Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Help with minimum size tripod need please

  1. #1
    Senior Member Greg Haag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Jonesboro, Arkansas
    Posts
    300
    Post Thanks / Like

    Help with minimum size tripod need please

    I have a few longer hikes (for me) this year, and I am looking at my options to lighten my load for those. One possible area is tripods and tripod heads. I currently have a regular and lightweight setup (pictured below), my regular setup weighs 6.65lbs and my lightweight setup weighs 3.17lbs. I have never used my lightweight setup with my technical camera in anything other than ideal conditions, and was hoping to get some feedback on whether or not it is too lightweight to rely on in the field. Also, if it is too lightweight, is there a good alternative.
    Thanks in advance,
    Greg

    Gear in use
    Phase One IQ4 150 back
    Cambo WRS 1600
    Rodenstock 32HR, 90HR & 180HR

    Combined weight of the back, Cambo and lens approximately 7lbs

    Heres a link to the small tripod, it a Gitzo Travler Series 1
    https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produ..._ser_1_5s.html

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	tripods-1.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	365.9 KB 
ID:	146577

  2. #2
    Subscriber and Workshop Member MGrayson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    2,320
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4

    Re: Help with minimum size tripod need please

    Greg,

    After playing with one at PhotoPlus, I picked up a RRS TQC-14, which has a center column. I ordered the TFC spider to convert it into a TFC-14 without the center column. With a BH-30 ball head, the total is about 3 lbs. I have lighter tripods, but this setup is quite rigid, and is my "take anywhere except I don't thanks to IBIS" tripod

    I haven't tried a light Gitzo in a long time, so can't offer a comparison.

    Matt
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  3. #3
    Member Mexecutioner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    180
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Help with minimum size tripod need please

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Haag View Post
    I have a few longer hikes (for me) this year, and I am looking at my options to lighten my load for those. One possible area is tripods and tripod heads. I currently have a regular and lightweight setup (pictured below), my regular setup weighs 6.65lbs and my lightweight setup weighs 3.17lbs. I have never used my lightweight setup with my technical camera in anything other than ideal conditions, and was hoping to get some feedback on whether or not it is too lightweight to rely on in the field. Also, if it is too lightweight, is there a good alternative.
    Thanks in advance,
    Greg

    Gear in use
    Phase One IQ4 150 back
    Cambo WRS 1600
    Rodenstock 32HR, 90HR & 180HR

    Combined weight of the back, Cambo and lens approximately 7lbs

    Heres a link to the small tripod, it a Gitzo Travler Series 1
    https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produ..._ser_1_5s.html

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	tripods-1.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	365.9 KB 
ID:	146577
    Hi Greg,

    I used to have two of those traveler tripods, they were great, but, IMHO, not sturdy enough for the IQ4150 and XF so I ditched them. I don't want to carry my Gitzo giant everywhere so I decided to build a new travel tripod and after some research opted for a Gitzo 4553. Light enough and way sturdier than the travelers.

    What I like the best is that is that it is 18.9" collapsed so it fits in my carry-on bag with the head detached (added an Arca Swiss quick-Link on top)

    I replaced the Gitzo spider with a Markins TH-230 hub and that saved even more weight; half a pound if not a bit more and it also takes much less space when folded since the diameter is smaller on top.

    I also replaced the feet with some titanium spike ones, but that I think is inconsequential when it comes to size and weight. I can put it on the scale and give you a weight total, without a head mounted.

    Overall I am happy with this solution for traveling / hiking. I hope this gives you some good ideas.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  4. #4
    Senior Member Greg Haag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Jonesboro, Arkansas
    Posts
    300
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Help with minimum size tripod need please

    That sound interesting, I will take a look!

    Quote Originally Posted by Mexecutioner View Post
    Hi Greg,

    I used to have two of those traveler tripods, they were great, but, IMHO, not sturdy enough for the IQ4150 and XF so I ditched them. I don't want to carry my Gitzo giant everywhere so I decided to build a new travel tripod and after some research opted for a Gitzo 4553. Light enough and way sturdier than the travelers.

    What I like the best is that is that it is 18.9" collapsed so it fits in my carry-on bag with the head detached (added an Arca Swiss quick-Link on top)

    I replaced the Gitzo spider with a Markins TH-230 hub and that saved even more weight; half a pound if not a bit more and it also takes much less space when folded since the diameter is smaller on top.

    I also replaced the feet with some titanium spike ones, but that I think is inconsequential when it comes to size and weight. I can put it on the scale and give you a weight total, without a head mounted.

