Site Sponsors
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 51 to 100 of 100

Thread: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

  1. #51
    Subscriber & Workshop Member GrahamWelland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    5,802
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    564

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Also helps not being stuck at one end or the other with a pair of zooms.
    Remember: adventure before dementia!

    As Oscar Wilde said, "my tastes are simple, I only like the best"

  2. #52
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    My kit may wind up something like this . It's actually 2 kits

    Zeiss, 18,25,50 1.4, 100 macro

    Second kit 24-70,85 1.4 g, 200 f2 and tele for it. All Nikon this kit more commercial work and Zeiss more landscape.

    Option lenses Nikon 17t/s I'm counting on this being released, 45 PCE and 85 PCE
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  3. #53
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    A bit north of Copenhagen
    Posts
    1,522
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    569

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm


    It seems like you all are tilting towards a 18 Zeiss instead of the 21.
    Well I must admit I do have a week spot for going wide, allthough my wife are getting sea-sick looking at the tilted wide-picture. Its also more handy and cheaper. A used R19 is rather expensive, and then shaving and so.
    Hhhhmmmm, perhaps I should borrough a 18 and give it a try, allthough it was not in that direction my going-simpel-project was ment to go. But walking round and doing fast streetshots with a 800E, even with a 18 sounds like an impossibole project because of the shallow DOF, that don't exist, but very much look like it do. Yes could be fun to se if presetting at 8 or 11 and 2m's (7ft.) distance could make it a street camera, and perhaps a 25mm later on. hhmm.
    Thorkil

  4. #54
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Now in regards to the 21 which I had years ago on my canons. It's a very sharp lens but the distortion is hard to correct and even the 18 is not standard distortion but has some wave in it but PT lens plugin works really nice and easy with it to correct. The 21mm is not wide enough nor tight enough for me. I like the 18 and 24 focal lengths better since I like a 35 focal length. Again like any system you need to base it on some standard lens. A lot of folks this maybe a 50mm lens than the would go 21,28,50 and say 100 as this is nice gapping between lenses. Now if your a base 35mm lens shooter than no doubt you go 24 and 85 on either side but a 21 is too close so the next best in gapping is a 17/18 lens.

    I'm a base 35mm shooter so for me my gapping is perfect 18,25,35,85. Now I do have that overlap 501.8 lens too in the mix. The 50 is nice to have but I prefer 35mm as that standard focal length.

    Now this gapping method has been around forever and as a prime shooter makes great sense. Now we have zooms and obviously that will create some overlap which lets say having two 35mm focal lengths is okay but having 24 and 35 maybe redundant. So again you have to watch yourself unless you are making kits for very specific shooting. This is something I am working on so I may run into some redundancy as well. I'm just not the biggest zoom fan and try to avoid them. Unless I will use it for specific type shooting for example PR , grip and grin stuff a 24-70 is a sweetie. I jumped slightly off topic but part of my point here as well is you need to decide are you a zoom guy or a prime guy. They don't mix very well at a bar. LOL

    I know the 14-24 seems like your getting 4 focal lengths and you are but your also gaining weight , size and harder handling too. There are trade offs
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  5. #55
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,911
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    ...you need to decide are you a zoom guy or a prime guy.
    Two quick, and probably obvious, points to add to the conversation. With 36 megapixels at our disposal, we can "extract" images from within images and carry fewer lenses. Unless you really need all the pixels, cropping is a tool that can turn an 18mm prime into an 18-35mm "virtual zoom".

    Second, I frequently use Lightroom to filter my catalog by camera, lens and focal length to see how I'm using my kit. For example, I found that I used the 70-200mm zoom primarily at 200mm (by 6:1 over the second most used focal length) and the 17-35mm at 17mm (by 2:1 over the second most used focal length). By the way, the second most used focal length for the 17-35mm zoom was 35mm.

