http://www.cicfou.com/Infos/files/4131e5b4d565ba098041e6de321d1e6b-16.html
41/2.8 lens
Sorry not much info...
Source was Magazine Réponses Photo...
41/2.8 lens
Sorry not much info...
Source was Magazine Réponses Photo...
Last edited:
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
But at f2.8, wouldn't you rather get the Oly m4/3 next year and the same focal length at f1.7 (with Panny lens)? You get 1.5 stops on lens and then presumably at least another stop or two in ISO performance assuming Panny's & Sigma's sensors get better by the same amount.
The DP1 has noticeably more dynamic range than the E-420. In black and white, the DP1 also offers significantly more usable high ISO range than the E-420, with the reverse true for color. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the DP2 proves to be the better black and white camera, at least from an sensor image quality standpoint. Then there's the lens characteristics to consider, which aside from speed are unknown for both lenses.But at f2.8, wouldn't you rather get the Oly m4/3 next year and the same focal length at f1.7 (with Panny lens)? You get 1.5 stops on lens and then presumably at least another stop or two in ISO performance assuming Panny's & Sigma's sensors get better by the same amount.
noooooooo, the LCD on the DP1 truly truly sucks. and if they haven't changed the way it operates... the DP1 is my least used camera because i just hate shooting with it. i seriously have to force myself to use it. granted, f/2.8 would have made it better, but still...Actually I am more stoked about the DP2 than I am about the Panny G1 or even the yet to be finalized Olympus M4/3.
If the operational speed had been increased, even with same LCD it will rock