Jorgen Udvang
Subscriber Member
... and how about a "pocket sized" 180mm f/2.8?
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
The 16-35/4 VR would be my go to lens for wide angle as well!I've seen some full size samples and now I want it. But first I need to buy what is on my waiting list : the 16-35f4 VR
As a 30+ year Nikkor/Nikon super-tele shooter and owner of the current and previous 300mm primes I feel a need to step into the fray on this thread. I know many of you want this for a portrait lens, but I am largely a wildlife shooter.300/4 at that size, IF it is sharp wide open will be a done deal for many of us. In my case, it could mean I sell my (excellent) Sigma 120-300/2.8 -- love the Sigma IQ, even with converters, but it's HUGE at 300/2.8 proportions.
Interesting as I did not know about the 400/4 lens. I stand somewhat corrected. Two lenses out of how many models in the market is hardly a glowing testimony for the technology. None the less thanks for the info. Even old coots like me can learn something.Canon still make their two DO lenses, a 70-300 and the rather expensive 400mm f/4.
keep us posted!!!I am supposed to get the new 300mm today. So if I do, I will shoot a couple of sample shots and compare it against my existing 300mm f/4 which is one heck of a lens, so we will see.