Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 30 of 30

Thread: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

  1. #1
    Senior Member Swissblad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,204
    Post Thanks / Like

    New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Well at least according to w ..... looks interesting.

    Last edited by Swissblad; 19th June 2015 at 04:58.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    523
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    It is already showing up on commercial camera store sites, so it would appear to be far more than a rumor.

    Well done to Sigma for innovating in this way: limited range, but 'core wide angle' territory amply covered, with f2 and hopefully impressive quality.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    718
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    I'm hoping the rumored 24-70 Art is in the not too distant future.
    www.douglaswoodphotography.com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  4. #4
    Senior Member Rawfa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rio de Janeiro
    Posts
    2,393
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    I would have preffered a 28-50mm f2 or even a 24-40mm f2 instead. They say this lens is supposed to be what the 18-35mm f1.8 is for APS-C sensors, but it's not the same.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    232
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    the 82mm filter does put me off abit to be honest =(
    Keep It Simple.
    XQ2 / A7r / 15mm / 25mm / 28-35-50mm
    EOS M3 / 18-35mm

  6. #6
    Senior Member Swissblad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,204
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Quote Originally Posted by UHDR View Post
    the 82mm filter does put me off abit to be honest =(
    That is a bit of a bummer....

  7. #7
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    9,331
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2157

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Very interesting lens for me this. Will be interesting to see the weight and price. 82mm filter is no surprise. I have a feeling that 82 is becoming the new 77 for me.

  8. #8
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    9,331
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2157

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom


  9. #9
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,908
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    The limited 24-35mm zoom range is disappointing. It would only [potentially] displace the 24mm and 35mm Art lenses in my bag. I would have preferred a 24-50mm or 24-70mm and probably will pass on this one. The 24mm, 35mm and 50mm Art primes are excellent lenses, having replaced their Nikon equivalents [in my kit]. I'm OK with the 82mm filter size though.

    Joe
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography

  10. #10
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,862
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    24-35 is indeed very limiting. Wonder why in this case use a zoom instead of 2 1.4 primes.

    Needs to be at least 24-50 to become interesting for me.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    287
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Interesting, if slightly eccentric, zoom range. It might be attractive for the committed wide-angle editorial photographer who doesn't want to keep switching between fast 24 and 35 lenses and doesn't want the wasted focal length, loss of aperture and added weight of the standard 24-70 F2.8 zoom.

    I own (and buy) very few SLR lenses. This new 24-35 zoom lens would be useful as a landscape lens but F2 would be overkill. A 16-35/F4 or even 18-28/F4 ART lens would be more interesting to me (for occasional commercial applications).

  12. #12
    Senior Member Hulyss Bowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,085
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    A sort of big fat WATE/MATE Japanese mutant.
    Kind regards - Hulyss - hulyssbowman.com

  13. #13
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    I'm with Peter -- I'd rather carry two fast primes than this zoom even though it covers 3 focals and is relatively fast. If it were a 21-35 or 24-50 at f2, it might be more compelling for me, but a really good f2.8 zoom at ~ 18-40 would knock my sox off.
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  14. #14
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    9,331
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2157

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    While I agree that more zoom would be useful, particularly 21-35mm in my case, this looks like an interesting lens for many applications. I do a lot of industrial photography, and light is often lacking. One stop can mean the difference between a great and a good photo if there's a need to make a very large print. The weight isn't much more than the Sigma 24 and 35mm lenses combined, and it would save me the time of changing lenses, time that isn't always available, or using a second body.

    The biggest competitor for me would be the Tamron 15-30mm, which is almost as long and much wider, but it's a stop slower, heavier, larger and can't use ordinary filters. The latter is a big deal in an industrial environment to protect the lens. The Tamron also has OIS, but that's of limited use when there's movement, and there mostly is.

    The deciding factor will obviously be image quality. Buying this lens might mean swapping the Zeiss 21mm for the 18mm... if I have the guts to sell the 21 I look forward to see samples and reviews.

    Now, how about an 85-135mm f/2.0 portrait monster
    Things I sell: https://www.shutterstock.com/g/epixx?language=en
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  15. #15
    Senior Member bensonga's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    2,416
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    819

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Quote Originally Posted by Jorgen Udvang View Post
    Now, how about an 85-135mm f/2.0 portrait monster
    I was hoping for (and would be happy with) an 85mm f1.4 Art lens.

    Gary

  16. #16
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Let me just say this about zooms in general... I like them for their versatility; and when they cover a very narrow range, they aren't really very versatile. Next, when they're fast, f2.8 (and now 2) is about as fast as it gets, and f1.4 is a lot faster than 2 or 2.8 when it comes to focus isolation characteristics, and especially so in wides. Thirdly, fast zooms are relative tanks, and from a pure handling standpoint, I prefer primes for my fast glass for this reason. Also, there is the "look," "drawing" or "mojo" component, and zooms rarely have it. (Of course the Sigma ART lenses are already so clean, their "mojo" is mostly in their oof character surrounding that very clean rendering...) So in conclusion speaking for myself, when it comes to zooms I am okay with slower apertures to get the more versatile ranges.

