I just got back from a trip to Maine where I actively avoided bringing a digital camera (except my iPhone for fun snaps). I shot with an R4a, an M6, a Rollei 2.8E, and a Chamonix 45N-2. I shot 7 rolls of Velvia and Provia, 3 rolls of mixed C41 neg, 8 rolls of 120 400H and Ektar, and 24 sheets of 4x5 Velvia, Provia and Ektar. I got back on Saturday and I'm already scanning some of the E6. Looks pretty fantastic! I can't wait to get to doing proper wet-scans of my 4x5 film. It was my first time using ND grads and that really helped with the chromes I think.
One thing that keeps me away from shooting digital for my serious personal work is that I just have no trust in the archival-nature of a digital file. I trust pigment inkjet prints, but that's a different story. No-one is going to find a box full of .NEF files in three decades from now. When I'm old and looking back on my work, will I open up LR CC version 106 to flip through my DNGs? Obviously not. Sure there are DAM procedures that work pretty well but you have to be so "on it". Knowing that I'm human I know I will make a mistake somewhere along the lines. Baring a fire, a child, or a very angry woman my negatives are fine in their sleeves.
Then there is the joy of using the cameras. They are objectively a different experience, and it's not just nostalgia. If sailing and horseback riding were just about transportation obviously no-one would still be doing either (and people don't say "look at all those hipster sailing enthusiasts"). My Rolleiflex elicits a very different response from both myself and my subjects when shooting portraits. If you can get over the fact that your film images have grain and will never beat digital for absolute sharpness, there is a lot to love in film photography. It's funny because every Photo 101 course in the world teaches students that 'sharpness isn't everything', and yet it still seems like that's what people talk about the most. Kind of a shame, really.
To answer the OP, you can't have AF in a small 120 camera that is good for portraits. The Fuji P&S 120 cams are good for many things, but not portraits. Get an H1 or Fuji GX645 for that, but know they're big. I recommend a Rollei or a Hasselblad. They're great all-rounders, and not too big. The Rollei has a more classic look generally and the Hasselblad lenses are far more modern and contrasty. I like the Rollei look and the speed of it's operation but more people that I know that shoot 6x6 prefer the Hasselblad. (They're wrong of course.
)
Scanning really is still a problem though. Do people realize that Hasselblad has not changed the X1 or X5 scanners (which are not that different from Imacon 848 & 949s) for a decade, and the price hasn't come down AT ALL? They can't still be in production because Kodak made the CCD. Come on Hasselblad, there is no reason the X1 should cost more than an H5D-50c. For my negative 35, 120, and what pro work I do on film, I use labs that scan on Fuji Frontier SP-3000 scanners. They're great for up to about 11x14 and wedding albums. The colorists there are really good and the turn-around is great. I personally use The FIND Lab and Indie Film Lab.