    Overall I am happy with this solution for traveling / hiking. I hope this gives you some good ideas.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Eads, Tennessee
    Posts
    1,503
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Help with minimum size tripod need please

    Greg..... I have the traveler and as much as I like the weight its not rigid enough for your equipment. I also have the RRS 14 series tripod (4 section) and it is noticeably more rigid and tests that way at The Center Column (https://thecentercolumn.com/).

    You may even want to consider the 23/24 series which weighs just a little more but for me the 14 works out really well with my Actus/Sony/Phase stuff which has similar weights to what you are dealing with.

    I go back and forth with a P0 or 60 leveler for the tripod head. Both work out well....

    Victor
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  6. #6
    Senior Member Greg Haag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Jonesboro, Arkansas
    Posts
    300
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Help with minimum size tripod need please

    Quote Originally Posted by vjbelle View Post
    Greg..... I have the traveler and as much as I like the weight its not rigid enough for your equipment. I also have the RRS 14 series tripod (4 section) and it is noticeably more rigid and tests that way at The Center Column (https://thecentercolumn.com/).

    You may even want to consider the 23/24 series which weighs just a little more but for me the 14 works out really well with my Actus/Sony/Phase stuff which has similar weights to what you are dealing with.

    I go back and forth with a P0 or 60 leveler for the tripod head. Both work out well....

    Victor
    Thank you Victor, I hope you have a great trip out west!

  7. #7
    Senior Member darr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,335
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Help with minimum size tripod need please

    Hi Greg,

    I use the RRS TVC-23 + RRS-BH40 head and also the RRS TVC 14 + RRS BH30 head, both have a quick column that I seldom use. I have comfortably used the TVC 23 with my ALPA Max and heavier Linhof Master Technika 3000 with a hefy 6x17 magazine attached. The TVC-23 is an excellent tripod for these cameras and I have used it for over five years. What you lose in folded size with the TVC 23, I feel I easily make up for in strength and weight.

    The TVC 14 I use with my ALPA SWA, Mamiya 6, Hasselblad 501CM and Fuji mirrorless APC cameras. While I enjoy the small size and convenience of the TVC 14, I do not enjoy the BH30 head and will replace it at some point in the future. I would never use the TVC 14 with my Linhof because it would be pushing its limitations IMO, but I have used it with the Max in the past. Hope this helps somewhat. Do look at the TVC 23 as I think it does not get enough attention and it is a lightweight and strong tripod worthy of consideration.

    Kind regards,
    Darr
    Website: photoscapes.com
    Photo Blog: darrlene.com
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  8. #8
    Senior Member Greg Haag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Jonesboro, Arkansas
    Posts
    300
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Help with minimum size tripod need please

    Quote Originally Posted by darr View Post
    Hi Greg,

    I use the RRS TVC-23 + RRS-BH40 head and also the RRS TVC 14 + RRS BH30 head, both have a quick column that I seldom use. I have comfortably used the TVC 23 with my ALPA Max and heavier Linhof Master Technika 3000 with a hefy 6x17 magazine attached. The TVC-23 is an excellent tripod for these cameras and I have used it for over five years. What you lose in folded size with the TVC 23, I feel I easily make up for in strength and weight.

    The TVC 14 I use with my ALPA SWA, Mamiya 6, Hasselblad 501CM and Fuji mirrorless APC cameras. While I enjoy the small size and convenience of the TVC 14, I do not enjoy the BH30 head and will replace it at some point in the future. I would never use the TVC 14 with my Linhof because it would be pushing its limitations IMO, but I have used it with the Max in the past. Hope this helps somewhat. Do look at the TVC 23 as I think it does not get enough attention and it is a lightweight and strong tripod worthy of consideration.

    Kind regards,
    Darr
    Thank you Darr, I will take a look at the 23!
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  9. #9
    Member Mexecutioner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    180
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Help with minimum size tripod need please

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Haag View Post
    That sound interesting, I will take a look!
    Greg,

    Here are some images of it, including one inside an international sized carry-on bag for reference.

    Weight, as shown, is 2002 grams / 4.41lbs.

    Name:  001.jpg
Views: 144
Size:  868.3 KBName:  002.jpg
Views: 144
Size:  744.7 KBName:  003.jpg
Views: 143
Size:  607.9 KB
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  10. #10
    Senior Member Greg Haag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Jonesboro, Arkansas
    Posts
    300
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Help with minimum size tripod need please

    Quote Originally Posted by Mexecutioner View Post
    Greg,

    Here are some images of it, including one inside an international sized carry-on bag for reference.

    Weight, as shown, is 2002 grams / 4.41lbs.

    Name:  001.jpg
Views: 144
Size:  868.3 KBName:  002.jpg
Views: 144
Size:  744.7 KBName:  003.jpg
Views: 143
Size:  607.9 KB

    NICE, I love how compact it is!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •