Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 41 of 41

Thread: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    198
    Post Thanks / Like

    Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Now perhaps, this actually being NOT a troll post, might not get the traction that some others recently have, but here goes, since I really need to ask the question.

    I've spent the last 4 years working with the following:

    -Leica S-006 + 30-90 + 100f2 + 30 non-cs. I'm OK with everything, save the 2x3 format. Most of my work is cropped to either 5x4 format or 1x1 square.
    -Hassy V with film backs.
    -Phase DF+ and IQ 280,
    -Recently for 2 months on 2 jobs: Phase XF + IQ3100.
    -A currently backless Alpa STC with 40HR.

    The Leica S and Hassy V I own. All other gear was borrowed / limited use rentals etc.
    I would like to have print sizes upto a metre on the short side.
    I will be getting into Digital MF 'once and for all' by the end of this year.

    My conundrum is this: Should I consider the H6D over the XF ? Hasselblad will give me a good rebate on my S-006.
    Should I consider the Pentax 645z (weather-sealed and 4x3) and sell the S006 ?
    Should I wait for the Pentax (next edition) since they have access to the sony sensor as well?

    It is interesting to note that the Hasselblad marketing until now has been way way behind the phase marketing. They never even marketed their 'True-focus'. That's illogical !!
    TBH, the excessive phase marketing is what has prompted me to ask this question in the first place.
    Any input on Hasselblad dealerships in Australia?

    Thanks for your inputs.

    Saty

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    876
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Well here are a few thoughts

    First of all it is a Photokina year. Even though the show isn't what is was ten years ago we will see lots of announcements running up to the show. I expect more from Sony, Leica, Pentax, Nikon, (Canon), Hasselblad and Phase One.

    So my first question is how long can/do you want to wait till you make the steps.

    Next important thing is what do you need. Just a SLR style body, the h6d is a great option and I would go with it over the XF.

    If you want to use the back on a technical camera I would choose Phase One. In my opinion using a Hasselblad.

    You are correct that waiting for the Pentax would probably save even more. Here the question is flexibility.

    Have to run now. More later.
    Christopher Hauser
    My iPhone / iPad Apps
    http://www.hauser-photoart.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    313
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by satybhat View Post
    Now perhaps, this actually being NOT a troll post, might not get the traction that some others recently have, but here goes, since I really need to ask the question.

    I've spent the last 4 years working with the following:

    -Leica S-006 + 30-90 + 100f2 + 30 non-cs. I'm OK with everything, save the 2x3 format. Most of my work is cropped to either 5x4 format or 1x1 square.
    -Hassy V with film backs.
    -Phase DF+ and IQ 280,
    -Recently for 2 months on 2 jobs: Phase XF + IQ3100.
    -A currently backless Alpa STC with 40HR.

    The Leica S and Hassy V I own. All other gear was borrowed / limited use rentals etc.
    I would like to have print sizes upto a metre on the short side.
    I will be getting into Digital MF 'once and for all' by the end of this year.

    My conundrum is this: Should I consider the H6D over the XF ? Hasselblad will give me a good rebate on my S-006.
    Should I consider the Pentax 645z (weather-sealed and 4x3) and sell the S006 ?
    Should I wait for the Pentax (next edition) since they have access to the sony sensor as well?

    It is interesting to note that the Hasselblad marketing until now has been way way behind the phase marketing. They never even marketed their 'True-focus'. That's illogical !!
    TBH, the excessive phase marketing is what has prompted me to ask this question in the first place.
    Any input on Hasselblad dealerships in Australia?

    Thanks for your inputs.

    Saty
    I'm a Hasselblad user and fan.
    Phase make great gear and have done for a while. Hasselblad have been quiet for a while after (IMO) some very poorly executed partnerships with other companies.

    The good news is that Hasselblad is back. They really are. Their new offering has (IMO) the edge on the competition (but don't think for a moment that Phase are sitting about doing nothing)

    True focus is great and works.

    The Pentax AFAIK is a good unit but doesn't really have the depth of lenses and accessories.

