JCT,
I can understand Jorgen's decision on simplification -- I did it a few years ago myself and in most ways, it was (and still is) quite liberating. But in a few others, it can be restrictive. I am close to obtaining a mirrorless (A7r specifically) to allow me to mount some specialized glass that is not otherwise compatible with Nikon. Horses for courses
But all that said, I am *VERY* happy with my D810/Df pair of bodies, and frankly they provide all I need for 98% of my shooting. However for myself, a key aspect of the Df is the way the sensor renders -- just a look to it that is so classic it's hard not to relish. If it weren't for that little aspect, I would probably do 96% of what I wanted to with the D810 all by itself.
I can understand Jorgen's decision on simplification -- I did it a few years ago myself and in most ways, it was (and still is) quite liberating. But in a few others, it can be restrictive. I am close to obtaining a mirrorless (A7r specifically) to allow me to mount some specialized glass that is not otherwise compatible with Nikon. Horses for courses
But all that said, I am *VERY* happy with my D810/Df pair of bodies, and frankly they provide all I need for 98% of my shooting. However for myself, a key aspect of the Df is the way the sensor renders -- just a look to it that is so classic it's hard not to relish. If it weren't for that little aspect, I would probably do 96% of what I wanted to with the D810 all by itself.