    While I own and love the Zeiss 21mm, you guys have me lusting for the Zeiss 18mm. Damn you!
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography

  6. #56
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Here's an example of a shot I could not have gotten with the 21, simply no room behind me to back up without getting run over in a busy street. ZF 18.2 hand-held at f8. (The building is called the "Turning Torso" building in Malmo, Sweden.) :



    Unfortunately, I doubt the 17-35 would have fared better because the extreme edges are pretty unusable and this image extends into that lens' bad areas at both ends, but this lens holds it together pretty darn well. I like Joe's reminder about crop-ability with 36MP; even if we have to shoot a little loose, cropping to a 21 FOV is still leaving us like 28MP:



    And a center crop for comparison, but not really enough fine detail to see how sharp it actually is, but at least you get an idea:



    Note: After reviewing several ZF18 shots from my recent trip, I will be keeping it and probably not bother on the 17-35 zoom as I do have the 24-120 as well, and find it quite acceptable from 24 up
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  7. #57
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,911
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Here's an example of a shot I could not have gotten with the 21, simply no room behind me to back up without getting run over in a busy street. ZF 18.2 hand-held at f8. (The building is called the "Turning Torso" building in Malmo, Sweden.)
    Jack,

    And now I'll become the "turning torso" when I buy the Zeiss 18mm and my wife says, "Another lens?!"

    Joe
    Last edited by Joe Colson; 21st August 2012 at 07:11.
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography

  8. #58
    Subscriber & Workshop Member GrahamWelland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    5,802
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    564

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Colson View Post
    .

    While I own and love the Zeiss 21mm, you guys have me lusting for the Zeiss 18mm. Damn you!
    joe,

    Don't listen, just get the 15mm
    Remember: adventure before dementia!

    As Oscar Wilde said, "my tastes are simple, I only like the best"

  9. #59
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by GrahamWelland View Post
    joe,

    Don't listen, just get the 15mm


    Seriously, the 15 is STELLAR, very sharp and simpler "mostly barrel" distortion to deal with. However it is easily 2x the volumetric size and most of that is in the front lens group, and then has to be close to 2x the weight of the 18. As good as it is, I know I'd never be carrying it when I needed it. By contrast the 18 tucks into a corner compartment really easily.
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  10. #60
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    A bit north of Copenhagen
    Posts
    1,522
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    569

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Guy: On my M6 the 21 Elmarit was allways on, the 50 and the 90 summicron's didn't touch the camera.
    On the D3 most pictures with the 14-24mm were at 14mm. But I also grew a little tired of this ultra-wide. My hasselblads, I used the SWC allmost all the time(around 20-21mm I guess) and some few times the 201F with the 50mm(what a stellar view through the PM51 viewer!), allmost never the 110mm.
    So I guess I ought to be a 21mm shooter, but these days a 18mm might be the headline instead, a then later on a 25mm or a 28mm. But being an architect 18mm would be the most used at work. and 25mm perhaps for street etc. (if I'm not going simple and sell all the DSLR's and buy me a M9 or just the PD1M and GRD and...............).
    Jack, just a little correction , its called "turning torso"(and we look at it walking at the coastline here in Copenhagen). If you just had made a hint I could have provided you with adresses on old and interesting café's in the old town of Copenhagen also some wierd ones, where the 18mm would have been doing very well. Next time you'll have to ask . A lot of wonderfull places in innner Copenhagen, but I only seldom go there, and thats a shame.
    That picture is just splendid!, and I couldn't ask for more sharpnes-wise! And clean and well-defined at the edges too!
    Does the lens-correction in C1, after analysing, do the distortion-correction?
    Best
    Thorkil

  11. #61
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,674
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Jack Wrote >>>"Note: After reviewing several ZF18 shots from my recent trip, I will be keeping it and probably not bother on the 17-35 zoom as I do have the 24-120 as well, and find it quite acceptable from 24 up>>>

    No doubt the Zeiss 18mm is head and shoulders above the Nikon 17-35 f2.8 when set at 18mm, especially towards the corners...even if the zoom is well stopped down. With that said, where the zoom does well is in a compact travel kit when it's paried with a relatively small telezoom such as the Tamron 70-300 VC lens which is amazingly good on the D800 and far superior to Nikon's own version. A small 50mm G lens can be thrown into the mix if desired. This gives an relatively light weight 17-300mm kit that perfoms well save for that relatively small amount of corner deterioration between 17-22mm with the 17-35mm zoom.