    In Aussie you'll be dealing with CR Kennedy and specifically with Damon Rulach. Damon is an excellent resource, tell him I sent you.
    Feel free to contact me direct with any questions and I'm sure others will chime in.

    Nick-T
    Last edited by Nick-T; 15th April 2016 at 01:53.
    www.nick-t.com
    http://www.hasselbladdigitalforum.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  4. #4
    Senior Member ErikKaffehr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Nyköping Sweden
    Posts
    1,191
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Hi,

    What are your needs? Does the Pentax 645Z offer any significant advantage over the Leica S (006) for your needs?

    You could consider the Hasselblad VFC backs, it may even be a 100 MP VFC around the corner. That would be fine with your Hasselblad and the Alpa. Or you could consider an older P-series back. That would not work if you need AF.

    Do you have lenses for the Leica?

    CMOS backs have:

    • Better high ISO
    • Less readout noise (cleaner shadows)
    • Live view
    • Less issues with colour aliasing


    But at least some (IQ-260) CCD backs may work better with near symmetrical wide angles.

    Best regards
    Erik



    Quote Originally Posted by satybhat View Post
    Now perhaps, this actually being NOT a troll post, might not get the traction that some others recently have, but here goes, since I really need to ask the question.

    I've spent the last 4 years working with the following:

    -Leica S-006 + 30-90 + 100f2 + 30 non-cs. I'm OK with everything, save the 2x3 format. Most of my work is cropped to either 5x4 format or 1x1 square.
    -Hassy V with film backs.
    -Phase DF+ and IQ 280,
    -Recently for 2 months on 2 jobs: Phase XF + IQ3100.
    -A currently backless Alpa STC with 40HR.

    The Leica S and Hassy V I own. All other gear was borrowed / limited use rentals etc.
    I would like to have print sizes upto a metre on the short side.
    I will be getting into Digital MF 'once and for all' by the end of this year.

    My conundrum is this: Should I consider the H6D over the XF ? Hasselblad will give me a good rebate on my S-006.
    Should I consider the Pentax 645z (weather-sealed and 4x3) and sell the S006 ?
    Should I wait for the Pentax (next edition) since they have access to the sony sensor as well?

    It is interesting to note that the Hasselblad marketing until now has been way way behind the phase marketing. They never even marketed their 'True-focus'. That's illogical !!
    TBH, the excessive phase marketing is what has prompted me to ask this question in the first place.
    Any input on Hasselblad dealerships in Australia?

    Thanks for your inputs.

    Saty
    Homepage: http://echophoto.dnsalias.net
    Articles: http://echophoto.dnsalias.net/ekr/in.../photoarticles
    Portfolio: http://echophoto.smugmug.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    598
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Leica S-006 + 30-90 + 100f2 + 30 non-cs.
    In Hasselblad, the equivalent would be H6D-50c, 35-90, 100f/2.2 and 28. You'll lose a bit on aperture and on wide-angle on the zoom.

    Whatever you do, make sure you get to take these cameras in your hands as their weight, balance and ergonomics are surprisingly different (H, Pentax, Phase).
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  6. #6
    Senior Member Dogs857's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Thursday Island - Australia
    Posts
    307
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Just a thought mate but why not keep the 006 , you already own it after all.

    Is there something that it is not doing for you?? Printing 1m on the short edge from that camera should be fairly easy. Ask Mat (mjr) he used one for years and took some cracking photos with it. I understand if you are always cropping it can be a bit of a pain, but on the plus side should you want to take a one shot panorama then the 2:3 format is a lot better than 3:4.

    Another cheaper way in would be a Pentax 645, D or Z. AFAIK the D has a similar sensor to the 006 so if you like that camera you may like a 645D and they are pretty cheap for low shutter second hand units. You could pick up a couple and be on your way.

    I know I have owned a lot of gear in the past, and the only things that I regret having to sell was my Phase One gear.
    Stop chasing gear, start chasing photos instead.

    Jeff, but my friends call me Dogs
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  7. #7
    Member AreBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Highlands, Scotland
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Christopher,

    If you want to use the back on a technical camera I would choose Phase One. In my opinion using a Hasselblad.

