My thoughts after staring at these for a few hours...I have all of these lenses and am quite familiar with their performance on an IQ180.
The colors are quite different between the CCD backs and the IQ3 100MP, but will wait until 9.0.3 is out. Shadow recovery is pretty awesome!
I did not use LCC, but used the lens profiles for the Rodie lenses and played with sharpness/light falloff.
23HR - Looks very good. Good enough that I'd want to compare between a CCD back with this lens to see if there is anything substantial.
32HR - So far this is my biggest disappointment. It is my favourite lens of all time and does not appear to fair too well with the new back. A shift of 10mm looks far worse than an 18mm on the 40HR. Will wait for 9.0.3 for final conclusions, but this could be a deal breaker.
40HR - simply beautiful, just awesome! Wish the 32HR could perform this well.
60XL - Hmmm....There are IQ280 samples to compare against so this was quite interesting. There is definitely some kind of purple/magenta cast going on in the IQ3/100. This is without LCC on both files. Sharpness/smearing in the extreme shifts looks about the same. If the LCC can clean up the colour issues, I think this lens will be just fine. As far as resolution, I'm not seeing any huge advantage for the 100MP back, noise and shadow detail are a different story.
90HR - Just awesome! Same feeling as 40HR. I am assuming this is the 90HRSW.
120XL - Samples look like the lens is decentered. This is an incredible lens, and something has to be off here. Also, assuming the is the 120XL ASPH.
Appreciate hearing about what others are seeing.
Also want to thank CI again, looking at the files again, I can appreciate all the work that went into this. Also would be curious at to which lenses used the CF (23,32,40,60).