Seems like this thread is more about freedom of speech than the actual camera.
But anyway, my views:
I saw the live broadcast, and actually it's the first time I've seen the CEO Perry speak (I've only read stuff earlier). As he's a man that's been working with luxury brands I've been a bit worried that the Lunacy would not be over. I see that the luxury profile is there, the camera is "Handmade in Sweden" (etched into the camera body, looks a bit silly to me, but I can live with it), and it has a special designed bag, probably expensive (haven't seen it yet). The very much try to build on the brand, they stress very much that they really make it themselves, invited the press to their factory (like Leica does) etc. So now I see how Perry's background fits in there, and I'm no longer worried that it will go the Lunacy way again. And I don't think we'll see a new Ferrari edition...
I never like it when cameras are made luxury items, but the softer level of luxury Hasselblad has now in their X1D product feels fine by me, and actually have some taste to it.
Price: it's more expensive than a Pentax, but if it had been a Leica it had costed even more, and it's of course only about 1/3 of a H6D-50c so it's aimed not only at professional photographers. I think the price is right regarding their focus group and their relative amount of luxury. And as Hassy and Phase SLRs are so extremely expensive as it is, it's actually good value regardless. Sure Pentax is better value, and a 135 camera much better still, but you don't get this type of camera to get the best price/performance.
Technical aspects of the camera:
Sensor size. 44x33/50MP was expected and I think it's a good choice. 54x41 is not reasonable for a product at this price range and the desire to make it small and light. For the long-term future it would be nice with 51x41 mirrorless, but I think that is the time when the H series will ditch the mirror. Yet a new mount could be made by then.
Shutter: leaf shutter is right for this camera, but all of us frankenstien-camera-builders are of course majorly disappointed as it will not be (easily) adaptable for TS-E lenses etc. Is it bad that they did not think more about third-party adaptation? I don't know. But I've seen the tech cam genre hammered by luke-warm to poor support from both Hasselblad and Phase One over several years, so I think they simply don't see much money in it. They could have had both of course, that would have been nice. But I simply don't know if it's worth to bother. As it is now with no FPS, it seems to me that the CFV-50c is still a better offer for tech cam use.
Lenses: they really need a wide angle, but the 30mm is coming. That's nice. I know many would like even wider... like many like even larger aperture. Personally I think the tradeoffs are tasteful and balanced. Super large aperture and ultra wide means super large heavy complex expensive. I think they've found a good balance.
User interface / ergonomics: the sweep/touch interface did not leave me with a good feeling personally, but I think this is what people want these days. It seems to have two wheels, auto-ISO and a back-button focus drive which is what I need for hand-held shooting. Oh well, the auto focus I like to know how it works. It must be at least decent, or else there will be some substantial disappointment I think. No flip-out screen, I don't miss it, but perhaps many others will, I don't really know if it was a wise design decision or not. In terms of look not having a flip-out screen is the right thing I think, flip out screen is a bit ugly/gimmicky on a camera but very handy at times...
The size -- it's great. The modest sensor size, modest aperture, and probably not having a focal plane shutter all have contributed to this. I think that the small size is a greater achievement than we may actually think. One must understand that design is about trade-offs. There's no such thing as a "no compromise design". I'm impressed with the trade-off Hasselblad has found in this design.
If it's for me? No, I'm a tech cam guy. But I think it will be for many and that it will bring Hasselblad forward, and I also think it's a great and new contribution to the medium format segment. "Game changer" is always a big word, but compared to what I've seen throughout the years from various companies when this term is used, this is one of the better times.