    Have to run now. More later.
    In your opinion, using a Hasselblad... what?

  8. #8
    Senior Member Dogs857's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Thursday Island - Australia
    Posts
    307
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Well he did say he had to run
    Stop chasing gear, start chasing photos instead.

    Jeff, but my friends call me Dogs
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    876
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by Dogs857 View Post
    Well he did say he had to run
    Haha

    Ok yeah that was not intended. In my opinion, the Hasselblad isn't the best way to go for tech cameras. Yes it works, but I would really prefer not having some strange battery solution.
    Christopher Hauser
    My iPhone / iPad Apps
    http://www.hauser-photoart.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North Sweden
    Posts
    1,401
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    What subjects are you shooting Saty? Commercial or for pleasure?

    To be honest, you have shot with some really fantastic kit and you're probably in a better position to offer advice than most! If you have a really clear idea of what you want to shoot and what the output will be then the options will naturally present themselves I would think.

    I decided ages ago that if I need something to work with then I would look at what I could shoot with now and go with what suited best, what might be around the corner is of no interest to me if I need to be working now. That said, with the Hasselblad not far off being in the shops then you're in a great position to try it and compare against your XF experiences.

    Bottom line is what are you missing from what you already own? What has renting kit told you about what's available now? And just as important, what do you want to shoot with?! If I was asking the same questions as you, I'd have the S 006 kit for portrait work, love it! Keep my IQ260 and Cambo just for architecture projects as it's brilliant and buy a D500 for the odd event/low light jobs, that would do everything! I have sold hundreds of prints from the S at decent sizes and have a number of 60x120cm cropped panos on my walls from single files and they look really nice, I wouldn't be worried about the S files keeping up. Have you tried the 007?

    Looking forward to hearing what you go with.

    Mat
    http://matrichardson.com/
    Workshops for 2018! http://www.matrichardson.com/workshops
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Little Rock AR
    Posts
    1,926
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Saty:

    I am confused, in your list, you have IQ3100 and XF listed, would you want 2 100MP backs, both Hasselblad and Phase?

    Just curious as both will require different raw converters, C1 and Phocus and neither works with the others files, thus 2 totally different workflows. I guess you can use LR for both.

    Paul C

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North Sweden
    Posts
    1,401
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    I think he rented the XF and 3100 Paul, he's now thinking of buying a kit for himself rather than renting, hence wondering if the 'blad might be better, I don't think anyone has actually shot a production H6D100 yet though.

    Mat

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Little Rock AR
    Posts
    1,926
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Hi Mat,

    Thanks, I was wondering. One other thought, unless Hasselblad has stocked up chips, the wait on their 100MP will not be a short one.

    Back to the question, it will be a tough call for sure as both platforms have a great solution now. For me with a lot of P1/Mamiya glass, the choice was easy to stay in the P1 lineup. The XF has delivered for me.

    Paul C

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,587
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    I'd keep the S006, buy the Hasselblad H6D-50c and some H lenses, the H lens adaptor for Leica S so you can mix and match lenses with your S, and get shooting...

    Best of all worlds there if you ask me
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North Sweden
    Posts
    1,401
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    If I was spending Saty's money and I was going to do as tjv suggests and mix the S with a Hasselblad then for me it wouldn't be the 50c, it's another crop sensor and the S lenses are so good, I would have to have the 100c to give some value to the blad over the S. Just my opinion and Saty's money! Haha!

    I don't know what Saty's priorities are, for me, the only reason to add a XF or H6 to the S would be to have the option of a tech cam for architecture or landscapes, the Phase would win for me in that situation.

    Mat
    http://matrichardson.com/
    Workshops for 2018! http://www.matrichardson.com/workshops
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  16. #16
    Senior Member Jamgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    516
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Hi Saty

    If I was in your situation, I would not consider making the change for a 44x33 sensor because the S is so close to that level any way.
    That would leave H6D-100c and IQ3100 as my options.

    I don't know about you but the price difference between H-100c and IQ3100 is significant enough for me to go toward H-100c.
    Factor in the trade-in value for your S and I think the argument is even more compelling (excuse me for using this c word).

