kdphotography
Well-known member
It's the kind of paper that you use when acquiring 500+ hp camera bags... :ROTFL:
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Again, the IQ280/IQ180/Credo80 would fit such purpose, not the IQ260.Then again there's still plenty of folks that don't require extra long exposure times but do demand full frame sensors and as much resolution as possible. To them anything else is just a door stopper.....
Hey, are you calling our IQ260's ugly?? I may have to ask you to step outside for a 'chat' ... :argue: (Just kidding)Again, the IQ280/IQ180/Credo80 would fit such purpose, not the IQ260.
Spoken as a true gentleman, with the eloquence of an enabler of the highest caliber and most honored standing in Dante's forum....I don't see myself swapping the IQ260, just adding another option for the DF+ and potentially an FPS in the future to complement the Alpa.
N+1Just how many backs does Graham now own????
With all due respect, would you mind sharing RAW files of a side by side comparison between the P45+ and the IQ260 for long exposure? (preferably at 8 minutes or longer)Indeed. I used to take actual long exposures with the IQ260. We even did IQ260 long exposure testing to show how good they were.
Personally I thought the results, at 8 minutes, under non-ideal lighting, with difficult dark subject matter with lots of detail, were pretty darn good.
But now that I've heard it's crap for long exposures, we'd better just keep those backs in our safe.
That's just bad etiquette in Dante's Forum. It's like asking a woman her age. Unless she offers, it's better not to ask.Just how many backs does Graham now own????
Could you also post photos of the backs of the P45+ and the IQ260 MFDBs? I would say if you publish photos of the rear LCD screens and interface, we will be able to see that the IQ260 actually did better, uh, P45+screen---nevermind.With all due respect, would you mind sharing RAW files of a side by side comparison between the P45+ and the IQ260 for long exposure? (preferably at 8 minutes or longer)
My claim is based on comparison, not adhoc results. I would say if you publish the P45+ RAW files as well as the IQ260 RAW files, we will be able to see that the P45+ actually did better than this.
We (Digital Transitions) maintain and continually update a large raw catalog (>100gb) which we open to our clients making such evaluations. This includes a variety of P45+ to IQ260 comparisons. Moreover we provide access to whatever digital back system someone would like to make tests or comparisons for.With all due respect, would you mind sharing RAW files of a side by side comparison between the P45+ and the IQ260 for long exposure? (preferably at 8 minutes or longer)
My claim is based on comparison, not adhoc results. I would say if you publish the P45+ RAW files as well as the IQ260 RAW files, we will be able to see that the P45+ actually did better than this.
First and foremost, congratulations to Rick, Enjoy the back!!With all due respect, would you mind sharing RAW files of a side by side comparison between the P45+ and the IQ260 for long exposure? (preferably at 8 minutes or longer)
My claim is based on comparison, not adhoc results. I would say if you publish the P45+ RAW files as well as the IQ260 RAW files, we will be able to see that the P45+ actually did better than this.
Would you mind sharing a link to download please? These have to be under the same condition, same time and location, same composition, same amount of highlight details.We (Digital Transitions) maintain and continually update a large raw catalog (>100gb) which we open to our clients making such evaluations. This includes a variety of P45+ to IQ260 comparisons. Moreover we provide access to whatever digital back system someone would like to make tests or comparisons for.