    Jack, really nice image of the turning torso building and one of a number of favorites of mine that you've posted from your recent/current trip.

    Dave (D&A)
    Last edited by D&A; 21st August 2012 at 06:09.

  12. #62
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Thorkil, thank you! And next time I will for sure tag you ahead of time and get some tips. This trip came up quickly and I was not even sure I'd have a lot of free time to shoot.

    Dave, thank you too!

    Oh, and name has been corrected -- thanks
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  13. #63
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Little Rock AR
    Posts
    1,927
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Jack,

    With the 18mm, did you have any harsh flare issues? There have been some reports of flaring on the 18mm that is very hard to remove, mainly due to the shape and size of the flare.

    Thanks
    Paul

  14. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    760
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    I have seen flare on occasion with this lens but nothing like what i have seen with the 14-24mm. I think flare is inherent in such ultra wide angle lenses.

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul2660 View Post
    Jack,

    With the 18mm, did you have any harsh flare issues? There have been some reports of flaring on the 18mm that is very hard to remove, mainly due to the shape and size of the flare.

    Thanks
    Paul

  15. #65
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    A bit north of Copenhagen
    Posts
    1,522
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    569

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Could one ask all for more 18mm Zeiss pictures ?
    Thorkil

  16. #66
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul2660 View Post
    Jack,

    With the 18mm, did you have any harsh flare issues? There have been some reports of flaring on the 18mm that is very hard to remove, mainly due to the shape and size of the flare.

    Thanks
    Paul
    Hi Paul,

    No, I have not seen any excessive flare -- in fact, shooting into bright light, I have not really even seen any notable ghosting. I have not shot it directly into the Sun, but the Sun behind a cloud is in fact being reflected by windows in the building shot above and it's handling that perfectly...
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  17. #67
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Beach Haven, NJ
    Posts
    685
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by Thorkil View Post
    Could one ask all for more 18mm Zeiss pictures ?
    Thorkil
    Here are two taken with the Zeiss ZF.2, hand held, about f10 on a D800E.
    Regards to all
    Dave in NJ
    Last edited by gurtch; 5th September 2013 at 08:18.
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  18. #68
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Geez Dave every time I see your images it brings me back to my youth and the New Jersey coast. I was a Seaside Heights and Beach Haven teenager during the whole summer breaks We had a house in Ortley beach but we sold it when I was about 14 so I was more about girls than photography back than. LOL

    Yes " under the board walk " was my theme song. ROTFLMAO
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  19. #69
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Beach Haven, NJ
    Posts
    685
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Geez Dave every time I see your images it brings me back to my youth and the New Jersey coast. I was a Seaside Heights and Beach Haven teenager during the whole summer breaks We had a house in Ortley beach but we sold it when I was about 14 so I was more about girls than photography back than. LOL

    Yes " under the board walk " was my theme song. ROTFLMAO
    Thanks Guy. We in fact live in Beach Haven year round. Truly a paradise (especially off-season). If on the east coast in our area, please look me up---will give you the grand tour to really bring back memories.
    Dave

  20. #70
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Beach Haven, NJ
    Posts
    685
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by D&A View Post
    Jack Wrote >>>"Note: After reviewing several ZF18 shots from my recent trip, I will be keeping it and probably not bother on the 17-35 zoom as I do have the 24-120 as well, and find it quite acceptable from 24 up>>>

    No doubt the Zeiss 18mm is head and shoulders above the Nikon 17-35 f2.8 when set at 18mm, especially towards the corners...even if the zoom is well stopped down. With that said, where the zoom does well is in a compact travel kit when it's paried with a relatively small telezoom such as the Tamron 70-300 VC lens which is amazingly good on the D800 and far superior to Nikon's own version. A small 50mm G lens can be thrown into the mix if desired. This gives an relatively light weight 17-300mm kit that perfoms well save for that relatively small amount of corner deterioration between 17-22mm with the 17-35mm zoom.

    Jack, really nice image of the turning torso building and one of a number of favorites of mine that you've posted from your recent/current trip.

    Dave (D&A)
    Dave (D&A): I agree with your zoom kit approach. I actually use two kits for the D800E, depending on what I feel like carrying, Tripod or hand held, the type of shoot, etc. For a zoom kit I use Nikon 14-24mm, Tamron 24-70 VC, and Tamron 70-300 VC. Both Tamrons are really really a nice set of relatively inexpensive lenses that perform well for me (I'm not a Pro, so my expectations may not be as high as some). I sometimes leave the 14-24 home, because as others have said, it is a monster. That, plus that bulbous protruding front element intimidates me. My work is around blowing fine sand and salt air/spray, so I do not follow conventional wisdom, and I do keep UV filters on ALL my lenses, except the 14-24.

    When I want to only carry small primes, I have 18mm Zeiss ZF.2, 35mm f2 Zeiss ZF, 50mm Nikkor f1.8 G, and finally the manual focuse gem: the 90mm f3.5 Apo Lanthar (the newer chipped version for Nikon cameras). DigLloyd raves about this lens, and I agree, sharp center and edges, even at full aperature. A real gem that I have not really tapped it's potential, because I am basically a wide angle guy
    Regards all....this thread is enlightening.
    Dave
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  21. #71
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    A bit north of Copenhagen
    Posts
    1,522
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    569

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by gurtch View Post
    Here are two taken with the Zeiss ZF.2, hand held, about f10 on a D800E.
    Regards to all
    Dave in NJ
    Very nice pictures and perspective, Dave!
    Best
    Thorkil

  22. #72
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    A bit north of Copenhagen
    Posts
    1,522
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    569

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Geez Dave every time I see your images it brings me back to my youth and the New Jersey coast. I was a Seaside Heights and Beach Haven teenager during the whole summer breaks We had a house in Ortley beach but we sold it when I was about 14 so I was more about girls than photography back than. LOL

    Yes " under the board walk " was my theme song. ROTFLMAO
    Don't mention it Guy, when I was 14 laying at a little beach at the lake "Furesoen" a bit north of Copenhagen, some 10 meters away, there was a girl laying with one of this new, innovative, technical inventions, the transister-radio, that was schratching out in the shaking summer-air...Under the board walk...by Rolling Stones, I got hit by them, they were so wonderfull unpolished compared to the Beatles, have been their fan ever since, and when I have to make very booring descriptions, working, Stones just have to come out of the speakers.
    Sorry
    Thorkil
    Last edited by Thorkil; 21st August 2012 at 23:51.

  23. #73
    Senior Subscriber Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,306
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    I love the size, performance, and general feel of the 18. And the focal length is right in the sweet spot for me. Plus, it takes filters; 4" NDs in particular work quite well. I find it complementary to the 14-24, not really a substitute.

  24. #74
    Senior Member danielmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    272
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    18

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    @Dave, if you keep UV's on your glass you may like to pick up the Fotodiox filter adapter and UV. I contemplated drop kicking it at first but after some use, meaning attaching/removing cycles, it gets both easier and faster with some wear in. Hold your judgment until you've had it on and off a dozen times or so. As with many lenses, after the shotgun honeymoon and tedious get to know you phase is over, with real knowledge of it's focusing behaviors, it's a strong performer through it's wide range. If you find the left or right edge softer, place it in the sky and bob's your uncle. As much as I'd like to have a full WA set of Zeiss primes, I find myself truly satisfied with the 14-24, more so now that I can filter it for sand/water, etc.