    Other benefits of H6D over XF:
    - Ability to use film back. So you would not need to keep your V system.
    - Ability to use polaroid back. OK - that is a bit of a stretch, but its a possibility.
    - True Focus.

    I am sure XF has some features e.g. Focus Stacking tool, that H does not offer, but then the price premium is also significant.

    Go 100MP and be content for some period of time.

    Have fun deciding
    Cheers!
    IQ3 100 • Cambo 1600 • Rodenstock 23,32,50,90 • Zeiss 350SA
    UnTroubled Land

  17. #17
    Senior Member kdphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Carmel/Tucson
    Posts
    2,355
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    If mere mortals read your post, they would literally just

    This could only happen in Dante's Inferno. You've got a pretty nice list of camera systems.

    Take two steps back----if all the camera systems can produce what your work/needs require, I'd simply choose the system that gives you the most photographic enjoyment and giggles.


    ken

    p.s. Be careful, that could also mean acquiring 3 out of four systems....
    www.houseoflandscapes.com
    www.kendoophotography.com
    www.carmelfineartprinting.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  18. #18
    Senior Member ondebanks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    518
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamgolf View Post
    Hi Saty

    If I was in your situation, I would not consider making the change for a 44x33 sensor because the S is so close to that level any way.
    That would leave H6D-100c and IQ3100 as my options.
    I'd agree with this.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamgolf View Post
    Other benefits of H6D over XF:
    - Ability to use film back. So you would not need to keep your V system.
    - Ability to use polaroid back. OK - that is a bit of a stretch, but its a possibility.
    It was such a huge and unnecessary mistake by Phase to disable film back support from the DF onwards. I will never comprehend that move. All that was ever needed to operate the AF film backs is a signal across the contact pins - the same pins shared for use for the digital backs. So why stop providing that signal?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamgolf View Post
    I am sure XF has some features e.g. Focus Stacking tool, that H does not offer, but then the price premium is also significant.
    I think the #1 feature of the XF (and Mamiya/Phase bodies in general), vs. the H line, is the focal plane shutter. You can stick any optic with > 63mm flange distance on the front. But it sounds like satybhat is happy with the existing lens choices of the S and H.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamgolf View Post
    Go 100MP and be content for some period of time.
    With 100MP 645 CMOS, I'd be contented forever.

    Ray
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    598
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Maybe I should explain a bit more.

    The o.p. uses a Leica S-006 and the 30-90 + 100f2 + 30 non-cs lenses. He also wants to print quite big, but not huge.

    Leica S lenses are amongst the finest money can buy. They are also fast for MF lenses.

    The zoom and 30mm will be difficult to replace. Pentax has a 28-45mm, bit it is wide-angle only. There is no equivalent of the 30mm in Pentax land, the 28mm was discontinued.

    In Phase/Mamiya land, the zoom is a 40-80mm, a noticeably smaller range. The 35mm is supposed to be excellent, but the 28mm has poor reputation.

    Hasselblad has a 30-90, so something comparable but it will only cover the x1.1 sensor. Further, the equivalent of the Leica 30mm in Hasselblad would be:
    -the 35mm on a full size sensor (100mpix) or
    -the 28mm on a small size sensor (50 mpix).

    I don't think the H 35mm will compare favourably to the Leica 30mm. The lens is better than its reputation, but needs to be stopped down quite a bit to be sharp all over. Conversely, the 28mm is excellent, but will not cover a full size sensor.

    Therefore, considering what is available, the equivalent of the Leica S-006 + 30-90 + 100f2 + 30 non-cs is going to be a H6D-50c, 30-90, 100f/2.2 and 28mm, if one wants to buy new.

    If one wants to buy second hand, other choices would be possible, of course.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  20. #20
    Subscriber & Workshop Member GrahamWelland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    5,800
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    564

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by ondebanks View Post

    With 100MP 645 CMOS, I'd be contented forever.

    Ray
    This is getdpi ... You'd only be content until a 200mp back came out
    Remember: adventure before dementia!

