Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: What's the conversion ratio between 8x10, 4x5, 645 and 645 50 MP CMOS Cropped?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area, California
    Posts
    377
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    What's the conversion ratio between 8x10, 4x5, 645 and 645 50 MP CMOS Cropped?

    While selecting the lens, what conversion ratio to apply?

    For example: if an image was captured using 300mm lens in 8x10, what should be the equivalent focal length in 645 (60 - 100 MP) and 645 50 MP cropped sensor.

    Thanks,

    Subrata
    Last edited by subrata1965; 16th July 2016 at 14:12.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North Sweden
    Posts
    1,238
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: What's the conversion ratio between 8x10, 4x5, 645 and 645 50 MP CMOS Cropped?

    This is pretty handy subatra

    https://digitaltransitions.com/suppo...ualizer-tools/

    Covers all the formats, just add in the focal length you want.

    Mat

  3. #3
    Senior Member DougDolde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Joshua Tree, CA
    Posts
    347
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: What's the conversion ratio between 8x10, 4x5, 645 and 645 50 MP CMOS Cropped?


  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,538
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: What's the conversion ratio between 8x10, 4x5, 645 and 645 50 MP CMOS Cropped?

    The different ratios complicate things slightly, 5:4 for 8x10 and 4x5, 4:3 for 645 and 3:2 for 135.

    So when I compare I first think about which aspect ratio I prefer and then crop all formats accordingly (as I would have to crop them in reality). I generally prefer 4:3, so the 135 format of 36x24mm becomes 32x24mm before comparing to 645.

    Then you just need to calculate the diagonals using the Pythagorean theorem.

    The film sizes has a bit border on the film which can vary a bit so 8x10 is a tad smaller than actual 8x10. Somewhat approximate:

    8x10: 5:4 245x196mm (313mm diagonal), 4:3 245x184mm (306mm diagonal)
    645 digital: 4:3 54x41mm (67mm diagonal), 5:4 51x41mm (65mm diagonal)

    Then just divide diagonals of your prefered aspect ratio. Let's say we prefer 4:3, then the "crop factor" for 645 digital vs 8x10" film becomes 306/67 = 4.6, so a 300mm 8x10" lens correspons to a 300/4.6 = 65mm lens on 645 digital.

    You can compare apertures in the same way. f/64 on 8x10 becomes 64/4.6 = f/14 on 645.

    Note that in some cases the effective focal length differs quite much from the labeled focal length. That is wide angle lenses are usually not as wide as their labeling, and tele lenses are usually not as long. It's generally not a big issue though as you generally only need to know the approximate match. Likewise adjusting the formats like I did above is also often overkill as it doesn't make that much of a difference. It's more of a difference between 3:2 and 5:4 than 4:3 to 5:4 of course.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    541
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: What's the conversion ratio between 8x10, 4x5, 645 and 645 50 MP CMOS Cropped?

    I have trick that works for me.
    If I want to know the coverage or the angle of view for wide views like when using wide angle lenses I only consider the longer sides to do the math. If I need to know the reach like when using telephotos, I only consider the shorter sides or just use the pyth theorem.
    Try it, it may be useful to you too.
    Eduardo



    Quote Originally Posted by torger View Post
    The different ratios complicate things slightly, 5:4 for 8x10 and 4x5, 4:3 for 645 and 3:2 for 135.

    So when I compare I first think about which aspect ratio I prefer and then crop all formats accordingly (as I would have to crop them in reality). I generally prefer 4:3, so the 135 format of 36x24mm becomes 32x24mm before comparing to 645.

    Then you just need to calculate the diagonals using the Pythagorean theorem.

    The film sizes has a bit border on the film which can vary a bit so 8x10 is a tad smaller than actual 8x10. Somewhat approximate:

    8x10: 5:4 245x196mm (313mm diagonal), 4:3 245x184mm (306mm diagonal)
    645 digital: 4:3 54x41mm (67mm diagonal), 5:4 51x41mm (65mm diagonal)

    Then just divide diagonals of your prefered aspect ratio. Let's say we prefer 4:3, then the "crop factor" for 645 digital vs 8x10" film becomes 306/67 = 4.6, so a 300mm 8x10" lens correspons to a 300/4.6 = 65mm lens on 645 digital.

    You can compare apertures in the same way. f/64 on 8x10 becomes 64/4.6 = f/14 on 645.

    Note that in some cases the effective focal length differs quite much from the labeled focal length. That is wide angle lenses are usually not as wide as their labeling, and tele lenses are usually not as long. It's generally not a big issue though as you generally only need to know the approximate match. Likewise adjusting the formats like I did above is also often overkill as it doesn't make that much of a difference. It's more of a difference between 3:2 and 5:4 than 4:3 to 5:4 of course.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •