The GetDPI Photography Forum

Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!

Phase One Takes Controlling Interest of Mamiya

ptomsu

Workshop Member
Those are good points John, especially the last paragraph.

If the idiosyncratic companies cease to exist, there are less and less chances of cameras like the highly innovative Contax 645, and more recent Hy6 being developed.

My observation on this is that it'll end up being survival of the fittest. Not necessarily the best solution but one that fits the broadest spectrum of the miniscule market that MF represents. What appears to be driving this are the MF camera companies that face swift extinction if they cannot forge a digital relationship with a back maker.

The unknown wild card here is just what the 35mm companies may do in future ... who would've thought Leica would move into this segment? What if Canon and/or Sony go there? Both those companies have resources and already make their own sensors. We all know that without a significant breakthrough in sensor design, 35mm DSLRs are close to maxed out.

These companies already have a built in potential sales base by providing an upgrade path to customers they already have a dialog with. Despite apparent brand jumping, there is actually a lot of brand loyalty intact. Sony and Zeiss are already tight. A medium format camera with a good 645 sensor and all new Zeiss modern AF Zeiss lenses ... basically where the Contax 645 could have gone ... hmmmm? What then?
What then - good question.

As a owner of a Contax 645 and several lenses I was so upset by Kyocera closing down the Contax brand, that I just sold everything right after that. Thanks god!

But yes, unfortunately we do not have a real Zeiss solution in modern digital MF 645 format anymore. And this is what I am missing also! Because I love Zeiss glass, although I almost do not care about the camera or sensor or back maker, as these are pretty similar in quality (although not in price).
 

robmac

Well-known member
Since there really isn't much of one (Leica-Phase relationship) vs. the initial PR implications, I'd say none other than stiffer competition for the S2.
 

ptomsu

Workshop Member
Had the opportunity to play with a Phase One camera and a P65+ back this weekend during a local photo gear show. I must say I am kind of caught by this Phase One system. I had the H3D2 to more or less directly compare and I liked the Phase One actually more. I am NOT talking about IQ, as I did not do really comparison shots, but I am talking about the handling of camera, lenses and backs.

So my decision for which MF system to go will be a difficult one I guess - between Hasselblad and Phase One!

PS: I had also the chance to talk to the Leica representatives - they did not have an S2 for demo - and they still could not say anything above what we all already know. And it will be available from October 2009 - com on folks, as we all know it will become January 2010 then.
 
Top