    As Oscar Wilde said, "my tastes are simple, I only like the best"
    Likes 4 Member(s) liked this post

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,310
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    I use the 006 and I printed my last exhibitions at 1mX1.5m, and the images look great at that size...sure, more resolution would mean more resolution, but you are already so far ahead of what the general public is used to seeing, even in museums and galleries, that you are splitting hairs. The Leica lenses are also excellent, so whatever other system you use will need to match or exceed their resolution, otherwise all the extra megapixels will mean nothing.

    So I would advise a separate take...rather than worrying about the specs, I would say use the camera that you most enjoy using, rather than chasing ever higher resolution. Choose the camera gets you closest to your ideal result in the quickest and most painless manner, as that is really the one to get. They really are tools, and the more comfortable and familiar you are with the tool, the better the result is going to be, especially at this level of the market...all of these cameras are so far beyond the normal that they are mostly beyond criticism from a technical standpoint, at least in the right hands!
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    598
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart Richardson View Post
    The Leica lenses are also excellent, so whatever other system you use will need to match or exceed their resolution, otherwise all the extra megapixels will mean nothing.
    That is a very good point: Leica S lenses are amongst the finest money can buy. For me, they would be the only reason to buy a Leica S. And it is not sharpness, but rendering which is outstanding.

    Hasselblad H lenses are also excellent. Technically a bit less advanced, because they are not as fast, but their rendering is also outstanding. But (there is a "but"): the rendering between them is different, so one may like it... or not.

    I am not talking about Pentax or Phase (Mamiya) lenses, because I do not know them enough.

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,310
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    I would say that from the printer's perspective, the best arbiters of quality are the lens performance and character (not just sharpness, but also distortion, fringing and other color issues) and the absolute file quality at 100%. The look of the file at 100% is more important than the actual resolution. So a fantastic 20mp will usually look better than a mediocre 36mp in almost all circumstances. This is the area with MFD and cameras like the Leica S do so well. They have a sharpness and color fidelity in their base ISO's that most 35mm digital do not achieve easily, and therefore they tend to look better irrespective of resolution.

    I would say the lenses are most important, followed very closely by absolute quality at 100%, followed by resolution in MP...all these are within limits of course! But they hold true for most modern camera systems.
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  24. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    198
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by mjr View Post
    What subjects are you shooting Saty? Commercial or for pleasure?

    To be honest, you have shot with some really fantastic kit and you're probably in a better position to offer advice than most! If you have a really clear idea of what you want to shoot and what the output will be then the options will naturally present themselves I would think.

    I decided ages ago that if I need something to work with then I would look at what I could shoot with now and go with what suited best, what might be around the corner is of no interest to me if I need to be working now. That said, with the Hasselblad not far off being in the shops then you're in a great position to try it and compare against your XF experiences.

    Bottom line is what are you missing from what you already own? What has renting kit told you about what's available now? And just as important, what do you want to shoot with?! If I was asking the same questions as you, I'd have the S 006 kit for portrait work, love it! Keep my IQ260 and Cambo just for architecture projects as it's brilliant and buy a D500 for the odd event/low light jobs, that would do everything! I have sold hundreds of prints from the S at decent sizes and have a number of 60x120cm cropped panos on my walls from single files and they look really nice, I wouldn't be worried about the S files keeping up. Have you tried the 007?

    Looking forward to hearing what you go with.

    Mat
    Thank you everyone for chiming in.
    My planned projects for the next 3 years are all Fine art landscape: I shoot less wides and more mid-tele intimate scapes. (scapes auto-corrected to scares, and my son giggled beside me).

    S006 + 100 is excellent for portraits. unbelievable, actually. I wish I had the resources for 2 systems.
    Hassy vs phase: that's where it comes down to.
    XF: has focus stacking, Hassy has Tru-focus for the quick grabs.
    Phase is just too overpriced compared to Hassy. And i think its because their spend on marketing. If they toned that down, it would translate to at least 5k less per system. But still XF is a great system. Just not sure how it compares to H5D-H6D in handling / weather sealing, etc.

    Lenses: would likely go for something wide, 50-110 zoom / 35-90 zoom or 40-80 if phase. and one tele.
    I usually travel with one or two lenses only, to allow design constraints. I feel limiting choices fuels my creativity.

    Tech cam: Love them, and will use them, but drives my family crazy. Mostly I don't venture by myself, since I don;t get much time off to allow both singular trips and family holidays. Hence holidays = shoots (fine arts). I've given up commercial this year for good, unless it comes as a blog / book sometime 5-10 years into the future.
    Website coming in a month or so.

    Just wish someone made a 6x6 digital.

  25. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    313
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by jerome_m View Post
    Conversely, the 28mm is excellent, but will not cover a full size sensor.
    Great post thanks Jerome.
    I think the cut off on the D lenses is overstated, I will find out exactly what the impact will be on the 100MP.

  26. #26
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    I'm in the camp of keeping the Leica S(006), and adding a H6-100. It truly is the best of both worlds IMHO.

    Also agree that it is all about the lenses at this level of image performance.

    So, I'd then be selective about which lenses for each kit ...knowing that you can use any of the HC/HCD lenses on the Leica with the H to S adapter. I did that for some time when I had an S2 and a H4D/60.

    In my experience the Leica S100/2 is irreplaceable ... not that the HC100/2.2 is any slouch, but the S100 is just out front of the pack in all ways you want a portrait lens to be, and the S camera's 1/4000 focal plane shutter is still a stop faster than the H6 with the new updated H LS lenses. Sounds like you already know all that.

    For example, the HC50/3.5-II is in a class of its' own ... probably the best H lenses to date ... and it sings on the S camera both for CS and FP use. It is also a nice size on the S compared to the Leica CS45 I now have, and it optically matches the S45 in most every measure except speed (2.8 verses 3.5)

    BTW, True-Focus-Absolute Position Lock (TF/APL) is more than just an auto-focus/repositioning innovation ... it also takes into account any lens focus shift and nano corrects it. Plus, you can control the H shutter delay in small increments to aid in hand held shots ... worked like a charm for me.

    IMO, Hasselblad has under-marketed many of their camera features and some of their more recent lens updates. IMO, the only Hasselblad lens to avoid is the HC-35 which is over-due for a make-over.

    - Marc
    Last edited by fotografz; 16th April 2016 at 03:28.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  27. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    313
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick-T View Post
    Great post thanks Jerome.
    I think the cut off on the D lenses is overstated, I will find out exactly what the impact will be on the 100MP.
    Apparently the crop will be the same as on the 60MP chips, not huge I don't think? You also have the option to turn off the crop.

  28. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    598
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick-T View Post
    Apparently the crop will be the same as on the 60MP chips, not huge I don't think? You also have the option to turn off the crop.
    The crop is the same because the sensor size are the same. What would bother me, however, is that it is not marked in the viewfinder, so I would not know how to really compose the final image. Otherwise, one can live with about 90 mpix instead of 100 with the 35-90, 28 and 24mm lenses.

  29. #29
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    11
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Very happy 645z user here, but if I was buying today it'd be a h6, no ifs or buts

  30. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    64
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by fotografz View Post

    ...Plus, you can control the H shutter delay in small increments to aid in hand held shots ... worked like a charm for me.... - Marc
    Can you share your setting for the shutter delay? The range is from 25 ms to 200 ms, default at 50ms. I am using 100 ms for handheld shots now on the H5D-50c after trying 25 and 50 ms, but with those I felt that that the results were less sharp due to the large mirror flap. Thanks for feedback.

  31. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,587
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by mjr View Post
    If I was spending Saty's money and I was going to do as tjv suggests and mix the S with a Hasselblad then for me it wouldn't be the 50c, it's another crop sensor and the S lenses are so good, I would have to have the 100c to give some value to the blad over the S. Just my opinion and Saty's money! Haha!

    I don't know what Saty's priorities are, for me, the only reason to add a XF or H6 to the S would be to have the option of a tech cam for architecture or landscapes, the Phase would win for me in that situation.

    Mat
    Absolutely right, if money was no object...

