Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Thank you Joel. The print turned out quite nice.Frederick, that's a wonderful picture. I bet it will print nicely especially if you can get some good cloud detail. Also, using a telephoto for landscape is a favorite technique of mine and is not used very often. I really like the perspective.
Thanks for sharing,
Joel
I agree both photo's are very different, but I wonder if we're really looking at the differences between the sensors or at the difference in PP (or in-camera processing).Fascinating, and amazing, difference in how the d850 and digital back have rendered the subject;......the DB is obviously vastly better at the upper tones and, one suspects, colour reality. The d850 looks like it has artificially made acutance by comparison.
..........a graphic illustration of why universities and art galleries use DB's for reproducing important art works.
Both, actually... I don't really like these images, and the red hydrangea I shot as well, was very different than the blue one here. The colors and textures were a challenge and I did not succeed. The only reason for posting these was the "Fun" part of the thread title, learning a little more. Btw, the raw files showed the differences right away.I agree both photo's are very different, but I wonder if we're really looking at the differences between the sensors or at the difference in PP (or in-camera processing).
My guess would be that if we would start with an unaltered raw file from both cameras we can make them both look much more similar with a modest effort on both (certainly at the small size for web presentation)
Haha, thanks so much for answering my next post with an inquiry about a good lens for the D3100. I would enjoy the much better 3300 but that can wait.I got my first post wrong in that I mistook d3100(aps-c?) with a digital back (3100)....in view of that the aps-c has done brilliantly on the flower pic, in my view, as tonal range is(apparently) much superior.
My wife recently aquired a new nikon d3300 for a very good price as it was 'old stock' due to the d3400 & now d3500. These are nikon's cheapest and most important models....the d3300 is arguably the best entry dslr that nikon has ever mad as the later two have been purposely crippled by nikon presumably to enhance the range further up.
The d3300 came with 18-55 AF-P lens which is quite staggering in both optical quality and speed of focus(silent) You can see this lens on ebay for not very many pennies in unused condition where buyers of the kit don't need it.
I have noticed that there is a AF-P wideangle zoom in 10-20 that is not expensive, light-weight and highly rated by reviewers.....
The d3300 kit is an amazingly high quality item for not very much money and makes super images ....it's the reeason that I'm here looking at the nikon pages every day!
Post away! This is Fun with Nikon Images...I think the d3100 will handle the AF-P lenses but it might be prudent to check first as nikon has be playing fast and dirty with lens compatability lately........
I have been tempted to post some pix from d3300 but only have 'snaps' and it's a bit 'down market' for these elevated pages!
Hmmm... just noticed this. Step by step... what did you do and what is happening?I'm obviously doing something wrong as I have failed several times to load files onto the site.....:banghead: