Jorgen Udvang
Subscriber Member
Thanks, Corlan. You bring up two interesting questions. I agree that the 85mm renders the colours more saturated, particularly when both lenses are used wide open or near wide open. Two or three camera bodies, each with one prime lens, would probably be the best solution for a concert like this.Jorgen, this whole series is wonderful, simply put it's like we've been there.
On the technical side, the 85 seems to render a bit more saturated colors than the Tamron, at least under these conditions.
Btw i was wondering what kind of metering you were using here to avoid specular highlights and even get rich colors instead. I rarely do this kind of shots so it's just a feeling, but it seems particularly good on your series.
I've found that center-weighted metering gives the best results for concerts, unless the subject fills the frame, in which case I use spot-metering. This is particularly true for rock concerts, where light is changing rapidly. That doesn't seem to affect center-weighted as much as other metering methods, simply because it's less exact. I mostly dial in EV -1, but that may vary by as much a +/- 1EV.
Another challenge with rock concerts is the vibrations. At this one, I took many shots hanging by one arm and one leg from one of the loudspeaker towers. Apart from the fact that it's uncomfortable, I tried to click the shutter between the beats, since the deep bass blurs the photos.
The high ISO limitations of the D80 is a challenge too. If I was doing this for money, I would probably have to buy a D700 or D3s, but they are rather big and heavy, and FX means larger lenses as well. A Pentax K-x, with its excellent low-light capabilities, would be a cheap alternative, and the Pentax primes would be exactly what I need, but concerts are just the situations where one needs to see what focusing point is active, and that's not a feature on the K-x.