Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Love this!:thumbup:
Pentax 67II + SMC 100/4 M + Fuji RVP
Fuji X-Pro3 + Zeiss Touit 50/2.8
Wow! Amazing image!:thumbs:Palatine Hill, Rome, 1991, Pentax 645, Agfa XRS 100, Epson 700, Viewscan
View attachment 147021
It's a plant for processing of chicken byproducts. It's installed next to a poultry dressing plant. The feet, heads, intestines, much of the bones etc. is the input for this plant. The output is chicken (bone and meat) meal which is used as an ingredient for animal feed. The plant has an input capacity of 15 tons per hour and will be commissioned the coming week before official handover to the customer. My day job is selling plants like this to the meat and fish processing industries. They are available for more or less any animal or fish byproducts.Now Jorgen
Please tell us , what kind of industrial facility is this .
Lovely story and image, Bill.Last week I took my Rollei 2.8F off its display shelf, loaded a roll of Tri X and went for a walk. The camera is 60 years old; I've owned it for about 20 years but never used it. I grew up with Rollei TLRs in my university days but could never afford the flagship, and I bought this one in a fit of nostalgia - and never regretted it. It is a mechanical masterpiece. As fas I know it's never been serviced and its only fault is that the 1/2 and 1 second speeds are too long. I guess we all get stiff with age.
This is one of the 12 shots I took. They all came out quite well though Tri X was not the right film for a sunny snowy day! I had to use 1/500th (which probably is slower than that) at F16 and the negatives are still a bit dense. Developed in DF96 then copied with my XF and processed in C1.
:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:Last week I took my Rollei 2.8F off its display shelf, loaded a roll of Tri X and went for a walk. The camera is 60 years old; I've owned it for about 20 years but never used it. I grew up with Rollei TLRs in my university days but could never afford the flagship, and I bought this one in a fit of nostalgia - and never regretted it. It is a mechanical masterpiece. As fas I know it's never been serviced and its only fault is that the 1/2 and 1 second speeds are too long. I guess we all get stiff with age.
This is one of the 12 shots I took. They all came out quite well though Tri X was not the right film for a sunny snowy day! I had to use 1/500th (which probably is slower than that) at F16 and the negatives are still a bit dense. Developed in DF96 then copied with my XF and processed in C1.