    Note this doesn't mean I'm not attracted to fast zooms, I always seem to be. But at the same time I've learned that I rarely use them if I have faster primes in those focals already, so I will not be clamoring for this new Sigma.
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Moscow
    Posts
    462
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Did some sizing and it seems this lens is about the same size as the 16-35 2.8 and 24-70 2.8, which explains the 82mm filter I suppose.



    Zoom ranges are 2.1x, 2.9x and 1.45x respectively, so the fast aperture is there due to the very limited zoom range, if you can call it a zoom.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  18. #18
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Quote Originally Posted by Kolor-Pikker View Post
    if you can call it a zoom.
    Actually, we should probably refer to it as a "stepless tri-focal"
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  19. #19
    Senior Member Malina DZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    S. Florida
    Posts
    549
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    I hoped for 28/1.4 Art... Can't wait to see how it performs in the middle of its zoom range.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    523
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    A f2 zoom has one huge advantage for photographers who need to work at pace and that it is... a zoom (that offers a stop more than the regular mid range examples)! You can do so much more at f2 than you could have a few years ago due to amazing high ISO. For PJs and documentary shooters, this lens can sit on one body with a 50mm prime, or 85mm portrait lens on the other and get 98% of everything done. We already have the primes, but this gives people another option and way of working. Personally, if this lens is very good, I would take it over the two primes any day of the week for documentary work.

    My Pentax 28-45 for the 645 is a great example of what happens when you limit the focal range of zooms: you get amazing image quality that rivals primes, but offers more flexibility in exchange for greater bulk. We all have different needs but I think this lens will appeal to quite a few people like me who do 90% of their shooting in this range.

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Moscow
    Posts
    462
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Quote Originally Posted by turtle View Post
    My Pentax 28-45 for the 645 is a great example of what happens when you limit the focal range of zooms: you get amazing image quality that rivals primes, but offers more flexibility in exchange for greater bulk. We all have different needs but I think this lens will appeal to quite a few people like me who do 90% of their shooting in this range.
    Just for fun, the 28-45mm against the Sigma:



    2.3 stops slower, but stabilized, longer range and 645, still a beast. I want one so bad.
    Last edited by Kolor-Pikker; 21st June 2015 at 00:50.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  22. #22
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    9,331
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2157

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Interestingly, one of the most loved WA zooms for the DX format is the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8. I've never owned it, since I went to m4/3 around the time it was launched, but this one is obviously comparable, although much faster, relative to the sensor size it's designed for, and not as wide.

    21-28mm would probably have been more useful for me, or at least closer to what I'm used to, but it does cover two primes, without being much larger than either, and it does save a lot of lens changes. If I was going to make an ultra efficient AF setup for travel, this lens and a 70-200 f/4 would probably cover most bases. I would carry a 50mm prime as well though. Add a 15 or 18mm when it's needed, and it's complete.

  23. #23
    Senior Member Rawfa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rio de Janeiro
    Posts
    2,393
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Even a 35-50mm would have been better IMO

  24. #24
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    3,182
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Maybe I'm in the minority but I think this may be a great lens if it performs up to the standards of the other Sigma Art lenses. I believe that a 21-35/2 would be more desirable but harder to correct for.
    Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  25. #25
    Member jlancasterd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Garndolbenmaen, Wales
    Posts
    164
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Quote Originally Posted by HiredArm View Post
    Maybe I'm in the minority but I think this may be a great lens if it performs up to the standards of the other Sigma Art lenses. I believe that a 21-35/2 would be more desirable but harder to correct for.
    Maybe they'll do an 18-24 next…
    John L Dobson
    Editor, Ffestiniog Railway Magazine
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  26. #26
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Quote Originally Posted by jlancasterd View Post
    Maybe they'll do an 18-24 next…
    IMHO it's what they SHOULD have done this time, even if it was a 2.8. Just sayin...
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  27. #27
    Member Jolly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    183
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Quote Originally Posted by Rawfa View Post
    I would have preffered a 28-50mm f2 or even a 24-40mm f2 instead. They say this lens is supposed to be what the 18-35mm f1.8 is for APS-C sensors, but it's not the same.
    24 or 36 megapixels cameras and this lens .... means that Sigma gave us a 24-....35...40...50 just with some crop.


    I welcome this new 24mm-almost 45mm F/2.0

    Imagine this lens with a 36mpixel and up camera ...
    just matter of time

  28. #28
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    9,331
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2157

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    Some samples are up on Sigma's blog.

    http://blog.sigmaphoto.com/2015/sigm...1ebc2-50802369

  29. #29
    Senior Member Malina DZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    S. Florida
    Posts
    549
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom


  30. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    718
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: New Sigma 24-35mm f2.0 ART zoom

    anyone here shooting this yet? curious.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •