scene as well as I could.
Wow. Amazing Ed.
 

drunkenspyder

Well-known member
Re: 4 minutes of Vestrahorn Sunrise

After almost 8 months from my last visit, I am almost ready to go back to Iceland for about two weeks of photography there! Iceland is always beautiful, but in winter is truly amazing and I am very excited to be there again. Here's a shot from my last visit, taken at the amazing Vestrahorn mountain:



236 seconds (almost 4 minutes) of exposure with my Hasselblad X1D, Hasselblad XCD 21mm and Formatt-HItech Firecrest Ultra filters.

Thank you for viewing, best regards

Vieri
Beautiful Vieri. Can't wait!
 

drunkenspyder

Well-known member
Back to the Empire State Plaza. The Corning Erastus Tower & Egg. Three image vertical stitch, plus crop for detail [such as GetDPI shows].

ErastmusEgg_Panorama-3-FrameShop.jpg

ErastmusEgg_Panorama-3Crop-FrameShop.jpg

X1D v1 | Nikon 19PC | f/4 | 1/20-1.3s | ISO 100
 

Ed Hurst

Well-known member
Back to the Empire State Plaza. The Corning Erastus Tower & Egg. Three image vertical stitch, plus crop for detail [such as GetDPI shows].

X1D v1 | Nikon 19PC | f/4 | 1/20-1.3s | ISO 100
Stunning picture! I hope you don't mind the query, but is the halo around the building intentional?
 

anyone

Well-known member
Helsinki.jpg
Helsinki - more or less a test shot for my new CFE 40mm IF. Still learning with this lens.

Hasselblad 500CM, CFE 40mm IF, P45+, Stitch of 2 images.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top