  32. #32
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by jvpictures View Post
    Can you share your setting for the shutter delay? The range is from 25 ms to 200 ms, default at 50ms. I am using 100 ms for handheld shots now on the H5D-50c after trying 25 and 50 ms, but with those I felt that that the results were less sharp due to the large mirror flap. Thanks for feedback.
    I guess it depends on how steady you are at hand-held work in general. I tended to use 50ms but did set 100ms on occasion. The question is whether 100ms has made a difference for you, or are all delays inadequate? It is just an aid to limit the effect of mirror impact, but it is not like "IBIS. I wish my Leica S had this shutter delay selection feature ... and I really wish it had True Focus/APL.

    - Marc

  33. #33
    Senior Member ErikKaffehr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Nyköping Sweden
    Posts
    1,191
    Post Thanks / Like

    Some reflections…

    Hi,

    Staying with Leica may make some sense. AFAIK it is a very fine camera with very fine lenses. I would not be happy with those 37 MP, though.

    But, going from 37 to MP to 50 MP is not a lot. So I don't know if going to the Pentax 645Z makes that much sense.

    I you need 100 MP than you can go with either Phase or Hassy. With Hassy the difference in price may buy you a kit of lenses.

    Do you need those 100 MP, hard to say… From what I have seen I would say that 24 MP is good enough for A2 (16" x 23"), having that as a reference you would need 96 MP for 32"x46". Viewing distance obviously plays a role.

    It used to be said that 180PPI is needed for a very good print, printing at 40x60 you would need around 80 MP for that, obviously you can assume a longer viewing distance and relax requirements quite a bit.

    It would be natural for Leica to progress to higher resolution, especially as I would suggest that higher resolution is really needed to make those fine lenses justice.

    A great advantage with the Hasselblad and Phase One backs is that you can put them on technical cameras.

    Last but not least, don't forget that subject, tripod and photographer may matter much more than lenses or sensors…

    Best regards
    Erik

    Quote Originally Posted by satybhat View Post
    Now perhaps, this actually being NOT a troll post, might not get the traction that some others recently have, but here goes, since I really need to ask the question.

    I've spent the last 4 years working with the following:

    -Leica S-006 + 30-90 + 100f2 + 30 non-cs. I'm OK with everything, save the 2x3 format. Most of my work is cropped to either 5x4 format or 1x1 square.
    -Hassy V with film backs.
    -Phase DF+ and IQ 280,
    -Recently for 2 months on 2 jobs: Phase XF + IQ3100.
    -A currently backless Alpa STC with 40HR.

    The Leica S and Hassy V I own. All other gear was borrowed / limited use rentals etc.
    I would like to have print sizes upto a metre on the short side.
    I will be getting into Digital MF 'once and for all' by the end of this year.

    My conundrum is this: Should I consider the H6D over the XF ? Hasselblad will give me a good rebate on my S-006.
    Should I consider the Pentax 645z (weather-sealed and 4x3) and sell the S006 ?
    Should I wait for the Pentax (next edition) since they have access to the sony sensor as well?

    It is interesting to note that the Hasselblad marketing until now has been way way behind the phase marketing. They never even marketed their 'True-focus'. That's illogical !!
    TBH, the excessive phase marketing is what has prompted me to ask this question in the first place.
    Any input on Hasselblad dealerships in Australia?

    Thanks for your inputs.

    Saty

  34. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,587
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Hassey has the HTS, something that can also be used on the S apparent WITH autofocus. Imagine using that with the 100c and live view. A great stopgap for a tech camera, all be it with some quality and movement compromise.

  35. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    598
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by tjv View Post
    Hassey has the HTS, something that can also be used on the S apparent WITH autofocus. Imagine using that with the 100c and live view. A great stopgap for a tech camera, all be it with some quality and movement compromise.
    The HTS includes a x1.5 converter, so the 100mm becomes a 150mm. I don't see how useful movements could be with what is a small tele.