  25. #75
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Beach Haven, NJ
    Posts
    685
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Thanks danielmoore. I looked into the Fotodiox you mentioned....I may have to go that route!
    dave

  26. #76
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    74
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    I've been using the Fotodiox filters (Pol & 5 stop grad) for about a month. Took some getting used to the size but works quite well. It convinced me to stick with the 14-24.

  27. #77
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,674
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by gurtch View Post
    Here are two taken with the Zeiss ZF.2, hand held, about f10 on a D800E.
    Regards to all
    Dave in NJ
    Dave, Great shots as always. I am especially partical to the second one on the "right". Reminds me of the late summer sunsets of August where the slight chill in the air makes for crystal clear skies and reminds all that autumn colors and that season is just around the corner. It's an image thats one can relax and enjoy the ambience it displays.
    Dave (D&A)

  28. #78
    Senior Member Antonio Chagin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Miami-Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    476
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Nikon 14-24 at 14mm, F/8, ISO 100, 2 sec. Was getting ready for a night shot.



    100% Near centre.


    100% Bottom Left Corner.


    100% Bottom edge.


    100% Bottom Right Corner.


    100% Right Edge.
    www.achdigital.com
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  29. #79
    Senior Member danielmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    272
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    18

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Antonio, where did you put the focus in this image?

  30. #80
    Senior Member Antonio Chagin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Miami-Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    476
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Daniel the focus is in the middle distance. With Live View.

  31. #81
    Senior Member Antonio Chagin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Miami-Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    476
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    This is another one later that evening. 14-24 @ 14mm, ISO 100, F/5.6, 30sec. At 5.6 centre is better, extremes are the same. Note the flare.

    Full JPG HERE.

    www.achdigital.com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  32. #82
    Senior Member Antonio Chagin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Miami-Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    476
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    This is part of the sky with moon of a night shot. Flare.. changing the angle sometimes work to avoid or minimise this flare. Otherwise clone..


  33. #83
    Subscriber & Workshop Member GrahamWelland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    5,802
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    564

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Antonio,

    With the 14-24 the flare I tended to witness in shots with the sun in the frame typically had a mini rainbow segment in them. Almost like a couple of difracted stripe sets. Tough remove unless you can clone the entire flare out.
    Remember: adventure before dementia!

    As Oscar Wilde said, "my tastes are simple, I only like the best"
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  34. #84
    Senior Member biglouis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,127
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    I've only just dipped into this thread today. I've been a little underwhelmed by the photographs in the 'fun with D800 thread' but the Zeiss glass in this thread really showcases the D800 beautifully.

    Thanks

    LouisB

  35. #85
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Bergen (soon Lofoten)
    Posts
    63
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by Thorkil View Post
    Hi Fredrick
    Would you care for showing some more 21mm Zeiss pictures? Or a homepage?
    Would be nice with some from Lofoten. And what are your expiences so far?
    Thorkil
    Hi, sorry for my late reply. I have been traveling the last few days. My experiences with the lens are only good. I really love it. It has stellar sharpness, but it could be a bit sharper in the edges. It has really nice micro-contrast which gives a nice 3D-effect to the images. I do indeed have a page, but I don't reach Lofoten before Monday. This is my page

  36. #86
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    A bit north of Copenhagen
    Posts
    1,522
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    569

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Thank you very much Fredrick! I'll take a carefull look at your page.
    Thorkil

  37. #87
    Senior Member johnnygoesdigital's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,579
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    I've been following this thread because of my need for a wide prime. The obvious choices are the 24mm 1.4 G, Zf.2 21mm, and Zf.2 18mm. I took the Zf.2 18mm for a walk, and must say that it's an impressive little lens. The size is perfect for remote treks if weight is a concern, and getting "everything in", the viewfinder is easy! The micro-contrast is really nice and distortion is well controlled - you can even use this to your advantage. This 18mm is my new favorite and really love the build quality.

    These are obviously low res, so don't quite capture the amazing detail! There's great DOF, from the rocks to the waves and beyond.
    Last edited by johnnygoesdigital; 26th November 2012 at 06:55.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  38. #88
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    A bit north of Copenhagen
    Posts
    1,522
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    569

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    for the right one, lovely!
    Thorkil

  39. #89
    espressogeek
    Guest

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    The shot of that building in sweden nearly sells me on the 18mm. Its weird that the tests online dont show this lens being special but the photos indicate something else. I would jump to the conclusion that it doesn't perform as well up close as it does far away but lensrentals.com says it performs better up close. I'm totally confused now.

    I would just buy a 21mm distagon for Nikon and call it a day but I can't find one.

  40. #90
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by espressogeek View Post
    The shot of that building in sweden nearly sells me on the 18mm. Its weird that the tests online dont show this lens being special but the photos indicate something else. I would jump to the conclusion that it doesn't perform as well up close as it does far away but lensrentals.com says it performs better up close. I'm totally confused now.

    I would just buy a 21mm distagon for Nikon and call it a day but I can't find one.
    The more I use the ZF18, the happier I am with it. I just bought an 82mm 9-stop IRND filter for it, and can't wait to get down on moving water with it on our Zion workshop in a few weeks.
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  41. #91
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,911
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    And just to whet our collective appetites, B&H now has a pre-order link for the Zeiss Distagon T* 15mm f/2.8 ZF.2. Expected availability October 16. Guy better knit a few more ski masks.

    Joe
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography

  42. #92
    espressogeek
    Guest

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Jack, which IRND did you buy? I reckon if you are happy with it I can be happy with it.

  43. #93
    Senior Member KeithL's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    832
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Apologies for resurrecting this thread but I've been reading it with interest as I'm considering buying a D800E in the near future. I'm having difficulty choosing between the Zeiss 18mm and 21mm.

    I have a few questions concerning these lenses and would be grateful for any feedback. I'd be shooting mainly architecture, but characterful old subjects rather than modernist subjects demanding critical distortion correction.

    Most here indicate that the 18 is easier to correct for distortion than the 21. Are there lens profiles in ACR that do a good job on the wave distortion for both?

    I've heard that the 18 can suffer from colour casts particularly in the corners, is this really a problem for most uses?

    Is the difference in sharpness between the two lenses enough to cause concern?

    Many thanks in advance.

    Keith

  44. #94
    Workshop Member glenerrolrd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Jupiter FL/Atlanta GA
    Posts
    2,279
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    This is a very interesting subject as I have had all three lenses and honestly don t have a well supported POV . A friend that does commercial real estate work helped me shoot the interior of our home in Florida and we found the 18 to be very effective . He did do a pano with the 50/2 zf which provided an exception file .

    A few questions ..generally for architecture don t you use f8-f16 to insure a as much DOF as possible ...an at this aperture the ability to resolve fine details (using a D800) is affected more by diffraction than differences in the lenses?

    Generally every test I have seen has shown that the Zeiss lenses have issues with wave distortion . For my use (think travel shots ) I have found this insignificant even with the ocean as a horizon . Enough can be corrected in post processing . The Zeiss 18 has less than the 21 ..however the 21 is a very special lens producing exceptional IQ on a D800. The Nikon is better here .

    The big disadvantage of the Nikon has always been its size and the huge exposed front element (filters require an add on making it much worse ) . But if I assume you are shooting on a tripod(and doing interiors) ...its not much of an issue .

    It would seem that the 14-24 would be a better pick because of the ability to more precisely frame with a variable focal length and ability to achieve a wider perspective if required .

  45. #95
    Senior Member KeithL's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    832
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Quote Originally Posted by glenerrolrd View Post
    A few questions ..generally for architecture don t you use f8-f16 to insure a as much DOF as possible ...an at this aperture the ability to resolve fine details (using a D800) is affected more by diffraction than differences in the lenses?
    Hi, many thanks for your reply. What you say is true, but the sharper the lens the more there is to play with. Much of the exterior work I do is essentially flat-plane shot at f8-f11 on MFD, although the interiors are generally f16, again on MFD.

    Quote Originally Posted by glenerrolrd View Post
    Generally every test I have seen has shown that the Zeiss lenses have issues with wave distortion . For my use (think travel shots ) I have found this insignificant even with the ocean as a horizon . Enough can be corrected in post processing . The Zeiss 18 has less than the 21 ..however the 21 is a very special lens producing exceptional IQ on a D800. The Nikon is better here .
    I would certainly need to correct much of the wave distortion. My gut instinct was to go with the 21mm for that exceptional IQ in the hope that the distortion correction would be relatively straight forward - is this merely a matter of applying a profile as I do with my Hasselblad files in Phocus? - but having read this thread I now have doubts.

    Quote Originally Posted by glenerrolrd View Post
    The big disadvantage of the Nikon has always been its size and the huge exposed front element (filters require an add on making it much worse ) . But if I assume you are shooting on a tripod(and doing interiors) ...its not much of an issue.
    Size matters here, the Nikon would be a lighter and more compact alternative system to my Hasselblad.

    Quote Originally Posted by glenerrolrd View Post
    It would seem that the 14-24 would be a better pick because of the ability to more precisely frame with a variable focal length and ability to achieve a wider perspective if required .
    Agreed, and if weight wasn't an issue it would be an option. Having said that I have always had a preference for primes. The 18 to 21 focal length is ideal for my applications. Much wider and the rendition of perspective becomes too extreme, at least for my taste and applications.

  46. #96
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    I have had all three at one time or another, the zoom obviously is very convenient to shoot but a pain to transport as well. It's a tough call the 18 distorts less than the 21 and I have the Samyang 14mm which I love the perspective so I sold the 18 and have the Zeiss 25 which I really like. I thought about the 21 now but not willing to give up my 25 for it and the 21mm in critical situations maybe tough on interiors to work with given the distortion. I'm really hoping for a Nikon 17mm T//S to hit the streets but right now its a tough call. The zoom does suffer some focus shift issues and can be a issue but doing arch. Work one mostly would work with live view at working aperture and firmly planted on a tripod which eliminates any of that issue anyway. BTW you really want to use PT lens align plug in with the Zeiss glass. Not sure of LR since I don't use that software ever but PT lens align works really nice on the 18mm. The 21 I owned years ago on my Canons
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  47. #97
    Senior Member KeithL's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    832
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Guy, many thanks for your reply.

    Yes, despite the weight I'd take the 17 T/S every time if it existed.

  48. #98
    Senior Member johnnygoesdigital's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,579
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    The 14-24mm is front filter challenged, and for me, that has to be a consideration. The Zeiss 21mm and 18mm are both exceptional lenses, both in build quality and performance. Profiles are good to a point, but i think it blends and thus, softens and crops slightly. Less vignetting with the 21mm, but both have outstanding micro contrast. IQ for both, IMO, was about the same. My choice was based on preferred focal length.
    Last edited by johnnygoesdigital; 11th February 2013 at 07:16.

  49. #99
    Senior Subscriber Member Steen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Denmark, CPH
    Posts
    2,500
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    12

    Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm


    Keith, did you also see this thread about wide angle lenses for landscapes ?

    http://www.getdpi.com/forum/nikon/41...andscapes.html

    Just in case it might contain information of some interest for you.

  50. #100
    Senior Member KeithL's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    832
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Zeiss 21mm or Nikon 14-24mm

    Many thanks, Johnny and Steen.

    I'll plow through the 'decent wide for landscapes' thread later today.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •