Are you really unable to discern the difference between an analysis of potential market implications of Hasselblad’s public messaging and invective?
We are in a strange time, where people apparently have no interest or ability to understand logic, fact and context. They look for something to get outraged about, and react to the narrative they have created in their heads about whatever triggers them.
For example, reread the post where you wrote:
“Don't you actually think all these silly posts are extremely funny, the ones predicting financial trouble and demise of Hasselblad (or Leica, Olympus, Pentax, Nikon, ........ you name the company, there aren't many that do not belong on this list) and still these companies stay in business, develop new models and sell them. These doom-posters might get it right one day, but in my mind purely by coincidence ”
Hasselblad has been in financial trouble for many years. They have been bought and sold multiple times.
They sold Hasselblad-branded Sony cameras, for a little while, which seems dilutive to a prestige brand.
They opened then closed a design center.
They have had turnover in upper management. Peter Oosting, who was responsible for guiding the company out of deep waters, resigned unexpectedly in 2017.
They are operating in a shrinking, highly-competitive market. They have delayed and/or canceled multiple products.
They defaulted on their debt obligations and are now owned by a Chinese drone company, which may save the Hasselblad brand, though the future is far from certain.
Presumably the patent images have quelled the notion that the story of DJI’s ownership is fake news.
Somehow, you interpret the mentioning of these historical facts as a silly prediction about the future. It seems you are unable to reconcile that the Hasselblad of today isn’t the same as the Hasselblad of twenty plus years ago. You ignore reality and create a story in your head that people are unfairly attacking Hasselblad. You then respond to the story you have created.
This approach has gained traction in politics, as well.
It’s sad that this is where we are.