    Of course, the HTS is very nice:
    • with the 24 and 28 mm for perspective control (e.g. interior architecture)
    • and with the 50 and 80mm for product photography (the 50 with its macro adapter being particularly good)

  36. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    198
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by jerome_m View Post
    The HTS includes a x1.5 converter, so the 100mm becomes a 150mm. I don't see how useful movements could be with what is a small tele.

    Of course, the HTS is very nice:
    • with the 24 and 28 mm for perspective control (e.g. interior architecture)
    • and with the 50 and 80mm for product photography (the 50 with its macro adapter being particularly good)
    Again, no examples of using the HTS on the internet.
    That 50 macro adapter situation is exactly what I would benefit from with my work.
    Before the MF game, I used the 24 PCE and 45 PCE on a Nikon D700 with good use.
    Hasselblad could manage SOME marketing for these things... Some youtube videos, some website videos, something?
    Jeez, even my small medical clinic gets more marketing attention than this !!
    Again, thank for the opinions, everyone.

  37. #37
    Member modator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Northern Italy
    Posts
    126
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    32

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    This is a simple shot example of what the 100mm and HTS 1,5 can do, is a test the focus is by eye without any particular precision, the focus area is tilted by 11º* so only a band marked by the grey scale is relatively on focus.
    The shot is made F3,4 (full open) it's soft , the distance between the subject is the closest possible (around 1,2 m), sometime I use this combination, anyway if the tilt or shift is not needed using the HTS like a teleconverter is performing a little worser than using TC1,7 (but you will get a 170mm) that's a little worse than an HC 150n...




    Best regards, Domenico.


    Quote Originally Posted by satybhat View Post
    Again, no examples of using the HTS on the internet.
    That 50 macro adapter situation is exactly what I would benefit from with my work.
    Before the MF game, I used the 24 PCE and 45 PCE on a Nikon D700 with good use.
    Hasselblad could manage SOME marketing for these things... Some youtube videos, some website videos, something?
    Jeez, even my small medical clinic gets more marketing attention than this !!
    Again, thank for the opinions, everyone.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  38. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    598
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by satybhat View Post
    Again, no examples of using the HTS on the internet.
    http://www.getdpi.com/forum/medium-f...hts-1-5-a.html
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  39. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    311
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by satybhat View Post
    Thank you everyone for chiming in.
    My planned projects for the next 3 years are all Fine art landscape: I shoot less wides and more mid-tele intimate scapes. (scapes auto-corrected to scares, and my son giggled beside me).
    The 645z and stacks upon stacks of money. The mid-tele's are still performing well, by those I mean the 120 Macro and 150/2.8. If THOSE aren't good enough, the Hasselblad V options surely will be. The 28-45 is best in class for a wide angle zoom, and the 55 & 90mm lenses are extremely well regarded. See the recent thread comparing the Z to a Phase back and how surprised everyone was at how well the Z performed. The Z is the only camera in this discussion that was seemingly designed with landscapes in mind. It's thoroughly a field camera. You can pixel peep or compare all you want but when it comes down to it, the Z is more than capable of stunning large prints, and it's sensor is still basically state of the art. Pentax is pretty obviously going to make a 100mp full frame body in the next year or so, and with it will come a few new lenses too. They're currently developing their middle and telephoto zooms (according to the roadmap), and if the 28-45 is any indication, this is something they know how to do very well. You will lose tech support, but film could be a suitable replacement, they still make Velvia 50 after all. The Phase and Hassy cam's really sing in the studio or a tethered and strobed environment. Outside of that, I think the advantages narrow significantly.

  40. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    216
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    some serious CA/fringing with that HTS image.
    i have retouched a fair few images shot with the HTS and that gave me a good insight as to what it could do. i immediately dismissed it as a serious option for what i shoot. i’m sure some people get on with it but i felt it brought down good lenses to merely mediocre.
    never trust the opinion of anyone who lists a load of gear in their forum signature. Dealers do not email me asking to buy your products.

  41. #41
    Senior Member stngoldberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    newport, RI
    Posts
    801
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    12

    Re: Non-troll serious MF conundrum

    I agree with Mr Smith. I sold my HTS and bought an Arca Awiss RM3DI.
    Stanley

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •