Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
You're going to have to make the trip sometime and share which sports car----we'll make a great photo shoot with our lowly IQ3 100 "entry level" cameras! :ROTFL:Unfortunately Doug has myopic vision that doesn't seem to see beyond his Nikon. Yup, definitely myopic.
Btw, nobody doubts the qualities of the D850 (arguably the best DSLR on the planet these days) BUT there are a lot of folks who really don't care. Not a bit. In fact, they tire of hearing about Doug's Nikon choice again, and again, and again, and again ... just saying.
As regards the new IQ4 series. Well, I'm impressed. I'm not sure that it'll stop me from buying a new sports car (this is the discretionary purchase I'm looking at again this year) but I'm certainly looking forward to seeing how well it performs, plus secretly hoping some IQ260 or IQ3100 achromatic owners sell in order to get the new beasts.
Graham, you don't have to wait to get a IQ260 Achromatic , just hit the Buy It Now button :salute:secretly hoping some IQ260 or IQ3100 achromatic owners sell in order to get the new beasts.
The main market? Institutional clients like museums. Perhaps aerial applications. It used to include wealthy enthusiasts and a small population of fine art photographers who may or may not be wealthy but print large and have the print sales to justify the cost and the ever diminishing returns from a 150 mp back. My sense is that the latter group is severely contracting, because (a) there are other options out there now like the X1D and the GFX, (b) the cost is NOT a one time cost but it's part of a nonstop merry go round of marginal upgrades, (c) they want smaller and lighter, and the Phase XF and the BR lenses are anything but, and (d) you can pick up a used IQ100 at a great price. All in all, it's a pretty tenuous market niche to tie your business to.So basically the US national average yearly income to put down for one of these (no camera/lens included) so really a rich plaything or for a professional photographer a large capital investment that needs to pay for itself over 3-5 years, you have to weigh up the added value for your clients and if they will even see the ‘added value’. for me it’s simple.
Will i get any more paying clients buying this camera to offset the cost and then make more money? in short no, the money is better spent on marketing, lenses and something that shoots 4k at 60p.
the market must be shrinking for phase backs, my admittedly small pool for reference of phase owners (half a dozen car/advertising photographers) no longer own or use them.
where is the main market place for Phase now?
The main market? Institutional clients like museums. Perhaps aerial applications. It used to include wealthy enthusiasts and a small population of fine art photographers who may or may not be wealthy but print large and have the print sales to justify the cost and the ever diminishing returns from a 150 mp back. My sense is that the latter group is severely contracting, because (a) there are other options out there now like the X1D and the GFX, (b) the cost is NOT a one time cost but it's part of a nonstop merry go round of marginal upgrades, and (c) they want smaller and lighter, and the Phase XF and the BR lenses are anything but. All in all, that's a pretty tenuous market niche to tie your business to.So basically the US national average yearly income to put down for one of these (no camera/lens included) so really a rich plaything or for a professional photographer a large capital investment that needs to pay for itself over 3-5 years, you have to weigh up the added value for your clients and if they will even see the added value. for me its simple.
Will i get any more paying clients buying this camera to offset the cost and then make more money? in short no, the money is better spent on marketing, lenses and something that shoots 4k at 60p.
the market must be shrinking for phase backs, my admittedly small pool for reference of phase owners (half a dozen car/advertising photographers) no longer own or use them.
where is the main market place for Phase now?
Do you mean that your profits INCREASE by the cost of a new IQ4 150 compared to your profits with your IQ 100? Or, your business makes enough money for you to be able to afford it? Two very different ways to approach it. A business does not decide to buy equipment just because it can afford to do so. That's what wealthy people with disposable income do with their hobbies. A business approaches it based upon return on investment. I gather there are precious few professional photographers out there today who feel that their business increases its overall profitability by buying a 150 mp back, particularly if they already have a 100 mp back.A Camera I buy has to finance itself in 18months. If it wouldn’t I wouldn’t buy it. And that applies to Phase Fuji and all other cameras I ever owned.
Do you mean that your profits INCREASE by the cost of a new IQ4 150 compared to your profits with your IQ 100? Or, your business makes enough money for you to be able to afford it? Two very different ways to approach it. A business does not decide to buy equipment just because it can afford to do so. That's what wealthy people with disposable income do with their hobbies. A business approaches it based upon return on investment. I gather there are precious few professional photographers out there today who feel that their business increases its overall profitability by buying a 150 mp back, particularly if they already have a 100 mp back.
Care to share how you increase your profits by more than the cost of the IQ4 150 when you already have a fully paid up IQ 100?Both. It has not to effect the business in any way and it has to increase profits. Otherwise there is no sense in buying it.
Another very important is how much fun it makes To work with a camera. It certainly isn’t important for the business, but for me.
Matt, how do you define R8? Surely there's room for one of these in the big city. LOL!If only I worked from a tripod... I know. I should. OTOH, 60th birthday just around the corner, and no room for an R8 (damn city living)...
Well, enjoy!, o ye partakers in either sports cars or 100+MP backs. I look forward to ... internet sized versions of your glorious works ... this system has some flaws.. (no sarcasm at all - I realize it could sound that way)
Matt
My guess is that if you wait a few years, they will close their doors. Their market is shrinking by the year. They got pushed out of the 33x44 market, Hasselblad market and they're not in the portable, mirrorless market. At best, they will wind up being a software company if they open up C1 to include all cameras. Otherwise, this may very well be the last release.So Phase have closed the system?
I guess Leica is worldwide known as a luxury brand, even from people who are notLeica seem to do ok in a luxury/exclusive/high end market and they don't have a successful software company in their portfolio so i wouldn’t write off P1 just yet.