The GetDPI Photography Forum

Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!

The New and Improved Fun with Nikon Images!

m_driscoll

New member
Trying out the new 70-200 with the new TC-20E III. The third photo is an extreme crop of the second one. Thanks for looking. Cheers, Matt

1. D3s; 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II w/TC-20E III; 400mm; 1/200s @ f/5.6; ISO 800


2. D3s; 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II w/TC-20E III; 400mm; 1/250s @ f/5.6; ISO 800


3. D3s; 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II w/TC-20E III; 400mm; 1/250s @ f/5.6; ISO 800


4. D3s; 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II w/TC-20E III; 400mm; 1/1600s @ f/5.6; ISO 800


5. D3s; 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II w/TC-20E III; 400mm; 1/3200s @ f/5.6; ISO 800


6. D3s; 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II w/TC-20E III; 400mm; 1/500s @ f/5.6; ISO 800


http://mdriscoll.zenfolio.com
 

shtarka1

Active member
Vlad, very nice shot with slight HDR effect!

Matt, the converter is sweet paired up with the 70-200vr2! Last one has some interesting bokeh...
 
T

tetsrfun

Guest
Trying out the new 70-200 with the new TC-20E III.
*******
What is your initial impression of this combination? Esp. change in image quality and focusing speed/accuracy compared to "bare" 70-200.

Steve
 

m_driscoll

New member
Vlad, very nice shot with slight HDR effect!
Matt, the converter is sweet paired up with the 70-200vr2! Last one has some interesting bokeh...
Trying out the new 70-200 with the new TC-20E III.
*******
What is your initial impression of this combination? Esp. change in image quality and focusing speed/accuracy compared to "bare" 70-200.
Steve
Matt: seems a nice pair. But as Steve mentions some strange bokeh there pal!
Good color though!
Regards.
Gentlemen: All and all, i think that it's pretty good. Didn't notice any focusing issues and for 400m, the IQ's OK. Not as good as a 200-400mm or a 400mm, but OK, and a lot lighter (and less expensive). Probably a reasonable option if you're not a real wildlife shooter. Needs some more photos taken.

I just figured out the "strange bokeh"! I was shooting through some branches that were relatively close to me.

Cheers, Matt

http://mdriscoll.zenfolio.com
 

TRSmith

Subscriber Member
A few details from this morning's trip to an old church nearby.

Pretty rump-worn!


Still plays!


From the outside through a thick sheet of plastic to a stained glass window.
 
T

tetsrfun

Guest
Gentlemen: All and all, i think that it's pretty good. Didn't notice any focusing issues and for 400m, the IQ's OK. Not as good as a 200-400mm or a 400mm, but OK, and a lot lighter (and less expensive). Probably a reasonable option if you're not a real wildlife shooter.
*******
Thanks...with that recommendation, I went to the local camera and bought one. :>)

Steve
 
T

tetsrfun

Guest
Well it's dark outside so I taped a home printed target on the wall and shot with available light. 70-200 VRII + 20E III...1/60 f/5.6 400mm. Hand-held and tripod. I am impressed with this combination. (They are somewhat sharper prior to jpg conversion)

Steve
 
Last edited:
Top