...
Some of the V lenses work OK and even quite well on digital especially up to 50MP. But after that, 60MP and above, ...
Perhaps that's why Hasselblad has stuck with 50 Mpixel for the CFV50c II.
Remember that that is what we're talking about in this thread...
If I buy one of these, I know with absolute certainty that any higher resolution is irrelevant for me. 50mPixel is way more than I need for my photography, it's one of the reasons I can look at the CFV50c II and easily consider it a 39 Mpixel square format back. Heck, I'm having a ball with the Leica CL + Voigtländer 10mm lens, cropping square to simulate an SWC look.
Of course, considering it a square format 33x33 format back, I have no need for back rotation. Nor did I find any difficulty whatever in focusing my 500CM with Acute Matte screen, with the lenses I have, using the previous CFV50c when I tested one. I tested with the WLF and with the 45° prism finder.
Different priorities, I guess. I have no idea why I'd ever need a 100 Mpixel digital camera; I don't make prints large enough to really need more than 16 to 24 and have happily made large prints (for me) with 5. Super high resolution like that seems to be irrelevant to my photographic subject matter.
G